• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种自动化免疫分析和三种 ELISA 评估针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白和核蛋白的抗体反应。

Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs.

机构信息

Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Centre for Respiratory Pathogens, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Laboratory of Microbiology, Jan Yperman Hospital, Ieper, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Nov;26(11):1557.e1-1557.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.038
PMID:32745595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7834107/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein using four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs for the detection of total Ig antibodies (Roche) or IgG (Abbott, Diasorin, Snibe, Euroimmun, Mikrogen) in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

Sensitivity and dynamic trend to seropositivity were evaluated in 233 samples from 114 patients with moderate, severe or critical COVID-19 confirmed with PCR on nasopharyngeal swab. Specificity was evaluated in 113 samples collected before January 2020, including 24 samples from patients with non-SARS coronavirus infection.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for all assays was 100% (95% confidence interval 83.7-100) 3 weeks after onset of symptoms. Specificity varied between 94.7% (88.7-97.8) and 100% (96.1-100). Calculated at the cut-offs that corresponded to a specificity of 95% and 97.5%, Roche had the highest sensitivity (85.0% (79.8-89.0) and 81.1% (76.6-85.7), p < 0.05 except vs. Abbott). Seroconversion occurred on average 2 days earlier for Roche total Ig anti-N and the three IgG anti-N assays (Abbott, Mikrogen, Euroimmun) than for the two IgG anti-S assays (Diasorin, Euroimmun) (≥50% seroconversion day 9-10 vs. day 11-12 and p < 0.05 for percent seropositive patients day 9-10 to 17-18). There was no significant difference in the IgG antibody time to seroconversion between critical and non-critical patients.

DISCUSSION

Seroconversion occurred within 3 weeks after onset of symptoms with all assays and on average 2 days earlier for assays detecting IgG or total Ig anti-N than for IgG anti-S. The specificity of assays detecting anti-N was comparable to anti-S and excellent in a challenging control population.

摘要

目的

使用四种自动化免疫分析和三种 ELISA 检测试剂盒(罗氏、雅培、迪亚森、Snibe、欧蒙、美康)检测总 Ig 抗体(罗氏)或 IgG(雅培、迪亚森、Snibe、欧蒙、美康),以确定针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白和核蛋白的抗体反应。

方法

评估了 233 份来自 114 例经鼻咽拭子 PCR 确诊的中度、重度或危重新冠肺炎患者的样本的敏感性和血清阳性的动态趋势。在 2020 年 1 月之前采集的 113 份样本中评估了特异性,其中包括 24 份非 SARS 冠状病毒感染患者的样本。

结果

所有检测方法的敏感性均为 100%(95%置信区间 83.7-100),症状出现后 3 周。特异性在 94.7%(88.7-97.8)和 100%(96.1-100)之间变化。在特异性为 95%和 97.5%对应的截定点计算时,罗氏的敏感性最高(85.0%(79.8-89.0)和 81.1%(76.6-85.7),除与雅培相比外,p<0.05)。罗氏总 Ig 抗-N 和三种 IgG 抗-N 检测试剂盒(雅培、美康、欧蒙)的血清转换平均比两种 IgG 抗-S 检测试剂盒(迪亚森、欧蒙)早 2 天(≥50%血清转换第 9-10 天 vs. 第 11-12 天,p<0.05)(第 9-10 天至第 17-18 天阳性患者的百分比血清阳性)。危重症和非危重症患者 IgG 抗体血清转换时间无显著差异。

