• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估老年人健康素养的自我报告工具的测量特性:系统评价。

Measurement properties of self-report instruments to assess health literacy in older adults: a systematic review.

机构信息

Discipline of Nursing, College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(11):2241-2257. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1836044. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2020.1836044
PMID:33164591
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High health literacy (HL) is important to optimise health outcomes, particularly for older people (who are substantial consumers of health services) and their adult caregivers. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate measurement properties of HL instruments tested with these population groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six databases (MEDLINE (OVID); CINAHL; EMBASE (OVID); PsycInfo; Scopus; Cochrane Library) were searched for studies evaluating eight measurement properties of HL tools administered to older people or their caregivers. Only studies evaluating multi-domain self-report HL tools were included in analyses, using the COSMIN methodology.

RESULTS

From 4261 unique papers located, 11 met inclusion criteria; six reported measurement properties of three HL self-report tools administered to older people (HLQ, eHEALS, and HeLMS) so are reported in this review, none involved caregiver samples. The HLQ and HeLMS were rated "moderate," and eHEALS "low" for tool development. The HLQ, examined in four included studies, had the highest ratings and quality of evidence across the three measurement properties investigated in included papers.

CONCLUSION

The HLQ was the most highly rated self-report HL tool of just three tested with older people. Further studies evaluating measurement properties of self-report HL tools used with older people and/or their caregivers are needed.Implications for rehabilitationHealth literacy is important to optimise health outcomes of interventions for older people and their adult caregivers.Few studies have evaluated measurement properties of self-report / multi-domain health literacy tools for this population.The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) had the highest ratings and quality of evidence across the three measurement properties investigated in included studies, and is recommended for use in rehabilitation settings.

摘要

背景

较高的健康素养(HL)对于优化健康结果至关重要,尤其是对于老年人(他们是医疗服务的主要消费者)及其成年照顾者而言。本系统评价的目的是评估针对这些人群进行测试的 HL 工具的测量特性。

材料与方法

在六个数据库(MEDLINE(OVID);CINAHL;EMBASE(OVID);PsycInfo;Scopus;Cochrane Library)中检索了评估在老年人或其照顾者中使用的 HL 工具的八项测量特性的研究。仅包括使用 COSMIN 方法评估多领域自我报告 HL 工具的研究。

结果

从 4261 篇独特的论文中,有 11 篇符合纳入标准;其中 6 篇报告了针对老年人使用的三种 HL 自我报告工具(HLQ、eHEALS 和 HeLMS)的测量特性,因此在本综述中进行了报告,没有涉及照顾者样本。HLQ 和 HeLMS 的工具开发被评为“中等”,eHEALS 则为“低”。HLQ 在四项纳入研究中进行了评估,在所纳入论文研究的三个测量特性中,其评分和证据质量均最高。

结论

HLQ 是在针对老年人进行测试的三种自我报告 HL 工具中评分最高的。需要进一步研究评估针对老年人及其成年照顾者使用的自我报告 HL 工具的测量特性。

康复的意义

健康素养对于优化老年人及其成年照顾者的干预健康结果非常重要。很少有研究评估针对该人群的自我报告/多领域健康素养工具的测量特性。健康素养问卷(HLQ)在所纳入研究的三个测量特性中具有最高的评分和证据质量,建议在康复环境中使用。

相似文献

1
Measurement properties of self-report instruments to assess health literacy in older adults: a systematic review.评估老年人健康素养的自我报告工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(11):2241-2257. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1836044. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
The application of health literacy measurement tools (collective or individual domains) in assessing chronic disease management: a systematic review protocol.健康素养测量工具(集体或个体领域)在慢性病管理评估中的应用:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 7;5:97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0267-8.
3
Measurement properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) among older adults who present to the emergency department after a fall: a Rasch analysis.在因跌倒而到急诊科就诊的老年人中,健康素养问卷 (HLQ) 的测量特性:一项 Rasch 分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2520-9.
4
Self-administered health literacy instruments for people with diabetes: systematic review of measurement properties.糖尿病患者自我管理健康素养工具:测量特性的系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Sep;73(9):2035-2048. doi: 10.1111/jan.13256. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
5
Measurement Properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire in the Understanding Multiple Sclerosis Massive Open Online Course Cohort: A Rasch Analysis.健康素养问卷在多发性硬化症大规模开放式在线课程队列中的测量特性:Rasch 分析。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jul;6(3):e200-e212. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220720-01. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
6
Towards a comprehensive, person-centred assessment of health literacy: translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric test of the Dutch Health Literacy Questionnaire.迈向全面、以人为本的健康素养评估:荷兰健康素养问卷的翻译、文化调适和心理计量学测试。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):1850. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09963-0.
7
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
8
The Instruments Used to Assess Health Literacy and Pharmacotherapy Literacy of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Patients: A Scoping Review.评估 2 型糖尿病患者健康素养和药物治疗素养的工具:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;9:747807. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.747807. eCollection 2021.
9
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
10
eHealth Literacy Instruments: Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.电子健康素养测评工具:系统评价测量特性
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 15;23(11):e30644. doi: 10.2196/30644.

引用本文的文献

1
The Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire 3 (BREQ-3) Is Reliable and Valid for Assessing Motivational Regulations and Self-Determination in Exercise Among Adults Aged 50 Years or Older: A Methodological Study.《运动问卷3中行为调节的巴西葡萄牙语版本(BREQ-3)在评估50岁及以上成年人运动中的动机调节和自我决定方面是可靠且有效的:一项方法学研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 9;22(1):82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010082.
2
Exploring the barriers to the development of organizational health literacy in health institutions to meet the needs of older patients from multiple perspectives: a mixed-methods study.从多重视角探讨卫生机构组织健康素养发展的障碍,以满足老年患者的需求:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 7;24(1):920. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05530-z.
3
Development and validation of a health literacy scale for family caregivers of older people with chronic illness.慢性病老年人家庭照顾者健康素养量表的编制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 1;23(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02057-x.
4
Assessment Tools for Measuring Health Literacy and Digital Health Literacy in a Hospital Setting: A Scoping Review.医院环境中测量健康素养和数字健康素养的评估工具:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 20;12(1):11. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010011.
5
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
6
Use of the English Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) with Health Science University Students in Nepal: A Validity Testing Study.尼泊尔卫生科学大学生使用英语健康素养问卷(HLQ):一项效度测试研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;19(6):3241. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063241.