• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variable Performance in 6 Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays May Affect Convalescent Plasma and Seroprevalence Screening.6 种商业 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂盒的性能存在差异,可能影响恢复期血浆和血清阳性筛查。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Feb 11;155(3):343-353. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa228.
2
Convalescent plasma therapy for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: Assessment of methods available for antibody detection and their correlation with neutralising antibody levels.恢复期血浆疗法治疗 COVID-19 患者:抗体检测方法评估及其与中和抗体水平的相关性。
Transfus Med. 2021 Jun;31(3):167-175. doi: 10.1111/tme.12746. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs.四种自动化免疫分析和三种 ELISA 评估针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白和核蛋白的抗体反应。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Nov;26(11):1557.e1-1557.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
4
Validation of Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in a Nigerian Population.在尼日利亚人群中验证商业 SARS-CoV-2 免疫测定。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0068021. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00680-21. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays.三种市售自动化免疫分析法检测 SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳和刺突抗体的比较。
Clin Biochem. 2021 Sep;95:77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
6
Diagnostic performance of four SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in patients with COVID-19 or with bacterial and non-SARS-CoV-2 viral respiratory infections.四种 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂在 COVID-19 患者及细菌性和非 SARS-CoV-2 病毒呼吸道感染患者中的诊断性能比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;40(9):1983-1997. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04285-4. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
7
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among potential convalescent plasma donors and analysis of their deferral pattern: Experience from tertiary care hospital in western India.印度西部一家三级护理医院的经验:潜在恢复期血浆供者中 SARS-CoV-2 的血清流行率及其延迟模式分析。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2022 Feb;29(1):60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Comparison of Two Automated Immunoassays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antibodies.两种自动化免疫分析检测 SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳抗体的比较。
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;6(2):429-440. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa175.
9
Comparative Performance of Five Commercially Available Serologic Assays To Detect Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and Identify Individuals with High Neutralizing Titers.五种市售血清学检测方法检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的性能比较及识别高中和抗体滴度个体。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jan 21;59(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02257-20.
10
SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays Dependent on Dual-Antigen Binding Demonstrate Diverging Kinetics Relative to Other Antibody Detection Methods.SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法依赖于双抗原结合,其动力学与其他抗体检测方法相比存在差异。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Aug 18;59(9):e0123121. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01231-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Efficacy of 11 SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays for COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.11种新型冠状病毒2型血清学检测方法对冠状病毒病的诊断效能:诊断试验准确性的Meta分析和校正间接比较
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Dec;12(12):e70114. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70114.
2
A Mixture Model for Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Chennai, India.用于估计印度钦奈地区 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率的混合模型。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Sep 1;192(9):1552-1561. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad103.
3
Comprehensive assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against various antigenic epitopes after naive COVID-19 infection and vaccination (BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19).新型冠状病毒感染和接种(BNT162b2 或 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)后针对各种抗原表位的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的综合评估。
Front Immunol. 2022 Dec 12;13:1038712. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1038712. eCollection 2022.
4
Prospective Evaluation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine Responses Across a Broad Spectrum of Immunocompromising Conditions: the COVID-19 Vaccination in the Immunocompromised Study (COVICS).广泛免疫抑制人群中新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)疫苗反应的前瞻性评估:免疫抑制人群中的 COVID-19 疫苗接种研究(COVICS)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e630-e644. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac103.
5
Development and validation of novel kit for quantification of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies on clinical samples.开发和验证用于在临床样本中定量检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的新型试剂盒。
J Virol Methods. 2022 Feb;300:114423. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114423. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
6
Etiological and pathophysiological enigmas of severe coronavirus disease 2019, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and Kawasaki disease.2019年冠状病毒病重症、儿童多系统炎症综合征及川崎病的病因学和病理生理学谜团
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2022 Apr;65(4):153-166. doi: 10.3345/cep.2021.01270. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
7
Clinical Evaluation of Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total Antibody assay and IgG assay using the Dimension EXL 200 in the Tokyo Metropolitan area.使用西门子Dimension EXL 200在东京都地区对SARS-CoV-2总抗体检测和IgG检测进行临床评估。
Heliyon. 2021 Nov;7(11):e08393. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08393. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in a large neuroimmunological patient cohort.大型神经免疫学患者队列中的新型冠状病毒2型抗体血清流行率
J Neurol. 2022 Mar;269(3):1133-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10818-w. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
9
Kinetics of Nucleocapsid, Spike and Neutralizing Antibodies, and Viral Load in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Treated with Convalescent Plasma.严重 COVID-19 患者接受恢复期血浆治疗后核衣壳、刺突和中和抗体以及病毒载量的动力学。
Viruses. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):1844. doi: 10.3390/v13091844.
10
Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibody Response in COVID-19 Patients Using Three Fully Automated Immunoassays and a Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test.使用三种全自动免疫测定法和替代病毒中和试验检测COVID-19患者中SARS-CoV-2刺突抗体的定量反应
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 19;11(8):1496. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081496.

