• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症和感染性休克——在一个内科重症监护病房的观察性研究:发病率、处理方法以及死亡率预测因子。

Sepsis and septic shock - an observational study of the incidence, management, and mortality predictors in a medical intensive care unit.

机构信息

Iva Klobučar, Department of Cardiology, "Sestre Milosrdnice" University Hospital Center, Vinogradska cesta 29, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia,

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2020 Oct 31;61(5):429-439. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.429.

DOI:10.3325/cmj.2020.61.429
PMID:33150761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7684537/
Abstract

AIM

To prospectively determine the number of patients with sepsis and septic shock in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) using the Sepsis-3 definition; to analyze patients' characteristics, clinical signs, diagnostic test results, treatment and outcomes; and to define independent risk factors for ICU mortality.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled all patients with the diagnosis of sepsis treated in the medical ICU of "Sestre Milosrdnice" University Hospital Center, Zagreb, between April 2017 and May 2018.

RESULTS

Out of 116 patients with sepsis, 54.3% were female. The median age was 73.5 years (IQR 63-82). The leading source of infection was the genitourinary tract (56.9%), followed by the lower respiratory tract (22.4%). A total of 35.3% of the patients experienced septic shock. Total ICU mortality for sepsis was 37.9%: 63.4% in patients with septic shock and 24.0% in patients without shock. Independent risk factors for ICU mortality were reduced mobility level (odds ratio [OR] 11.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.45-50.91), failure to early recognize sepsis in the emergency department (OR 6.59, 95% CI 1.09-39.75), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at admission (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.59-3.52), and inappropriate antimicrobial treatment (OR 9.99, 95% CI 2.57-38.87).

CONCLUSION

While reduced mobility level and SOFA score are predetermined characteristics, early recognition of sepsis and the choice of appropriate antimicrobial treatment could be subject to change. Raising awareness of sepsis among emergency department physicians could improve its early recognition and increase the number of timely obtained specimens for microbial cultures.

摘要

目的

使用 Sepsis-3 定义前瞻性地确定重症监护病房(ICU)中脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的数量;分析患者的特征、临床体征、诊断试验结果、治疗和结局;并确定 ICU 死亡率的独立危险因素。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了 2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 5 月期间在萨格勒布“斯特雷米尔索尼奇”大学医院中心内科 ICU 接受脓毒症治疗的所有患者。

结果

在 116 名脓毒症患者中,54.3%为女性。中位年龄为 73.5 岁(IQR 63-82)。感染的主要来源是泌尿生殖系统(56.9%),其次是下呼吸道(22.4%)。共有 35.3%的患者发生脓毒性休克。脓毒症 ICU 死亡率为 37.9%:脓毒性休克患者为 63.4%,无休克患者为 24.0%。ICU 死亡率的独立危险因素为活动能力降低(比值比[OR] 11.16,95%置信区间[CI] 2.45-50.91)、急诊科未能早期识别脓毒症(OR 6.59,95% CI 1.09-39.75)、入院时 SOFA 评分较高(OR 2.37,95% CI 1.59-3.52)和抗菌药物治疗不当(OR 9.99,95% CI 2.57-38.87)。

结论

虽然活动能力降低和 SOFA 评分是既定特征,但早期识别脓毒症和选择适当的抗菌药物治疗可能会发生变化。提高急诊科医生对脓毒症的认识,可以改善其早期识别,并增加及时获得微生物培养标本的数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/751add0c7f66/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/c1060c7575d1/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/1c43f7218bb8/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/454b44a24b8e/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/751add0c7f66/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/c1060c7575d1/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/1c43f7218bb8/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/454b44a24b8e/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5b/7684537/751add0c7f66/CroatMedJ_61_0429-F4.jpg