讨论

所有检测方法均在症状出现后 3 周内发生血清转换,与检测 IgG 或总 Ig 抗-N 的检测试剂盒相比,IgG 抗-S 的检测试剂盒的血清转换平均早 2 天。检测抗-N 的检测试剂盒的特异性与抗-S 相当,在具有挑战性的对照人群中表现出色。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8984/7834107/839c0803390f/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8984/7834107/7a4297293475/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8984/7834107/519c573714cd/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8984/7834107/839c0803390f/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8984/7834107/7a4297293475/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8984/7834107/519c573714cd/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8984/7834107/839c0803390f/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs.四种自动化免疫分析和三种 ELISA 评估针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白和核蛋白的抗体反应。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Nov;26(11):1557.e1-1557.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
SARS-CoV-2 S1 and N-based serological assays reveal rapid seroconversion and induction of specific antibody response in COVID-19 patients.SARS-CoV-2 S1 和 N 基于的血清学检测方法显示 COVID-19 患者中快速的血清转化和特异性抗体应答的诱导。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 6;10(1):16561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73491-5.
3
Evaluation of a novel multiplexed assay for determining IgG levels and functional activity to SARS-CoV-2.评估一种新型多重分析检测方法,用于测定 IgG 水平和针对 SARS-CoV-2 的功能活性。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Sep;130:104572. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104572. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
4
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 through the evaluation of three immunoassays: Two automated immunoassays (Euroimmun and Abbott) and one rapid lateral flow immunoassay (NG Biotech).评估三种免疫测定法(Euroimmun 和 Abbott 的两种自动化免疫测定法以及 NG Biotech 的一种快速侧向流动免疫测定法)用于诊断 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104511. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104511. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
5
Sensitivity in Detection of Antibodies to Nucleocapsid and Spike Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒病患者中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 核衣壳蛋白和刺突蛋白抗体检测的敏感性。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 29;222(2):206-213. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa273.
6
Analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma for SARS-CoV-2 IgG using two commercial immunoassays.采用两种商业免疫分析法分析 COVID-19 恢复期血浆中的 SARS-CoV-2 IgG。
J Immunol Methods. 2020 Nov;486:112837. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2020.112837. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
7
Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.基于核衣壳蛋白和刺突蛋白的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0237828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237828. eCollection 2020.
8
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Health Care Workers: A Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Three Commercially Available Antibody Assays.SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测在医护人员中的应用:三种市售抗体检测试剂盒的临床性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0039121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00391-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
9
Monitoring antibody response following SARS-CoV-2 infection: diagnostic efficiency of 4 automated immunoassays.监测 SARS-CoV-2 感染后的抗体反应:4 种自动化免疫分析的诊断效率。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;98(3):115140. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115140. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
10
Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgM and IgG responses in COVID-19 patients.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中 SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgM 和 IgG 反应的动力学。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):940-948. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1762515.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of undetected SARS-CoV-2 infections by clustering of Nucleocapsid antibody trajectories.通过核衣壳抗体轨迹聚类识别未检测到的新冠病毒感染
Nat Commun. 2025 May 14;16(1):4466. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57370-z.
2
SARS-CoV-2 humoral immune responses in convalescent individuals over 12 months reveal severity-dependent antibody dynamics.康复超过12个月的个体中SARS-CoV-2的体液免疫反应揭示了严重程度依赖性抗体动态变化。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 2;5(1):149. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00828-4.
3
Anti-nucleocapsid and anti-spike antibody trajectories in people with post-covid condition versus acute-only infections: a nested longitudinal case-control study within the Virus Watch prospective cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: kinetics, correlates of protection, and association with severity.冠状病毒抗体介导免疫的系统评价:动力学、保护相关性及与严重程度的关系。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 17;11(1):4704. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18450-4.
2
Comparison of the diagnostic performance with whole blood and plasma of four rapid antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2.四种SARS-CoV-2快速抗体检测方法对全血和血浆诊断性能的比较。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Sep 25;58(10):e197-e199. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0817.
3
Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.
新冠后综合征患者与仅急性感染患者的抗核衣壳和抗刺突抗体轨迹:病毒监测前瞻性队列中的一项嵌套纵向病例对照研究
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 17;16(1):3686. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58766-7.
4
Pan-Variant SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Induce Protective Immunity by Targeting Conserved Epitopes.泛变体严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2疫苗通过靶向保守表位诱导保护性免疫。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Apr;12(16):e2409919. doi: 10.1002/advs.202409919. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
5
Reflections on COVID-19: A Literature Review of SARS-CoV-2 Testing.关于新冠疫情的思考:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2检测的文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Dec 26;13(1):9. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13010009.
6
Diagnostic Efficacy of 11 SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays for COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.11种新型冠状病毒2型血清学检测方法对冠状病毒病的诊断效能:诊断试验准确性的Meta分析和校正间接比较
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Dec;12(12):e70114. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70114.
7
Implementation of an Immunoassay Based on the MVA-T7pol-Expression System for Rapid Identification of Immunogenic SARS-CoV-2 Antigens: A Proof-of-Concept Study.基于 MVA-T7pol 表达系统的免疫测定法在快速鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 免疫原性抗原中的应用:概念验证研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 10;25(20):10898. doi: 10.3390/ijms252010898.
8
Comprehensive Study of the IBMP ELISA IgA/IgM/IgG COVID-19 Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection.用于SARS-CoV-2抗体检测的IBMP ELISA IgA/IgM/IgG新冠病毒试剂盒的综合研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 13;14(14):1514. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141514.
9
Assessing the performance of commercial serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.评估用于SARS-CoV-2诊断的商业血清学检测的性能。
IJID Reg. 2024 Jun 1;12:100383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100383. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
High interleukin-6 levels induced by COVID-19 pneumonia correlate with increased circulating follicular helper T cell frequency and strong neutralization antibody response in the acute phase of Omicron breakthrough infection.新冠病毒肺炎引起的高白细胞介素-6 水平与奥密克戎突破性感染急性期循环滤泡辅助 T 细胞频率增加和强烈的中和抗体反应相关。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 17;15:1377014. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1377014. eCollection 2024.
无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的临床和免疫学评估。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0965-6. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
Diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM antibody tests and the Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA in COVID-19 patients.在 COVID-19 患者中,七种快速 IgG/IgM 抗体检测试剂盒与 Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA 的诊断性能比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Aug;26(8):1082-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Whole Nucleocapsid Protein of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 May Cause False-Positive Results in Serological Assays.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的全核衣壳蛋白可能在血清学检测中导致假阳性结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;72(7):1291-1292. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa637.
6
A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans.用于检测人类 SARS-CoV-2 血清转化的血清学检测方法。
Nat Med. 2020 Jul;26(7):1033-1036. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0913-5. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应。
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):845-848. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
8
Serological assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), March 2020.2020 年 3 月用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的血清学检测。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(16). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.16.2000421.
9
IgA-Ab response to spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: A longitudinal study.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突糖蛋白的 IgA 抗体反应:一项纵向研究。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Aug;507:164-166. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
10
Profile of Immunoglobulin G and IgM Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的免疫球蛋白G和IgM抗体概况
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2255-2258. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa489.