• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以人为中心的治疗关系在物理治疗量表中的心理测量特性。

The psychometric properties of the person-centered therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy scale.

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, SALBIS Research Group, Campus de Ponferrada, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, León, Spain.

Physical Therapy Department, CEU Universities, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, Elche, Alicante.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):e0241010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241010. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0241010
PMID:33156867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647106/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the psychometric properties of the Person-Centered Therapeutic Relationship in Physiotherapy Scale (PCTR-PT) in order to find the most appropriate fit for the tool.

METHODS

Patients who had received treatment at the physiotherapy service of nine hospitals in Spain were invited to complete the 31 items of the PCTR-PT scale. To select the most appropriate items of the PCTR-PT, an exploratory factorial analysis (EFA) was performed using the maximum likelihood and oblique rotation (promin) methods. Factor validity, goodness-of-fit and psychometric properties were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent (CFA) and discriminant validity were calculated. Internal consistency was verified using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to examine temporal stability.

RESULTS

366 patients over 18 years old who had received, at least, 15 physiotherapy treatment sessions completed the questionnaire. The results of the exploratory factor analysis revealed a tool with 15 items in four factors [Relational Bond (N items = 4); Individualized Partnership (N items = 4); Professional Empowerment (N items = 3) and Therapeutic Communication (N items = 4)], explaining 78.4% of the variance of the total variables of this tool. The confirmatory factor analysis further confirmed the four-structure model. Reliability of the tool was approved by Cronbach's alpha in all four dimensions, as all were above .70, ranging from .84 (Individualized Partnership) to .91 (Professional Empowerment). = 0.94. Test-retest was performed with two-week intervals, indicating an appropriate stability for the scale (ICC = 0.900).

CONCLUSION

The Person-Centered Therapeutic Relationship in Physiotherapy Scale (PCTR-PT) is a useful, valid and applicable instrument to evaluate the person-centered therapeutic relationship during physiotherapy interventions. It would be interesting to investigate the predictive capacity (sensitivity and specificity) of the PCTR-PT scale.

摘要

目的

确定以人为中心的物理治疗治疗关系量表(PCTR-PT)的心理计量学特性,以找到该工具最合适的拟合度。

方法

邀请在西班牙 9 家医院的物理治疗服务中接受治疗的患者完成 PCTR-PT 量表的 31 个项目。为了选择最合适的 PCTR-PT 项目,使用最大似然和斜交旋转(promin)方法进行了探索性因子分析(EFA)。通过验证性因子分析(CFA)分析因子有效性、拟合优度和心理计量学特性。计算了收敛(CFA)和判别有效性。使用 Cronbach 的 alpha 系数验证内部一致性。使用组内相关系数(ICC)检查时间稳定性。

结果

366 名 18 岁以上接受至少 15 次物理治疗的患者完成了问卷。探索性因子分析的结果显示,该工具具有 4 个因子的 15 个项目[关系纽带(N 个项目=4);个性化合作(N 个项目=4);专业授权(N 个项目=3)和治疗性沟通(N 个项目=4)],解释了该工具总变量的 78.4%。验证性因子分析进一步证实了四结构模型。该工具的可靠性通过四个维度的 Cronbach 的 alpha 得到了验证,所有维度都高于.70,范围从.84(个性化合作)到.91(专业授权)。α=0.94。在两周的间隔内进行了测试-重测,表明该量表具有适当的稳定性(ICC=0.900)。

