Suppr超能文献

非中性粒细胞减少 ICU 败血症患者念珠菌定植与侵袭性念珠菌病的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Candida colonization as a predictor of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic ICU patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.092. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Candida colonization is a risk factor for the development of invasive candidiasis. This study sought to estimate the magnitude of this association, and determine if this information can be used to guide empirical antifungal therapy initiation in critically ill septic patients.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were systematically reviewed for all published studies evaluating predictors of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients with sepsis. Meta-analysis was used to determine the pooled odds ratio for invasive candidiasis among colonized versus non-colonized patients. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (+LR, -LR) were then calculated by considering the presence/absence of Candida colonization as the diagnostic test, and the presence/absence of invasive candidiasis as the disease of interest.

RESULTS

Out of 9825 patients in the 10 eligible studies, 3886 (40%) were colonized with Candida and 462 patients (4.7%) developed invasive candidiasis. Meta-analysis indicated that critically ill patients with sepsis who are colonized with candida are more likely to develop invasive candidiasis (odds ratio 3.32; 95% CI 1.68-6.58) compared with non-colonized patients. The pooled SN was 75.2% (95% CI 59.6-86.2%), while the pooled SP was 49.2% (95% CI 33.2-65.3%).The NPV of Candida colonization was high (96.9%; 95% CI 92.0-98.9%), but the PPV was low (9.1%; 95% CI 5.5-14.6%).

CONCLUSION

Candida colonization is strongly associated with the likelihood of invasive candidiasis among ICU patients with sepsis. Available data argue against initiating empirical antifungal treatment in non-neutropenic septic patients without prior documented Candida colonization.

摘要

背景

念珠菌定植是侵袭性念珠菌病发展的一个危险因素。本研究旨在评估这种关联的程度,并确定这些信息是否可用于指导重症监护病房(ICU)脓毒症患者经验性抗真菌治疗的启动。

方法

系统检索 PubMed/MEDLINE 和 Embase 数据库,以获取评估 ICU 脓毒症患者侵袭性念珠菌病预测因素的所有已发表研究。采用荟萃分析评估定植与非定植患者中侵袭性念珠菌病的合并优势比。然后,通过将念珠菌定植的存在/缺失视为诊断试验,将侵袭性念珠菌病的存在/缺失视为感兴趣的疾病,计算敏感性(SN)、特异性(SP)、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV、NPV)以及阳性和阴性似然比(+LR、-LR)。

结果

在 10 项符合条件的研究中,共有 9825 例患者,其中 3886 例(40%)定植了念珠菌,462 例(4.7%)发生了侵袭性念珠菌病。荟萃分析表明,与非定植患者相比,患有败血症的重症患者如果定植了念珠菌,更有可能发生侵袭性念珠菌病(优势比 3.32;95%CI 1.68-6.58)。合并 SN 为 75.2%(95%CI 59.6-86.2%),而合并 SP 为 49.2%(95%CI 33.2-65.3%)。念珠菌定植的 NPV 较高(96.9%;95%CI 92.0-98.9%),但 PPV 较低(9.1%;95%CI 5.5-14.6%)。

结论

念珠菌定植与 ICU 脓毒症患者侵袭性念珠菌病的发生密切相关。现有数据不支持在没有先前记录的念珠菌定植的情况下,对非中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症患者进行经验性抗真菌治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验