• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共置,服务整合的推动者?来自东伦敦整合社区护理团队评估的经验教训。

Co-location, an enabler for service integration? Lessons from an evaluation of integrated community care teams in East London.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

University College London Manchester, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):e388-e396. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13211. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13211
PMID:33152144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9290730/
Abstract

In an attempt to support care integration that promotes joined up service provision and patient-centred care across care boundaries, local health and social care organisations have embarked on several initiatives and approaches. A key component of service integration is the co-location of different professional groups. In this study, we consider the extent to which co-location is an enabler for service integration by examining multi-professional community care teams. The study presents findings from a qualitative evaluation of integrated care initiatives in a borough of East London, England, undertaken between 2017 and 2018. The evaluation employed a participatory approach, the Researcher-in-Residence model. Participant observation (n = 80 hr) and both semi-structured individual (n = 16) and group interviews (six groups, n = 17 participants) were carried out. Thematic analysis of the data was undertaken. The findings show that co-location can be an effective enabler for service integration providing a basis for joint working, fostering improved communication and information sharing if conditions such as shared information systems and professional cultures (shared beliefs and values) are met. Organisations must consider the potential barriers to service integration such as differing professional identity, limited understanding of roles and responsibilities and a lack of continuity in personnel. Co-location remains an important facet in the development of multi-professional teams and local service integration arrangements, but as yet, has not been widely acknowledged as a priority in care practice. Organisations that are committed to greying care boundaries and providing joined up patient care must ensure that sufficient focus is provided at the service delivery level and not assume that decades of silo working in health and social care and strong professional cultures will be resolved by co-location.

摘要

为了支持促进服务整合和跨越护理边界的以患者为中心的护理的一体化护理,当地的卫生和社会保健组织已经启动了若干举措和方法。服务整合的一个关键组成部分是不同专业群体的共同定位。在这项研究中,我们通过检查多专业社区护理团队,考虑共同定位是服务整合的促进因素的程度。该研究介绍了 2017 年至 2018 年期间在英格兰东伦敦一个自治市进行的综合护理计划的定性评估结果。该评估采用了参与式方法,即研究员驻留模式。参与者观察(n=80 小时)和半结构化的个人访谈(n=16)和小组访谈(六个小组,n=17 名参与者)。对数据进行了主题分析。研究结果表明,共同定位可以是服务整合的有效促进因素,如果满足共享信息系统和专业文化(共享信念和价值观)等条件,它可以为联合工作提供基础,促进更好的沟通和信息共享。组织必须考虑服务整合的潜在障碍,例如不同的专业身份、对角色和责任的有限理解以及人员的连续性不足。共同定位仍然是多专业团队和当地服务整合安排发展的一个重要方面,但迄今为止,它尚未被广泛视为护理实践的优先事项。致力于跨越护理边界和提供连贯的患者护理的组织必须确保在服务提供层面提供足够的关注,并且不要假设卫生和社会保健部门数十年来的孤立工作和强大的专业文化将通过共同定位得到解决。

