Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8264-7761 [S.K.L.]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1746-2653 [X.W.]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8512-0735 [J.S.]).
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583.
J Food Prot. 2021 Mar 1;84(3):521-530. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-232.
Different methods for determining the thermal inactivation kinetics of microorganisms can result in discrepancies in thermal resistance values. In this study, thermal resistance of Salmonella in whole milk powder was determined with three methods: thermal death time (TDT) disk in water bath, pouches in water bath, and the TDT Sandwich system. Samples from three production lots of whole milk powder were inoculated with a five-strain Salmonella cocktail and equilibrated to a water activity of 0.20. The samples were then subjected to three isothermal treatments at 75, 80, or 85°C. Samples were removed at six time points and cultures were enumerated for survivors. The inactivation data were fitted to two consolidated models: two primary models (log linear and Weibull) and one secondary model (Bigelow). Normality testing indicated that all the model parameters were normally distributed. None of the model parameters for both consolidated models were significantly different (α = 0.05). The amount of inactivation during the come-up time was also not significantly different among the methods (α = 0.05). However, the TDT Sandwich resulted in less inactivation during the come-up time and overall less variation in model parameters. The survivor data from all three methods were combined and fitted to both consolidated models. The Weibull had a lower root mean square error and a better fit, according to the corrected Akaike's information criterion. The three thermal treatment methods produced results that were not significantly different; thus, the methods are interchangeable, at least for Salmonella in whole milk powder. Comparisons with more methods, other microorganisms, and larger varieties of food products using the same framework presented in this study could provide guidance for standardizing thermal inactivation kinetics studies for microorganisms in foods.
不同的方法来确定微生物的热失活动力学可能会导致热抗性值的差异。在本研究中,采用三种方法来确定全脂奶粉中沙门氏菌的热抗性:水浴中的热死亡时间(TDT)盘、水浴袋和 TDT 三明治系统。从三个全脂奶粉生产批次中取样本,接种五株沙门氏菌鸡尾酒,并将其水活度平衡至 0.20。然后将样本置于 75、80 或 85°C 的三个等温处理中。在六个时间点取出样本,并对存活菌进行培养计数。将失活动力学数据拟合到两个综合模型:两个主要模型(对数线性和 Weibull)和一个次要模型(Bigelow)。正态性检验表明,所有模型参数均呈正态分布。两个综合模型的所有模型参数均无显著差异(α=0.05)。在方法之间,上升时间内的失活量也没有显著差异(α=0.05)。然而,TDT 三明治在上升时间内导致的失活量更少,并且模型参数的变化也更小。来自所有三种方法的存活数据被合并并拟合到两个综合模型中。根据校正后的赤池信息量准则,Weibull 具有更低的均方根误差和更好的拟合度。三种热处理方法产生的结果没有显著差异;因此,这些方法是可互换的,至少对于全脂奶粉中的沙门氏菌是如此。使用本研究中提出的相同框架,与更多方法、其他微生物和更大种类的食品进行比较,可以为标准化食品中微生物的热失活动力学研究提供指导。