Faculty of Health and Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada.
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02115, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 4;17(21):8146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218146.
While greenness has been associated with lower depression, the generalizability of this association in arid landscapes remains undetermined. We assessed the association between depression and residential greenness, but also brownness and grayness among nursing students living in El Paso, Texas (the Chihuahuan desert).
Depression was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scale and greenness with the normalized difference vegetation index across three buffer sizes (i.e., 250, 500, and 1000 m). Using data from the National Land Cover Database, two additional measures of land patterns were analyzed: grayness and brownness. Structural equation models were used to assess the relationships of these land patterns to depression and quantify the indirect effects of peer alienation.
After adjusting for individual characteristics, at buffers 250 m, greenness was not associated with a decrease in the Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) of depression (IRR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.12-2.10); however, grayness and brownness were respectively associated with increases by 64% (IRR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.07-2.52) and decreases by 35% (IRR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.99). At buffer 250 m, peer alienation explained 17.43% (95% CI, -1.79-36.66) of the association between depression and brownness, suggesting a pathway to depression.
We did not observe an association between depression and residential greenness in El Paso, Texas. However, we did observe a protective association between brownness and depression and an adverse association with grayness. These results have theoretical implications as they were based on commonly used frameworks in this literature, and adverse association of brownness (and the lack of greenness) and depression was expected.
虽然绿色环境与较低的抑郁水平有关,但这种关联在干旱景观中的普遍性尚不确定。我们评估了德克萨斯州埃尔帕索(奇瓦瓦沙漠)护理学生的抑郁与居住绿化、棕色化和灰色化之间的关系。
使用患者健康问卷-9 量表测量抑郁,使用归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)测量三个缓冲区大小(250、500 和 1000 米)的绿化程度。利用国家土地覆盖数据库的数据,分析了另外两个土地格局指标:灰色化和棕色化。结构方程模型用于评估这些土地格局与抑郁之间的关系,并量化同伴疏远的间接影响。
在调整了个体特征后,在 250 米缓冲区中,绿化与抑郁发生率比值(IRR)的降低无关(IRR,0.51;95%置信区间,0.12-2.10);然而,灰色化和棕色化分别与增加 64%(IRR,1.64;95%置信区间,1.07-2.52)和减少 35%(IRR,0.65;95%置信区间,0.42-0.99)有关。在 250 米缓冲区中,同伴疏远解释了抑郁与棕色化之间 17.43%(95%置信区间,-1.79-36.66)的关联,表明存在一条通向抑郁的途径。
我们没有观察到德克萨斯州埃尔帕索的抑郁与居住绿化之间存在关联。然而,我们确实观察到棕色化与抑郁之间存在保护关联,与灰色化之间存在不利关联。这些结果具有理论意义,因为它们基于该文献中常用的框架,并且预期棕色化(和缺乏绿化)与抑郁之间存在不利关联。