Burghoorn Floor, Scheres Anouk, Monterosso John, Guo Mingqian, Luo Shan, Roelofs Karin, Figner Bernd
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr;25(2):358-376. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01236-2. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
People often exhibit intertemporal impatience by choosing immediate small over delayed larger rewards, which has been implicated across maladaptive behaviours and mental health symptoms. In this preregistered study, we tested the role of an intertemporal Pavlovian bias as possible psychological mechanism driving the temptation posed by immediate rewards. Concretely, we hypothesized that the anticipation of immediate rewards (compared with preference-matched delayed rewards) enhances goal-directed approach behaviour but interferes with goal-directed inhibition. Such a mechanism could contribute to the difficulty to inhibit ourselves in the face of immediate rewards (e.g., a drug), at the cost of long-term (e.g., health) goals. A sample of 184 participants completed a newly developed reinforcement learning go/no-go task with four trial types: Go to win immediate reward; Go to win delayed reward; No-go to win immediate reward; and No-go to win delayed reward trials. Go responding was increased in trials in which an immediate reward was available compared with trials in which a preference-matched delayed reward was available. Computational models showed that on average, this behavioural pattern was best captured by a cue-response bias reflecting a stronger elicitation of go responses upon presentation of an immediate (versus delayed) reward cue. The results of this study support the role of an intertemporal Pavlovian bias as a psychological mechanism contributing to impatient intertemporal choice.
人们常常表现出跨期不耐烦,选择即时的小奖励而非延迟的大奖励,这与各种适应不良行为和心理健康症状有关。在这项预先注册的研究中,我们测试了跨期巴甫洛夫偏差作为驱动即时奖励所带来诱惑的可能心理机制的作用。具体而言,我们假设对即时奖励的预期(与偏好匹配的延迟奖励相比)会增强目标导向的趋近行为,但会干扰目标导向的抑制。这样一种机制可能导致我们在面对即时奖励(例如毒品)时难以抑制自己,而以长期(例如健康)目标为代价。184名参与者的样本完成了一项新开发的强化学习“去/不去”任务,该任务有四种试验类型:去获取即时奖励;去获取延迟奖励;不去获取即时奖励;以及不去获取延迟奖励试验。与有偏好匹配的延迟奖励的试验相比,在有即时奖励的试验中,去反应增加。计算模型表明,平均而言,这种行为模式最好由一种线索-反应偏差来捕捉,该偏差反映出在呈现即时(而非延迟)奖励线索时,去反应的诱发更强。这项研究的结果支持了跨期巴甫洛夫偏差作为一种心理机制在促成不耐烦的跨期选择中所起的作用。