• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唇腭裂Q量表心理测量学协议:一项前瞻性观察研究,旨在调查唇腭裂Q量表的心理测量学特征、重测信度、反应度和可解释性。

CLEFT-Q SwePsych protocol: A prospective observational study to investigate the psychometric characteristics test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of CLEFT-Q.

作者信息

Stiernman Mia, Klintö Kristina, Wiedel Anna-Paulina, Schaar-Johansson Malin, Cornefjord Måns, Schönmeyr Björn, Stålhand Gudrun, Korduner Mikael, Bengtsson Martin, Mani Maria, Hakelius Malin, Peroz Roshan, Zötterman Johan, Cajander Jenny, Sjöström Mats, Weinfeld Justin, Persson Christina, Harrison Conrad, Allori Alexander, Miroshnychenko Anna, Becker Magnus

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0321021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321021. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321021
PMID:40334197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12058176/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patient perceived benefit of treatment for cleft lip and/or palate is of great importance since it is central to development of cleft care. CLEFT-Q is a cleft-specific questionnaire on health-related quality of life. Test-retest reliability, aspects of responsiveness and interpretability are yet to be established for CLEFT-Q. This study aims to investigate these psychometric characteristics of CLEFT-Q.

METHODS

To establish the test-retest reliability of CLEFT-Q, data will be collected repeatedly and independently at approximately 1-week intervals. Inclusion of approximately 50 patients is considered adequate for a test-retest study. To improve the interpretability of CLEFT-Q norm data from a control population of volunteers without a cleft will be collected. A total of approximately 210 participants will be included from schools, high-schools and universities. To test the responsiveness of CLEFT-Q, patients will answer selected subscales of CLEFT-Q, longitudinal anchor questions and perform global ratings of change before and after surgery. To ensure robust results, approximately 50 patients for each type of treatment will be recruited. If CLEFT-Q is found to be responsive, the pre- and postoperative difference in scores of CLEFT-Q will be compared with the change in objective measurements based on assessments by professionals in cleft care obtained in this study. To evaluate interpretability, results will be analysed to investigate the minimal important change using anchor-based, distribution-based and qualitative approach.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the ID 2021-06993-01.

摘要

目的

唇腭裂患者对治疗的感知益处非常重要,因为它是唇腭裂护理发展的核心。CLEFT-Q是一份关于健康相关生活质量的唇腭裂专用问卷。CLEFT-Q的重测信度、反应性和可解释性方面尚未确定。本研究旨在调查CLEFT-Q的这些心理测量特征。

方法

为了确定CLEFT-Q的重测信度,将以大约1周的间隔重复且独立地收集数据。对于重测研究,纳入约50名患者被认为是足够的。为了提高CLEFT-Q的可解释性,将收集来自无唇腭裂志愿者对照人群的常模数据。总共将从小学、高中和大学纳入约210名参与者。为了测试CLEFT-Q的反应性,患者将回答CLEFT-Q的选定子量表、纵向锚定问题,并在手术前后进行整体变化评分。为了确保结果可靠,每种治疗类型将招募约50名患者。如果发现CLEFT-Q有反应性,将把CLEFT-Q术前和术后得分的差异与基于本研究中唇腭裂护理专业人员评估的客观测量变化进行比较。为了评估可解释性,将使用基于锚定、基于分布和定性方法分析结果,以调查最小重要变化。

注册详情

本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符为2021-06993-01。

相似文献

1
CLEFT-Q SwePsych protocol: A prospective observational study to investigate the psychometric characteristics test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of CLEFT-Q.唇腭裂Q量表心理测量学协议:一项前瞻性观察研究,旨在调查唇腭裂Q量表的心理测量学特征、重测信度、反应度和可解释性。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0321021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321021. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
3
A systematic review of early speech interventions for children with cleft palate.腭裂儿童早期言语干预的系统评价
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):226-245. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12683. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
Infraorbital nerve block for postoperative pain following cleft lip repair in children.眶下神经阻滞用于儿童唇裂修复术后疼痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011131. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011131.pub2.
5
Validation of EuroQol instruments in paediatric patients and their caregivers in China: protocol for a prospective observational study.欧洲五维度健康量表在中国儿科患者及其照料者中的效度验证:一项前瞻性观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e102509. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102509.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Longitudinal validity of the Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL©) in a phase IIIb clinical trial population with hyperhidrosis: responsiveness and meaningful change.多汗症生活质量指数(HidroQoL©)在IIIb期多汗症临床试验人群中的纵向效度:反应性和有意义的变化
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Feb 18;192(3):450-457. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae415.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the optimal assessment of speech? A multicentre, international evaluation of speech assessment in 2500 patients with a cleft.何种评估方法最适合评估腭裂患者的语音?一项多中心、国际腭裂患者 2500 例的语音评估评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 28;13(12):e071571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071571.
2
Most Efficient and Meaningful Patient-Reported Appearance Assessment in Different Cleft Types and Age Groups with CLEFT-Q.CLEFT-Q 评估不同类型腭裂及不同年龄组患者最有效且最有意义的外貌评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jan 1;153(1):120e-129e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010523. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
3
Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity.
《CLEFT-Q 患者报告结局测量量表的心理测量学验证:一项考察横断面结构效度的前瞻性研究》。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Mar;60(3):327-335. doi: 10.1177/10556656211062837. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
4
A Prospective Study to Examine Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences (MIDs) for the CLEFT-Q Scales Following Three Cleft-Specific Operations.一项前瞻性研究,旨在评估三种特定于裂隙的手术治疗后,CLEFT-Q 量表的反应性和最小重要差异(MIDs)。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Apr;60(4):413-420. doi: 10.1177/10556656211064479. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
5
Toward a Conceptual and Methodological Shift in Craniofacial Research.迈向颅面研究中的概念与方法转变。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Jan;55(1):105-111. doi: 10.1177/1055665617721925. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
Responsiveness of quality of life measures in children with peripheral vascular malformations: The OVAMA project.外周血管畸形患儿生活质量测量指标的反应性:OVAMA项目
JPRAS Open. 2020 Nov 30;27:70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2020.11.013. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Concepts Important to Patients With Facial Differences: A Qualitative Study Informing a New Module of the FACE-Q for Children and Young Adults.对面部差异患者重要的概念:一项定性研究,为儿童和青少年的 FACE-Q 新模块提供信息。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Aug;58(8):1020-1031. doi: 10.1177/1055665620969589. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
8
Difference and Commonness Among CLP, NON-CLP Patients and Their Parents Seeking for Orthodontic Treatment: A Questionnaire Applying Q Methodology to Investigate Motives.寻求正畸治疗的唇腭裂患者、非唇腭裂患者及其父母之间的差异与共性:一项运用Q方法调查动机的问卷调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Dec 6;13:2047-2060. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S224254. eCollection 2019.
9
Computerised adaptive testing accurately predicts CLEFT-Q scores by selecting fewer, more patient-focused questions.计算机自适应测试通过选择更少、更关注患者的问题来准确预测唇腭裂问卷(CLEFT-Q)得分。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Nov;72(11):1819-1824. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
10
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.