Suppr超能文献

患者和医疗保健专业人员对《实施跨性别护理中患者报告结局测量工具实用指南(PG-PROM-GAC)》的看法:对患者和医疗保健专业人员的开放式回答的分析。

Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on the Practical Guide to Implementing PROMs in Gender-Affirming Care (PG-PROM-GAC): analysis of open-ended responses from patients and healthcare professionals.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 3;13(2):e002721. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002721.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Several international calls have been made for evidence-based patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation for gender-affirming care. The Practical Guide to Implementing PROMs in Gender-Affirming Care (PG-PROM-GAC) is a resource which can help guide PROM implementation efforts, developed using a three-phase participatory research approach with transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients and gender-affirming healthcare professionals. However, thoughts and perspectives from TGD patients and gender-affirming healthcare professionals on the PG-PROM-GAC need to be investigated.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate patient and healthcare professional perspectives on the PG-PROM-GAC through analysis of open-ended survey results.

DESIGN

Qualitative study analysing open-ended responses from TGD patients and gender-affirming healthcare professionals.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from a UK National Health System (NHS) gender clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients receiving care at an NHS gender clinic and healthcare professionals working at an NHS gender clinic were eligible for participation. Eligible participants were invited to participate in this study via email.

INTERVENTION

Participants were sent an open-ended survey to collect responses on the PG-PROM-GAC.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Data were thematically analysed by two independent researchers and interpreted following guidance from established methods in implementation science.

RESULTS

A total of 64 TGD patients and 9 gender-affirming healthcare professionals responded to the open-ended survey (mean (SD) age: 35 (16) and 48 (8), respectively). Four main themes emerged from the data: overall opinions and support for the PG-PROM-GAC, presentation of the PG-PROM-GAC, impact of gender clinic resources on PROM implementation and impact of PROM selection on implementation. Data were used to iterate the PG-PROM-GAC in response to participant feedback.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The PG-PROM-GAC is an acceptable and feasible resource that can be used by clinicians, researchers and policymakers to guide PROM implementation for gender-affirming care settings, helping to align gender-affirming care with patient needs.

摘要

重要性

为了推动基于证据的患者报告结局测量(PROM)在性别肯定护理中的应用,国际上已经进行了多次呼吁。《性别肯定护理中实施 PROM 的实用指南(PG-PROM-GAC)》是一个资源,可以帮助指导 PROM 的实施工作,该指南是使用参与式研究方法,与跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)患者和性别肯定保健专业人员合作分三个阶段开发的。然而,需要调查 TGD 患者和性别肯定保健专业人员对 PG-PROM-GAC 的看法和观点。

目的

通过分析开放式调查结果,调查患者和医疗保健专业人员对 PG-PROM-GAC 的看法。

设计

对 TGD 患者和性别肯定保健专业人员的开放式回答进行定性研究分析。

设置

参与者是从英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)性别诊所招募的。

参与者

在 NHS 性别诊所接受护理的患者和在 NHS 性别诊所工作的医疗保健专业人员有资格参加。通过电子邮件向符合条件的参与者发出了参加这项研究的邀请。

干预措施

参与者收到了一份开放式调查,以收集对 PG-PROM-GAC 的回应。

主要结果和测量

两位独立研究人员对数据进行了主题分析,并按照实施科学中既定方法的指导进行了解释。

结果

共有 64 名 TGD 患者和 9 名性别肯定保健专业人员对开放式调查做出了回应(平均(SD)年龄:35(16)和 48(8))。数据中出现了四个主要主题:对 PG-PROM-GAC 的总体看法和支持、PG-PROM-GAC 的呈现、性别诊所资源对 PROM 实施的影响以及 PROM 选择对实施的影响。根据参与者的反馈,对 PG-PROM-GAC 进行了迭代。

结论和相关性

PG-PROM-GAC 是一个可接受和可行的资源,临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者可以使用该资源来指导性别肯定护理环境中的 PROM 实施,帮助使性别肯定护理与患者需求保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3115/11002366/690eaec258af/bmjoq-2023-002721f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验