Department of Accident and Trauma, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Basic Science, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;16(4):1043-1049. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02547-1. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
The beard is a well-known cause of difficult mask ventilation due to excessive air leaks. Various techniques have been proposed to overcome this difficulty, such as applying a gel on the mask edge. Our objective was to determine whether the gel technique will improve ventilation and to assess the comfort of the provider. A randomized crossover design was conducted to assess the efficacy of gel in a bearded simulation model. Respiratory therapists (RT) were recruited by convenience sampling to hold the mask using a two-handed technique for a two-minute ventilation session. During the session, the ventilator provided a fixed Tidal Volume (TV) of 550 mL and a respiratory rate of 12 per minute, and the simulated model measured the received volumes. We compared the median TV and number of failed ventilation attempts with or without the gel. The comfort level while using the gel was assessed with constructed questions. We recruited 74 respiratory therapists working in Riyadh city. More than half of the participants had more than 5 years experience. The median tidal volume for standard mask ventilation without the gel was 283 mL [interquartile range (IQR) 224, 327], whereas that with the gel was 467 mL [451, 478], respectively (p < 0.01). The number of successful ventilations was recorded out of 24 breaths during the 2-min ventilation period for each technique; the proportion of successful ventilations increased significantly by 65% (95% CI 51-75%, p < 0.01) with the gel. In addition, only nine participants believed the technique was not comfortable, while the remaining individuals found it comfortable or natural. In our bearded simulation model, applying the gel significantly improved ventilation without negatively affecting comfort. Further studies and education are encouraged in the field of basic airway management.
胡须是导致口罩通气困难的一个众所周知的原因,因为会有过多的空气泄漏。已经提出了各种技术来克服这个困难,例如在口罩边缘涂抹凝胶。我们的目的是确定凝胶技术是否会改善通气,并评估提供者的舒适度。采用随机交叉设计评估了胡须模拟模型中凝胶的效果。呼吸治疗师(RT)通过便利抽样招募,使用双手技术持口罩进行两分钟通气。在通气期间,呼吸机提供固定的潮气量(TV)550ml 和呼吸频率为每分钟 12 次,模拟模型测量接收到的容量。我们比较了有凝胶和没有凝胶时的中位 TV 和通气尝试失败次数。使用凝胶时的舒适度水平通过构建问题进行评估。我们招募了在利雅得市工作的 74 名呼吸治疗师。超过一半的参与者有超过 5 年的经验。标准口罩通气时不使用凝胶的中位潮气量为 283ml[四分位距(IQR)224,327],而使用凝胶时为 467ml[451,478](p<0.01)。在每种技术的 2 分钟通气期间记录 24 次呼吸中的成功通气次数;使用凝胶时,成功通气的比例显著增加 65%(95%CI 51-75%,p<0.01)。此外,只有 9 名参与者认为该技术不舒服,而其余参与者认为该技术舒适或自然。在我们的胡须模拟模型中,使用凝胶可显著改善通气,而不会对舒适度产生负面影响。鼓励在基础气道管理领域开展进一步的研究和教育。