• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

额网络动态反映了减少动机行为中适应不良偏差的神经计算机制。

Frontal network dynamics reflect neurocomputational mechanisms for reducing maladaptive biases in motivated action.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 18;16(10):e2005979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005979. eCollection 2018 Oct.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.2005979
PMID:30335745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6207318/
Abstract

Motivation exerts control over behavior by eliciting Pavlovian responses, which can either match or conflict with instrumental action. We can overcome maladaptive motivational influences putatively through frontal cognitive control. However, the neurocomputational mechanisms subserving this control are unclear; does control entail up-regulating instrumental systems, down-regulating Pavlovian systems, or both? We combined electroencephalography (EEG) recordings with a motivational Go/NoGo learning task (N = 34), in which multiple Go options enabled us to disentangle selective action learning from nonselective Pavlovian responses. Midfrontal theta-band (4 Hz-8 Hz) activity covaried with the level of Pavlovian conflict and was associated with reduced Pavlovian biases rather than reduced instrumental learning biases. Motor and lateral prefrontal regions synchronized to the midfrontal cortex, and these network dynamics predicted the reduction of Pavlovian biases over and above local, midfrontal theta activity. This work links midfrontal processing to detecting Pavlovian conflict and highlights the importance of network processing in reducing the impact of maladaptive, Pavlovian biases.

摘要

动机通过引发巴甫洛夫反应来控制行为,这些反应既可以与工具性行为相匹配,也可以与之冲突。我们可以通过前额叶认知控制来克服适应性不良的动机影响。然而,支持这种控制的神经计算机制尚不清楚;控制是否需要上调工具系统,下调巴甫洛夫系统,还是两者兼而有之?我们结合了脑电图(EEG)记录和动机 Go/NoGo 学习任务(N=34),其中多个 Go 选项使我们能够从非选择性巴甫洛夫反应中分离出选择性动作学习。中前额叶θ波段(4Hz-8Hz)活动与巴甫洛夫冲突的程度相关,并与减少巴甫洛夫偏见而不是减少工具性学习偏见有关。运动和外侧前额叶区域与中前额叶皮层同步,这些网络动态预测了巴甫洛夫偏见的减少,超过了局部中前额叶θ活动。这项工作将中前额叶处理与检测巴甫洛夫冲突联系起来,并强调了网络处理在减少适应性、巴甫洛夫偏见的影响方面的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/5677ac74728e/pbio.2005979.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/ac67ad94d019/pbio.2005979.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/4ab286f805f5/pbio.2005979.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/50a6c8f3fb25/pbio.2005979.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/b014ca15bb39/pbio.2005979.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/2a852c650436/pbio.2005979.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/5677ac74728e/pbio.2005979.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/ac67ad94d019/pbio.2005979.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/4ab286f805f5/pbio.2005979.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/50a6c8f3fb25/pbio.2005979.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/b014ca15bb39/pbio.2005979.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/2a852c650436/pbio.2005979.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d74/6207318/5677ac74728e/pbio.2005979.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Frontal network dynamics reflect neurocomputational mechanisms for reducing maladaptive biases in motivated action.额网络动态反映了减少动机行为中适应不良偏差的神经计算机制。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 18;16(10):e2005979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005979. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Frontal theta overrides pavlovian learning biases.额部θ波抑制巴甫洛夫式学习偏向。
J Neurosci. 2013 May 8;33(19):8541-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5754-12.2013.
3
Neural signatures of arbitration between Pavlovian and instrumental action selection.巴甫洛夫式与工具性动作选择之间仲裁的神经特征。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Feb 10;17(2):e1008553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008553. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
The impact of traumatic stress on Pavlovian biases.创伤后应激对巴甫洛夫式偏见的影响。
Psychol Med. 2018 Jan;48(2):327-336. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700174X. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
5
Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior.额前冲突相关的θ波段功率反映了预测行为的神经振荡。
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Dec;110(12):2752-63. doi: 10.1152/jn.00479.2013. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
6
Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action.儿茶酚胺能激发揭示了动机性(不)行动中不同的巴甫洛夫式和工具性机制。
Elife. 2017 May 15;6:e22169. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22169.
7
Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control.运动干扰而非感觉干扰增加反应性控制过程中的额中theta 活动和大脑同步性。
J Neurosci. 2021 Feb 24;41(8):1788-1801. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1682-20.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
8
Multiple Midfrontal Thetas Revealed by Source Separation of Simultaneous MEG and EEG.通过同时进行的 MEG 和 EEG 的源分离揭示多个额中Theta 波。
J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 30;40(40):7702-7713. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0321-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signatures of Pavlovian and Instrumental Valuation Systems during a Modified Orthogonalized Go/No-go Task.在改良的正交 Go/No-go 任务中,Pavlovian 和工具性估值系统的功能磁共振成像特征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Dec 1;35(12):2089-2109. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02062.
10
The neurocognitive role of working memory load when Pavlovian motivational control affects instrumental learning.当巴甫洛夫式动机控制影响工具性学习时,工作记忆负荷的神经认知作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Dec 8;19(12):e1011692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011692. eCollection 2023 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Decrease in decision noise from adolescence into adulthood mediates an increase in more sophisticated choice behaviors and performance gain.青春期到成年期决策噪声的减少,介导了更复杂的选择行为和表现增益的增加。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Nov 14;22(11):e3002877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002877. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Pavlovian impatience: The anticipation of immediate rewards increases approach behaviour.巴甫洛夫式的不耐烦:对即时奖励的期待会增加趋近行为。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr;25(2):358-376. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01236-2. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
High stakes slow responding, but do not help overcome Pavlovian biases in humans.

