UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation and UCLA Department of Urban Planning, 3323 School of Public Affairs Building, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1656, USA.
The Nature Conservancy, 445 South Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90071, USA.
Environ Manage. 2021 Jan;67(1):12-25. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01377-3. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
U.S. public university campuses are held directly responsible for compliance with many of the same federal- and state-level environmental regulations as cities, including stormwater management. While operating as 'cities within cities' in many respects, campuses face unique constraints in achieving stormwater regulatory compliance. To compare the abilities of campuses to comply with stormwater regulations to municipalities, we conduct mixed-methods research using primary data from five University of California (UC) campuses. Public universities constituted over 20% of California's "nontraditional" permittees under the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) regulation regime in 2013. We utilize semi-structured interviews with campus and regulatory officials, a survey of campus students and staff around support and willingness to pay for innovative stormwater management, and content analysis of campus stormwater management documents to examine challenges to public university stormwater compliance. We find that, despite their progressive environmental practices in other areas like energy and water conservation, even as compared to cities, stormwater management practices on the evaluated campuses are constrained by several factors: infrastructure financing limitations, lack of transparent and coordinated decision-making, a lack of campus resident involvement, and regulatory inflexibility. Our study provides new insights, both for understanding campuses as sustainable 'cities within cities' and more broadly for urban environmental compliance regimes globally.
美国公立大学校园直接负责遵守许多与城市相同的联邦和州一级的环境法规,包括雨水管理。虽然在许多方面都作为“城市中的城市”运营,但校园在实现雨水监管合规方面面临着独特的限制。为了将校园遵守雨水法规的能力与市政当局进行比较,我们使用来自加利福尼亚大学(UC)五个校区的主要数据进行混合方法研究。在 2013 年,公立大学在市政单独雨水下水道系统(MS4)监管制度下构成了加利福尼亚州“非传统”许可证持有者的 20%以上。我们利用与校园和监管官员的半结构化访谈、对校园学生和工作人员关于支持和愿意为创新雨水管理付费的调查,以及对校园雨水管理文件的内容分析,来考察公立大学校园雨水管理合规面临的挑战。我们发现,尽管这些校园在能源和水保护等其他领域具有进步的环境实践,但与城市相比,评估校园的雨水管理实践受到以下几个因素的限制:基础设施融资限制、缺乏透明和协调的决策制定、缺乏校园居民参与以及监管灵活性不足。我们的研究为理解校园作为可持续的“城市中的城市”提供了新的见解,更广泛地为全球城市环境合规制度提供了新的见解。