Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159 Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159 Mannheim, Germany; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 15;225:117510. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117510. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Alterations in the structural connectome of schizophrenia patients have been widely characterized, but the mechanisms remain largely unknown. Generative network models have recently been introduced as a tool to test the biological underpinnings of altered brain network formation. We evaluated different generative network models in healthy controls (n=152), schizophrenia patients (n=66), and their unaffected first-degree relatives (n=32), and we identified spatial and topological factors contributing to network formation. We further investigated how these factors relate to cognition and to polygenic risk for schizophrenia. Our data show that among the four tested classes of generative network models, structural brain networks were optimally accounted for by a two-factor model combining spatial constraints and topological neighborhood structure. The same wiring model explained brain network formation across study groups. However, relatives and schizophrenia patients exhibited significantly lower spatial constraints and lower topological facilitation compared to healthy controls. Further exploratory analyses point to potential associations of the model parameter reflecting spatial constraints with the polygenic risk for schizophrenia and cognitive performance. Our results identify spatial constraints and local topological structure as two interrelated mechanisms contributing to regular brain network formation as well as altered connectomes in schizophrenia and healthy individuals at familial risk for schizophrenia. On an exploratory level, our data further point to the potential relevance of spatial constraints for the genetic risk for schizophrenia and general cognitive functioning, thereby encouraging future studies in following up on these observations to gain further insights into the biological basis and behavioral relevance of model parameters.
精神分裂症患者的结构连接组已经得到了广泛的研究,但其中的机制仍知之甚少。生成网络模型最近被引入,作为测试大脑网络形成改变的生物学基础的工具。我们在健康对照组(n=152)、精神分裂症患者组(n=66)及其未受影响的一级亲属组(n=32)中评估了不同的生成网络模型,并确定了促成网络形成的空间和拓扑因素。我们进一步研究了这些因素与认知和精神分裂症的多基因风险之间的关系。我们的数据表明,在测试的四类生成网络模型中,结构脑网络由一个结合空间约束和拓扑邻域结构的两因素模型最佳解释。相同的布线模型解释了研究组之间的大脑网络形成。然而,与健康对照组相比,亲属和精神分裂症患者的空间约束和拓扑促进作用明显较低。进一步的探索性分析表明,反映空间约束的模型参数可能与精神分裂症的多基因风险和认知表现有关。我们的结果确定了空间约束和局部拓扑结构作为两种相互关联的机制,它们有助于正常的大脑网络形成以及精神分裂症和有精神分裂症家族风险的健康个体的连接组改变。在探索性水平上,我们的数据进一步表明,空间约束可能与精神分裂症的遗传风险和一般认知功能有关,从而鼓励未来的研究进一步关注这些观察结果,以深入了解模型参数的生物学基础和行为相关性。