Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤患者康复临床实践指南的叙述性回顾:2010-2020 年。

Narrative Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation of People With Spinal Cord Injury: 2010-2020.

机构信息

From the Center for the Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia (LHG, SP); Beatty Center for Study of Liver Disease, Department of Medicine, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia (LHG, RD); American Institutes for Research, Arlington, Virginia (CC); American Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (SG); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LM); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (ALH); and UPMC Rehabilitation Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (ALH).

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May 1;100(5):501-512. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001637.

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines provide reliable, vetted, and critical information to bring research to practice. Some medical specialties (e.g., physical medicine and rehabilitation) provide multidomain treatment for various conditions. This presents challenges because physical medicine and rehabilitation is a small specialty, a diverse patient base in terms sociodemographics and diagnosis, treatments are difficult to standardize, and rehabilitation research is underfunded. We wished to identify quality and applicability of clinical practice guidelines and searched "Spinal Cord Injury AND Clinical Practice Guidelines AND Rehabilitation" and vetting process.Three hundred fifty-nine articles were identified of which 58 met all criteria for full-text review of which 13 were included in the final selection. Additional publications were accessed from a nondatabase search. Five articles addressed postacute care, community treatment. Nine articles had no recorded vetting process but addressed rehabilitation as an outcome and were included separately. Many of the clinical practice guidelines were developed without evidence from randomized controlled trials, one had input from stakeholders, and some are out of date and do not address important aspects of changes in demographics of the affected population and the use of newer technologies such as sensors and robotics and devices. Identification of these gaps may help stimulate treatment that is clinically relevant, accessible, and current.

摘要

临床实践指南提供可靠、经过审查和关键的信息,将研究转化为实践。一些医学专业(例如,物理医学与康复)为各种病症提供多领域的治疗。这带来了挑战,因为物理医学与康复是一个小专业,患者群体在社会人口统计学和诊断方面具有多样性,治疗难以标准化,康复研究资金不足。我们希望确定临床实践指南的质量和适用性,并搜索了“脊髓损伤和临床实践指南和康复”以及审查过程。确定了 359 篇文章,其中 58 篇符合全文审查的所有标准,最终选择了 13 篇。从非数据库搜索中获取了其他出版物。五篇文章涉及急性后期护理、社区治疗。九篇文章没有记录审查过程,但将康复作为结果进行了讨论,并分别收录。许多临床实践指南的制定都没有随机对照试验的证据,其中一个有利益相关者的投入,还有一些已经过时,没有涉及到受影响人群的人口统计学变化以及使用新的技术(如传感器和机器人和设备)等重要方面。识别这些差距可能有助于促进临床相关、可及和最新的治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验