• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对面部差异患者重要的概念:一项定性研究,为儿童和青少年的 FACE-Q 新模块提供信息。

Concepts Important to Patients With Facial Differences: A Qualitative Study Informing a New Module of the FACE-Q for Children and Young Adults.

机构信息

Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Aug;58(8):1020-1031. doi: 10.1177/1055665620969589. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1177/1055665620969589
PMID:33153294
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The concepts important to children and young adults who undergo treatments for facial differences are not well-defined. Measurement of treatment outcomes from the patient's perspective is necessary to ensure goals of treatment are met. We aimed to identify concepts important to children and young adults with facial differences through a qualitative study.

DESIGN

An interpretive description qualitative approach was followed. Semistructured interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and coded using a line-by-line approach. Qualitative analysis led to the development of a conceptual framework of outcomes important to patients.

SETTING

Interviews were conducted in Canada and the United Kingdom at home, by telephone, or in the hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N = 72) were recruited between May and June 2014 from craniofacial clinics at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto) and Great Ormond Street Hospital (London). Participants included anyone with a visible and/or functional facial difference aged 8 to 29 years and fluent in English, excluding patients with a cleft. The sample included 38 females and 34 males, with a mean age of 13.9 years, and included 28 facial conditions (11 facial paralysis, 18 ear anomalies, 26 skeletal conditions, and 17 soft tissue conditions).

RESULTS

Analysis led to identification of important concepts within 4 overarching domains: facial appearance, facial function, adverse effects of treatment, and health-related quality of life (psychological, social, and school function).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides an understanding of concepts important to children and young adults with facial differences.

摘要

目的

接受面部差异治疗的儿童和青少年重视的概念尚未明确定义。从患者角度衡量治疗结果对于确保治疗目标的实现至关重要。我们旨在通过定性研究确定面部差异儿童和青少年重视的概念。

设计

采用解释性描述性定性方法。进行半结构式访谈,逐行转录并进行编码。定性分析导致形成了对患者重要的结果概念框架。

设置

访谈于 2014 年 5 月至 6 月在加拿大和英国的家中、通过电话或在医院进行。

参与者

参与者(N=72)于 2014 年 5 月至 6 月从 Sick Kids 医院(多伦多)和大奥蒙德街医院(伦敦)的颅面诊所招募。参与者包括任何有可见和/或功能面部差异且年龄在 8 至 29 岁之间、英语流利的人,但不包括有唇裂的患者。该样本包括 38 名女性和 34 名男性,平均年龄为 13.9 岁,包括 28 种面部状况(11 种面瘫,18 种耳部异常,26 种骨骼状况和 17 种软组织状况)。

结果

分析导致在 4 个总体领域内确定了重要概念:面部外观,面部功能,治疗的不良反应以及与健康相关的生活质量(心理,社会和学校功能)。

结论

我们的研究提供了对有面部差异的儿童和青少年重视的概念的理解。

相似文献

1
Concepts Important to Patients With Facial Differences: A Qualitative Study Informing a New Module of the FACE-Q for Children and Young Adults.对面部差异患者重要的概念:一项定性研究,为儿童和青少年的 FACE-Q 新模块提供信息。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Aug;58(8):1020-1031. doi: 10.1177/1055665620969589. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
What Matters to Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: An International Qualitative Study Informing the Development of the CLEFT-Q.唇腭裂患者关心的问题:一项为《唇腭裂问卷》(CLEFT-Q)开发提供信息的国际定性研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Mar;55(3):442-450. doi: 10.1177/1055665617732854. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
FACE-Q craniofacial module: Part 2 Psychometric properties of newly developed scales for children and young adults with facial conditions.FACE-Q 颅面量表模块 2:新开发的用于面部状况儿童和青少年的量表的心理测量特性。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Sep;74(9):2330-2340. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
FACE-Q Craniofacial Module: Part 1 validation of CLEFT-Q scales for use in children and young adults with facial conditions.面部质量生活问卷(FACE-Q)颅面模块:第1部分 用于患有面部疾病的儿童和年轻人的唇腭裂问卷(CLEFT-Q)量表的验证
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Sep;74(9):2319-2329. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.040. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
Establishing content validity of an orthodontic subset of the FACE-Q Craniofacial Module in children and young adults with malocclusion.确立错颌畸形儿童及青少年患者面部美学问卷(FACE-Q)颅面模块中正畸亚模块的内容效度。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Nov;24(4):553-560. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12474. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
6
Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate treatments for acne and acne scarring: the ACNE-Q.开发一种新的患者报告结局测量工具来评估痤疮和痤疮瘢痕的治疗方法:ACNE-Q。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Dec;181(6):1207-1215. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18005. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
7
Identifying health-related quality of life concepts to inform the development of the WOUND-Q.识别与健康相关的生活质量概念,以为WOUND-Q的开发提供参考。
J Wound Care. 2024 Jan 2;33(1):28-38. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.33.1.28.
8
Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Ear Conditions: The EAR-Q.一种用于耳部疾病的新型患者报告结局指标的开发:EAR-Q。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Aug 7;6(8):e1842. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001842. eCollection 2018 Aug.
9
Development of the Alberta facial clinical evaluation scale: A patient-centred outcomes instrument for facial nerve paralysis.阿尔伯塔面部临床评估量表的制定:面神经麻痹的以患者为中心的结局评估工具。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Nov;44(6):919-926. doi: 10.1111/coa.13400. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
10
Psychometric Validation of the FACE-Q Craniofacial Module for Facial Nerve Paralysis.面瘫患者面部量表(FACE-Q)颅面模块的心理计量学验证。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;24(1):1-7. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0575. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
CLEFT-Q SwePsych protocol: A prospective observational study to investigate the psychometric characteristics test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of CLEFT-Q.唇腭裂Q量表心理测量学协议:一项前瞻性观察研究,旨在调查唇腭裂Q量表的心理测量学特征、重测信度、反应度和可解释性。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0321021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321021. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures for paediatric gender-affirming care: A systematic review.儿童性别肯定治疗的患者报告结局指标:一项系统评价。
Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Jul 24;29(8):514-527. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxae019. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on the Practical Guide to Implementing PROMs in Gender-Affirming Care (PG-PROM-GAC): analysis of open-ended responses from patients and healthcare professionals.
患者和医疗保健专业人员对《实施跨性别护理中患者报告结局测量工具实用指南(PG-PROM-GAC)》的看法:对患者和医疗保健专业人员的开放式回答的分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 3;13(2):e002721. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002721.
4
Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on implementing patient-reported outcome measures in gender-affirming care: a qualitative study.患者和医疗保健专业人员对在性别肯定护理中实施患者报告的结果测量的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Nov;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002507.
5
Normative Values for Adolescent Quality of Life in Plastic Surgery: A Longitudinal, Cohort Study.整形外科中青少年生活质量的规范值:一项纵向队列研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 6;10(5):e4311. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004311. eCollection 2022 May.