相似文献

1
Sepsis and septic shock - an observational study of the incidence, management, and mortality predictors in a medical intensive care unit.脓毒症和感染性休克——在一个内科重症监护病房的观察性研究:发病率、处理方法以及死亡率预测因子。
Croat Med J. 2020 Oct 31;61(5):429-439. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.429.
2
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.大学医院医学重症监护病房314例脓毒症发作的生存分析:重症监护病房性能及抗菌治疗的影响
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97.
3
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of community-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective observational study in 12 university hospitals in Korea.韩国 12 所大学医院开展的一项前瞻性观察性研究:社区获得性严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的流行病学和临床特征。
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Nov;27(11):1308-14. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.11.1308. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
4
A combination of early warning score and lactate to predict intensive care unit transfer of inpatients with severe sepsis/septic shock.早期预警评分与乳酸相结合以预测严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克住院患者转入重症监护病房的情况。
Korean J Intern Med. 2015 Jul;30(4):471-7. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.4.471. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
The influence of a change in septic shock definitions on intensive care epidemiology and outcome: comparison of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions.脓毒症休克定义的改变对重症监护流行病学和结局的影响:脓毒症 2 期和脓毒症 3 期定义的比较。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Mar;50(3):207-213. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1383630. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
6
The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.在澳大利亚和新西兰的急诊科就诊的脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Mar;9(1):8-18.
7
Outcomes in Burn-Injured Patients Who Develop Sepsis.发生脓毒症的烧伤患者的预后
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Apr 26;40(3):269-273. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz017.
8
Adequate antibiotic therapy prior to ICU admission in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock reduces hospital mortality.在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)之前进行充分的抗生素治疗可降低医院死亡率。
Crit Care. 2015 Aug 27;19(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1000-z.
9
Septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit with higher SOFA score tend to have higher incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome - a preliminary analysis.入住重症监护病房的脓毒症休克患者,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分较高者发生腹腔间隔室综合征的几率往往更高——一项初步分析。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(5):370-372. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.88184.
10
Comparison of severity score models based on different sepsis definitions to predict in-hospital mortality among sepsis patients in the Intensive Care Unit.比较基于不同脓毒症定义的严重程度评分模型,以预测 ICU 脓毒症患者的住院死亡率。
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 May;44(4):226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
TM9SF1 as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker for Sepsis Severity and Mortality: A Longitudinal Study.TM9SF1作为脓毒症严重程度和死亡率的新型预后生物标志物:一项纵向研究
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Aug 25;18:11611-11626. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S527416. eCollection 2025.
2
Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Septic Shock in the Adult Medical Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Prospective Observational Study.埃塞俄比亚一家三级医院成人医学重症监护病房感染性休克患者的特征及院内结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;8(7):e71064. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71064. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Two rare cases of severe community-acquired bloodstream infections: a clinical case report.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲和北美的脓毒性休克发病率和死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2019 May 31;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6.
2
Association of septic shock definitions and standardized mortality ratio in a contemporary cohort of critically ill patients.严重感染患者当代队列中脓毒症休克定义与标准化死亡率比的相关性研究。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
3
Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Worldwide Data From the Intensive Care over Nations Audit.
两例罕见的严重社区获得性血流感染:临床病例报告
Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 10;15:1364391. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1364391. eCollection 2024.
4
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Procalcitonin in Sepsis Patients: Do They Have Any Prognostic Significance?脓毒症患者的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及降钙素原:它们有任何预后意义吗?
Cureus. 2024 Jun 14;16(6):e62360. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62360. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Impact of Appropriate Empirical Antibiotic Treatment on the Clinical Response of Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Observational Study.适当的经验性抗生素治疗对重症监护病房脓毒症患者临床反应的影响:一项单中心观察性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;13(6):569. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060569.
6
Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-III database.慢性阻塞性肺疾病与脓毒症患者 28 天死亡率的关系:基于 MIMIC-III 数据库的回顾性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Nov 9;23(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02729-5.
7
Serum galectin-3 levels predict poor prognosis in sepsis and septic shock patients.血清半乳糖凝集素-3 水平可预测脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的预后不良。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Aug 21;69(8):e20220940. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220940. eCollection 2023.
8
Value of Serum Thrombomodulin as a Marker and Predictor in Patients with Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.血清血栓调节蛋白作为脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤患者标志物及预测指标的价值
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Jul 10;16:2933-2941. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S417410. eCollection 2023.
9
Prediction of septic and hypovolemic shock in intensive care unit patients using machine learning.利用机器学习预测重症监护病房患者的感染性休克和低血容量性休克。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Oct-Dec;34(4):477-483. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220280-pt. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
Prehospital delay is an important risk factor for mortality in community-acquired bloodstream infection (CA-BSI): a matched case-control study.发病前延误是社区获得性血流感染(CA-BSI)患者死亡的一个重要危险因素:一项匹配病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 18;11(11):e052582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052582.
重症监护病房患者的脓毒症:来自全球重症监护国家审计的数据分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 19;5(12):ofy313. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy313. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
Epidemiology of sepsis in intensive care units in Turkey: a multicenter, point-prevalence study.土耳其重症监护病房脓毒症的流行病学:一项多中心、时点患病率研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Apr 16;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2013-1.
5
Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in critical care units: comparison between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations using a national critical care database.重症监护病房脓毒症和脓毒性休克的流行病学:使用国家重症监护数据库比较脓毒症-2 人群和脓毒症-3 人群。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):626-636. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex234.
6
The influence of a change in septic shock definitions on intensive care epidemiology and outcome: comparison of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions.脓毒症休克定义的改变对重症监护流行病学和结局的影响:脓毒症 2 期和脓毒症 3 期定义的比较。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Mar;50(3):207-213. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1383630. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
7
The characteristics and impact of source of infection on sepsis-related ICU outcomes.感染源对脓毒症相关重症监护病房结局的特征及影响。
J Crit Care. 2017 Oct;41:170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 23.
8
An Emergency Department Validation of the SEP-3 Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions and Comparison With 1992 Consensus Definitions.急诊科对SEP-3脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义的验证及与1992年共识定义的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):544-552.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
10
The Role of Obesity in Sepsis Outcome among Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.肥胖在重症患者脓毒症预后中的作用:一项回顾性队列分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5941279. doi: 10.1155/2016/5941279. Epub 2016 Sep 29.