Suppr超能文献

经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中骨水泥渗漏的危险因素:对1456例使用低粘度骨水泥强化椎体的分析

Risk Factors for Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: An Analysis of 1456 Vertebrae Augmented by Low-Viscosity Bone Cement.

作者信息

Tang Benqiang, Cui Libin, Chen Xueming, Liu Yadong

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Feb 15;46(4):216-222. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003773.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) using low-viscosity bone cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cement leakage is the most common complication for PVP and its risk factors have been discussed. However, data in previous series were heterogeneous. Additionally, relative smaller patient sample or more types of cement leakage classified in those studies made the results conflicting.

METHODS

A total of 1090 patients who underwent PVP with low-viscosity bone cement for OVCFs in 1456 levels between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters potentially affecting the occurrence of cement leakage were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Cement leakage was assessed using postoperative computed tomography scanning, and classified into two types (cortical leakage and venous leakage) considering the mechanism.

RESULTS

The incidence of cortical and venous leakage were 20.3% (295/1456) and 56.2% (819/1456), respectively. Cortical disruption, basivertebral foramen were the strongest risk factors for cortical leakage (P = 0.000), venous leakage (P = 0.000), respectively. Greater cement volume is one risk factor for both cortical leakage and venous leakage. The intravertebral cleft, solid type of cement distribution were significant risk factors for cortical leakage, and they both were protective factors for venous leakage. For cortical leakage, older age and trauma were another two risk factors. For venous leakage, female was another one risk factor, and higher grade of fracture severity is the strongest protective factor.

CONCLUSION

Both cortical leakage and venous leakage are prevalent. Adequate known of risk factors could help balance the incidence of two type leakage in unique vertebra and reduce the incidence of leakage in general in PVP for OVCFs.Level of Evidence: 3.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性研究。

目的

确定使用低粘度骨水泥经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)时骨水泥渗漏的危险因素。

背景数据总结

骨水泥渗漏是PVP最常见的并发症,其危险因素已被讨论。然而,以往系列研究中的数据存在异质性。此外,这些研究中相对较小的患者样本或更多类型的骨水泥渗漏分类使得结果相互矛盾。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年6月期间1090例接受低粘度骨水泥PVP治疗OVCFs的患者,共1456个椎体节段。使用单因素和多因素分析评估可能影响骨水泥渗漏发生的参数。通过术后计算机断层扫描评估骨水泥渗漏情况,并根据其机制分为两种类型(皮质渗漏和静脉渗漏)。

结果

皮质渗漏和静脉渗漏的发生率分别为20.3%(295/1456)和56.2%(819/1456)。皮质破坏、椎基底孔分别是皮质渗漏(P = 0.000)、静脉渗漏(P = 0.000)的最强危险因素。骨水泥用量增加是皮质渗漏和静脉渗漏的共同危险因素。椎体内裂隙、骨水泥分布的实体类型是皮质渗漏的显著危险因素,而它们都是静脉渗漏的保护因素。对于皮质渗漏,年龄较大和外伤是另外两个危险因素。对于静脉渗漏,女性是另一个危险因素,而骨折严重程度较高是最强的保护因素。

结论

皮质渗漏和静脉渗漏都很常见。充分了解危险因素有助于平衡单个椎体中两种类型渗漏的发生率,并总体上降低OVCFs的PVP中渗漏的发生率。证据级别:3。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验