• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰剖宫产术后阴道分娩预测模型的外部验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。

External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2020 Nov 6;49(3):357-363. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0308. Print 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1515/jpm-2020-0308
PMID:33155996
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Discussing the individual probability of a successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) can support decision making. The aim of this study is to externally validate a prediction model for the probability of a VBAC in a Dutch population.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study in 12 Dutch hospitals, 586 women intending VBAC were included. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with a cephalic foetal presentation, delivery after 37 weeks and one previous caesarean section (CS) and preference for intending VBAC. The studied prediction model included six predictors: pre-pregnancy body mass index, previous vaginal delivery, previous CS because of non-progressive labour, Caucasian ethnicity, induction of current labour, and estimated foetal weight ≥90th percentile. The discriminative and predictive performance of the model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calibration plots.

RESULTS

The area under the curve was 0.73 (CI 0.69-0.78). The average predicted probability of a VBAC according to the prediction model was 70.3% (range 33-92%). The actual VBAC rate was 71.7%. The calibration plot shows some overestimation for low probabilities of VBAC and an underestimation of high probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction model showed good performance and was externally validated in a Dutch population. Hence it can be implemented as part of counselling for mode of delivery in women choosing between intended VBAC or planned CS after previous CS.

摘要

目的

讨论剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)成功的个体可能性可以支持决策。本研究的目的是在荷兰人群中对外科 VBAC 概率预测模型进行验证。

方法

在这项来自 12 家荷兰医院的前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了 586 名打算 VBAC 的女性。纳入标准为单胎妊娠,头位,孕 37 周后分娩,且有一次剖宫产史和 VBAC 意愿。所研究的预测模型包括 6 个预测因素:孕前体重指数、既往阴道分娩史、因产程无进展而进行的剖宫产史、白种人、本次分娩的引产和估计胎儿体重≥第 90 百分位数。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析和校准图评估模型的判别和预测性能。

结果

曲线下面积为 0.73(95%CI:0.69-0.78)。根据预测模型,VBAC 的平均预测概率为 70.3%(范围:33%-92%)。实际 VBAC 率为 71.7%。校准图显示 VBAC 概率低时存在高估,高概率时存在低估。

结论

该预测模型在荷兰人群中表现出良好的性能,并得到了外部验证。因此,它可以作为有剖宫产史的女性在选择 VBAC 或计划性 CS 之间的咨询的一部分,用于指导分娩方式。

相似文献

1
External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study.荷兰剖宫产术后阴道分娩预测模型的外部验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Perinat Med. 2020 Nov 6;49(3):357-363. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0308. Print 2021 Mar 26.
2
Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate.预测既往剖宫产术后成功阴道分娩:高计划阴道分娩率的荷兰全国基于注册的队列中两种预测模型的外部验证。
BJOG. 2014 Jun;121(7):840-7; discussion 847. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12605. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
3
Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term.剖宫产后阴道分娩:一项基于西欧人群的足月分娩预测模型的建立。
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):194-201; discussion 201. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12539.
4
Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section.预测既往有一次剖宫产史后计划阴道分娩成功率的产前评分系统。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;38(3):339-343. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1355896. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.剖宫产术后阴道分娩预测模型的验证
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Feb;35(2):119-124. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)31015-X.
6
Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China.预测剖宫产术后阴道分娩的成功率:中国的一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e027807. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027807.
7
Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery.剖宫产术后试产成功的预测——既往阴道分娩的益处
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(16):2665-70. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1099156. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Predicting vaginal birth after caesarean section: Validation of the Grobman model in a New Zealand population.预测剖宫产术后阴道分娩:新西兰人群中 Grobman 模型的验证。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;62(5):658-663. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13516. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
9
Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: Validation of a prediction model.评估澳大利亚某地区剖宫产术后阴道分娩的成功率:预测模型的验证
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Feb;59(1):66-70. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12809. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Mode of birth after caesarean section: individual prediction scores using Scottish population data.剖宫产术后分娩方式:使用苏格兰人群数据的个体预测评分。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2226-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Models for predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: scoping review.剖宫产术后阴道分娩预测模型:范围综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07101-x.
2
Temporal analysis of mortality from preventable causes in the first 24 hours of life, 2000-2021.2000-2021 年生命最初 24 小时内可预防死因的时间分析。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023 Dec 4;31:e4079. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6696.4079. eCollection 2023.