结论

以人为中心的物理治疗治疗关系量表(PCTR-PT)是一种有用、有效和适用的工具,可用于评估物理治疗干预过程中的以人为中心的治疗关系。研究 PCTR-PT 量表的预测能力(敏感性和特异性)将很有趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1513/7647106/9b95f80373ff/pone.0241010.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1513/7647106/9b95f80373ff/pone.0241010.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1513/7647106/9b95f80373ff/pone.0241010.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The psychometric properties of the person-centered therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy scale.以人为中心的治疗关系在物理治疗量表中的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):e0241010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241010. eCollection 2020.
2
Adaptation of the person centered therapeutic relationship patient version (PCTR-PT) to a version for physiotherapists (PCTR-PHYS) and evaluation of its psychometric properties.适应以人为中心的治疗关系患者版(PCTR-PT)为物理治疗师版(PCTR-PHYS),并评估其心理测量特性。
Physiother Res Int. 2023 Oct;28(4):e2007. doi: 10.1002/pri.2007. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
4
Development and psychometric properties of a scale for measuring internal participation from a patient and health care professional perspective.从患者和医疗保健专业人员的角度出发,开发并验证了一种用于衡量内部参与度的量表的心理测量学特性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 1;13:374. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-374.
5
The pain attitudes and beliefs scale for physiotherapists: development and psychometric assessment of the Spanish version among physiotherapy students.物理治疗师疼痛态度和信念量表:物理治疗学生西班牙语版的编制与心理测量评估。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Jul;40(7):1436-1446. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2190396. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
6
Development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student Tuberculosis (TB) Patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China.中国学生结核病患者(STBP)知识、态度和实践(KAP)问卷的编制及心理测量学检验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 8;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3122-9.
7
Designing and psychometric evaluation of disease-related fear scale (D-RFS) in adults with epilepsy: A sequential exploratory mixed methods design.成人癫痫患者疾病相关恐惧量表(D-RFS)的设计和心理计量学评估:序贯探索性混合方法设计。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107169. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107169. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
8
Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Finnish version of the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale.芬兰版卫生保健提供者疼痛与功能障碍关系量表的心理测量学特性和因子结构。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Feb;57:102471. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102471. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
9
The Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool in Nursing Homes: Psychometric Evaluation of the Italian Version.养老院以患者为中心的护理评估工具:意大利语版本的心理计量学评估。
J Nurs Meas. 2020 Dec 1;28(3):555-563. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-18-00090. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
10
Psychometric properties of fertility desire scale (FDS) developed for Iranian parents.生育愿望量表(FDS)在伊朗父母中的心理测量学特性。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7413-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Person-Centered Therapeutic Relationship in Physiotherapy Scale to European Portuguese.以患者为中心的物理治疗关系量表在欧洲葡萄牙语中的跨文化适应与验证。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;12(23):2455. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232455.
2
[Respiratory physiotherapy in post-COVID-19: a decision-making algorithm for clinical practice].[新型冠状病毒肺炎康复后的呼吸物理治疗:临床实践决策算法]
Open Respir Arch. 2021 Oct 12;4(1):100139. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2021.100139. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
3
Why Measure Patient Experience in Physical Therapy?

本文引用的文献

1
A state-of-the-art review of direct observation tools for assessing competency in person-centred care.人本位护理能力评估直接观察工具的最新研究综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103634. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review.无论如何,中心是谁的?在护理中定义以人(患者)为中心的护理:综合评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229923. eCollection 2020.
3
Construction and content validation of a measurement tool to evaluate person-centered therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy services.
为什么要衡量物理治疗中的患者体验?
Arch Physiother. 2021 May 3;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00105-2.
构建并验证评估物理治疗服务中以患者为中心的治疗关系的测量工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228916. eCollection 2020.
4
Patients' experience regarding therapeutic person-centered relationships in physiotherapy services: A qualitative study.患者对物理治疗服务中治疗性以人为主的关系的体验:一项定性研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jan;37(1):17-27. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1603258. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
5
Person-centered rehabilitation care and outcomes: A systematic literature review.以人为中心的康复护理及效果:系统文献回顾。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 May;93:74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
6
How is patient involvement measured in patient centeredness scales for health professionals? A systematic review of their measurement properties and content.如何在以患者为中心的卫生专业人员量表中衡量患者的参与度?对其测量特性和内容的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3798-y.
7
"Same same or different?" A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care.“相同还是不同?”对以患者为中心和以患者为中心的护理的综述的综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
8
Physical therapists' perceptions and experiences about barriers and facilitators of therapeutic patient-centred relationships during outpatient rehabilitation: a qualitative study.物理治疗师对门诊康复治疗中以患者为中心的治疗关系的障碍和促进因素的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):484-492. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
The necessary conditions of engagement for the therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy: an interpretive description study.物理治疗中治疗关系建立的必要条件:一项诠释性描述研究。
Arch Physiother. 2018 Feb 17;8:3. doi: 10.1186/s40945-018-0044-1. eCollection 2018.
10
A framework for establishing connections in physiotherapy practice.一个在物理治疗实践中建立联系的框架。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Jan;35(1):40-56. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1434707. Epub 2018 Feb 12.