6 种商业 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂盒的性能存在差异,可能影响恢复期血浆和血清阳性筛查。

Variable Performance in 6 Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays May Affect Convalescent Plasma and Seroprevalence Screening.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

School of Computing and Information, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Feb 11;155(3):343-353. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa228.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqaa228
PMID:33155015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7665309/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Serologic detection of prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is needed for definition of convalescent plasma donors, for confounding SARS-CoV-2 presentation, and for seroprevalence studies. Reliable serologic assays with independent validation are required.

METHODS

Six SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays from Beckman Coulter, Euroimmun (IgG, IgA), Roche, and Siemens (Centaur, Vista) were assessed for specificity (n = 184), sensitivity (n = 154), and seroconversion in a defined cohort with clinical correlates and molecular SARS-CoV-2 results.

RESULTS

Assay specificity was 99% or greater for all assays except the Euroimmun IgA (95%). Sensitivity at more than 21 days from symptom onset was 84%, 95%, 72%, 98%, 67%, and 96% for Beckman Coulter, Centaur, Vista, Roche, Euroimmun IgA, and Euroimmun IgG, respectively. Average day of seroconversion was similar between assays (8-10 d), with 2 patients not producing nucleocapsid antibodies during hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies may be less reliably produced early in disease than spike protein antibodies. Assessment of convalescent plasma donors at more than 30 days from symptom onset and seroprevalence studies should use assays with defined sensitivity at time points of interest because not all assays detected antibodies reliably at more than 30 days.

摘要

目的

需要血清学检测来确定恢复期血浆捐献者,排除 SARS-CoV-2 感染的干扰,并进行血清流行率研究。需要具有独立验证的可靠血清学检测方法。

方法

评估了来自贝克曼库尔特、欧蒙(IgG、IgA)、罗氏和西门子(Centaur、Vista)的 6 种 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测方法,以评估其特异性(n=184)、敏感性(n=154)和在具有临床相关性和分子 SARS-CoV-2 结果的定义队列中的血清转化。

结果

除了欧蒙 IgA(95%)外,所有检测方法的特异性均为 99%或更高。在症状出现后 21 天以上,贝克曼库尔特、Centaur、Vista、罗氏、欧蒙 IgA 和欧蒙 IgG 的敏感性分别为 84%、95%、72%、98%、67%和 96%。各检测方法的平均血清转化日相似(8-10 天),有 2 例患者在住院期间未产生核衣壳抗体。

结论

与刺突蛋白抗体相比,SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳抗体在疾病早期的产生可能不太可靠。应在症状出现后 30 天以上对恢复期血浆捐献者进行评估,并且在有意义的时间点应使用具有明确敏感性的检测方法进行血清流行率研究,因为并非所有检测方法在 30 天以上都能可靠地检测到抗体。