本文引用的文献

1
A human prefrontal-subthalamic circuit for cognitive control.人类前额叶-丘脑底核认知控制回路。
Brain. 2018 Jan 1;141(1):205-216. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx300.
2
Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action.儿茶酚胺能激发揭示了动机性(不)行动中不同的巴甫洛夫式和工具性机制。
Elife. 2017 May 15;6:e22169. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22169.
3
Frontosubthalamic Circuits for Control of Action and Cognition.用于控制行动与认知的额叶-底丘脑环路
高风险反应慢,但无助于克服人类的巴甫洛夫偏见。
Learn Mem. 2024 Sep 16;31(8). doi: 10.1101/lm.054017.124. Print 2024 Aug.
4
Pupil dilation reflects effortful action invigoration in overcoming aversive Pavlovian biases.瞳孔扩张反映了在克服厌恶的巴甫洛夫偏见时费力行动的激发。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;24(4):720-739. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01191-y. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Neural Pathways Linking Autonomous Exercise Motivation and Exercise-Induced Unhealthy Eating: A Resting-State fMRI Study.连接自主运动动机与运动诱发的不健康饮食的神经通路:一项静息态功能磁共振成像研究
Brain Sci. 2024 Feb 27;14(3):221. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030221.
6
A tutorial on fitting joint models of M/EEG and behavior to understand cognition.一篇关于拟合 M/EEG 和行为联合模型以理解认知的教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6020-6050. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02331-x. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
7
Prefrontal signals precede striatal signals for biased credit assignment in motivational learning biases.在动机学习偏差中,前额叶信号先于纹状体信号,以便进行有偏差的信用分配。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 2;15(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44632-x.
8
The neurocognitive role of working memory load when Pavlovian motivational control affects instrumental learning.当巴甫洛夫式动机控制影响工具性学习时,工作记忆负荷的神经认知作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Dec 8;19(12):e1011692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011692. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Transcranial direct-current stimulation enhances Pavlovian tendencies during intermittent loss of control.经颅直流电刺激在间歇性失控期间增强巴甫洛夫式倾向。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 9;14:1164208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1164208. eCollection 2023.
10
The effects of induced positive and negative affect on Pavlovian-instrumental interactions.诱发正性和负性情绪对巴甫洛夫-工具性相互作用的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Nov;36(7):1343-1360. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2109600. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 9;36(45):11489-11495. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2348-16.2016.
4
Neural Correlates of Decision Thresholds in the Human Subthalamic Nucleus.人类丘脑底核决策阈值的神经关联
Curr Biol. 2016 Apr 4;26(7):916-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.051. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
5
Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence.认知的节奏:通过连贯性进行交流。
Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):220-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034.
6
(No) time for control: Frontal theta dynamics reveal the cost of temporally guided conflict anticipation.无暇控制:额叶θ波动力学揭示了时间引导的冲突预期成本。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Dec;15(4):787-807. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0367-2.
7
fMRI and EEG predictors of dynamic decision parameters during human reinforcement learning.人类强化学习过程中动态决策参数的功能磁共振成像和脑电图预测指标
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 14;35(2):485-94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2036-14.2015.
8
Conflict acts as an implicit cost in reinforcement learning.冲突在强化学习中充当一种隐式成本。
Nat Commun. 2014 Nov 4;5:5394. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6394.
9
Opponent actor learning (OpAL): modeling interactive effects of striatal dopamine on reinforcement learning and choice incentive.对抗者学习(OpAL):纹状体多巴胺对强化学习和选择动机的交互作用建模
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;121(3):337-66. doi: 10.1037/a0037015.
10
A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling.用于认知冲突检测和信号传递的神经微电路。
Trends Neurosci. 2014 Sep;37(9):480-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 14.