相似文献

1
Co-location, an enabler for service integration? Lessons from an evaluation of integrated community care teams in East London.共置,服务整合的推动者?来自东伦敦整合社区护理团队评估的经验教训。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):e388-e396. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13211. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Understanding integrated care at the frontline using organisational learning theory: A participatory evaluation of multi-professional teams in East London.运用组织学习理论理解一线综合医疗服务:对伦敦东部多专业团队的参与式评估
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;262:113254. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113254. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
3
Transforming community nursing services in the UK; lessons from a participatory evaluation of the implementation of a new community nursing model in East London based on the principles of the Dutch Buurtzorg model.英国社区护理服务的转型:基于荷兰 Buurtzorg 模式原则,对东伦敦新社区护理模式实施情况进行参与式评估的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4804-8.
4
(Dis)Integrated Care? Lessons from East London.(非)整合式照护?来自东伦敦的经验教训。
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Oct 19;20(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5432.
5
More that unites us than divides us? A qualitative study of integration of community health and social care services.将社区卫生和社会保健服务整合起来的因素多于将其分开的因素?一项关于整合社区卫生和社会保健服务的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 29;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01168-z.
6
A qualitative case study in the social capital of co-professional collaborative co-practice for children with speech, language and communication needs.一项关于有言语、语言和沟通需求儿童的跨专业协作共同实践社会资本的定性案例研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):514-527. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12296. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Achieving continuity of care: facilitators and barriers in community mental health teams.实现连续护理:社区心理健康团队的促进因素和障碍。
Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 18;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-23.
9
Evaluation of an integrated service delivering post diagnostic care and support for people living with dementia and their families.评估为痴呆患者及其家属提供诊断后护理和支持的综合服务。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Nov;26(6):819-828. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12592. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
10
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the design and impact of integrated health and social care services for children and young people living in underserved populations: a systematic review.探索为生活在服务不足人群中的儿童和青少年提供的综合健康与社会护理服务的设计与影响:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22508-7.
2
Floundering or Flourishing? Early Insights from the Inception of Integrated Care Systems in England.举步维艰还是蓬勃发展?来自英国综合医疗服务体系初创阶段的早期见解。
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jul 2;24(3):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7738. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
The implementation of embedded researchers in policy, public services, and commercial settings: a systematic evidence and gap map.政策、公共服务和商业环境中嵌入式研究人员的实施:系统的证据与差距图谱
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Apr 16;5(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00570-3.
4
Specifying cross-system collaboration strategies for implementation: a multi-site qualitative study with child welfare and behavioral health organizations.指定跨系统合作策略以实施:一项针对儿童福利和行为健康组织的多地点定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 12;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01335-1.
5
People-centred primary health care: a scoping review.以人为主的基层医疗保健:范围综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 9;24(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02194-3.
6
Implementing a community specialist team to support the delivery of integrated diabetes care: experiences in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic.组建社区专家团队以支持综合糖尿病护理服务的提供:爱尔兰在新冠疫情期间的经验
HRB Open Res. 2023 Jan 5;6:1. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13635.1. eCollection 2023.
7
Health outcomes and service use patterns associated with co-located outpatient mental health care and alcohol and other drug specialist treatment: A systematic review.与精神科门诊医疗和酒精及其他药物专科治疗共置有关的健康结果和服务使用模式:系统评价。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Jul;42(5):1195-1219. doi: 10.1111/dar.13651. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
8
Approaches to improving patient safety in integrated care: a scoping review.改善整合护理中患者安全的方法:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 4;13(4):e067441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067441.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding integrated care at the frontline using organisational learning theory: A participatory evaluation of multi-professional teams in East London.运用组织学习理论理解一线综合医疗服务:对伦敦东部多专业团队的参与式评估
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;262:113254. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113254. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
Organisational development to support integrated care in East London: the perspective of clinicians and social workers on the ground.组织发展以支持东伦敦的综合护理:临床医生和社会工作者的实地视角。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 May 16;34(5):603-619. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2019-0294.
3
Allied health professionals' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: an integrative review.卫生保健专业人员对初级卫生保健中跨专业合作的看法:综合评价。
J Interprof Care. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):217-228. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1732311. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
Transforming community nursing services in the UK; lessons from a participatory evaluation of the implementation of a new community nursing model in East London based on the principles of the Dutch Buurtzorg model.英国社区护理服务的转型:基于荷兰 Buurtzorg 模式原则,对东伦敦新社区护理模式实施情况进行参与式评估的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4804-8.
5
The quality and safety of locum doctors: a narrative review.临时医生的质量和安全:叙事性综述。
J R Soc Med. 2019 Nov;112(11):462-471. doi: 10.1177/0141076819877539.
6
Primary care networks: well intentioned but overambitious.基层医疗网络:初衷良好但野心勃勃。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 5;366:l5311. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5311.
7
How to be a very safe maternity unit: An ethnographic study.如何成为一个非常安全的产科病房:一项民族志研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;223:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.035. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
The benefits of co-location in primary care practices: the perspectives of general practitioners and patients in 34 countries.初级医疗保健机构中同址办公的益处:34个国家的全科医生和患者的观点
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 21;18(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2913-4.
9
An evidence synthesis of the international knowledge base for new care models to inform and mobilise knowledge for multispecialty community providers (MCPs).关于新护理模式国际知识库的证据综合,以为多专科社区提供者(MCPs)提供信息并调动知识。
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 1;5(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0346-x.
10
Integrated health and social care in England--Progress and prospects.英国的综合健康与社会护理——进展与前景。
Health Policy. 2015 Jul;119(7):856-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 May 6.