Nanyonga Rose Clarke, Bosire Edna N, Heller David J, Bradley Elizabeth, Reynolds Nancy R
Clarke International University, 3rd Floor, International Hospital Kampala Building, Kampala, Uganda.
South African Medical Research Council Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Nov 1;35(Supplement_1):i51-i64. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa100.
Evidence regarding the role of nurses-in-leadership and how to engage nurses in policy decisions is minimal in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study was: (1) to assess the leadership practices of nurses-in-leadership in Uganda (by self-report) and from the perspective of 'followers' (direct-report, peers, co-workers, other); and (2) to determine factors (positively) associated with leadership practices. We surveyed 480 nurses, 120 in leadership roles (Response Rate 57%) and 360 'followers' (Response Rate 60%), who were recruited from five hospitals in Kampala, Uganda. We used the Leadership Practice Inventory (Self and Observer), a project-specific demographic questionnaire and Denison's Organizational Culture Survey (DOCS). Sixty-three per cent of the respondents held a registered nursing certificate; 79% had received formal leadership training; 47% were based in private for-profit (PFP) hospitals, 28% in private not-for-profit (PNFP) and 25% in public hospitals. Among the five leadership practices, nurses-in-leadership used the practice of Model the Way (M = 8.27, SD = 1.30), Challenge the Process (M = 8.12, SD = 1.30) and Encourage the Heart (M = 8.04, SD = 1.51) more frequently (on a 10-point Likert Scale). Inspire a Shared Vision (M = 7.82, SD = 1.57) and Enable Others to Act (M = 7.62, SD = 1.66) practices were used less frequently. The same rank order was true for leadership scores from the perception of followers. However, leadership scores by followers were significantly lower (P < 0.01) than the nurse leader self-reported scores across all sub-scales. Leadership practice scores were higher in public than private hospitals (P < 0.0001). Organizational culture (OC) was associated (P < 0.001) with leadership practices. Although overall leadership practice scores were generally high, the less frequent use of Inspire and Enable practices suggests opportunities for targeted improvement. Moreover, differences between self-reported and leadership scores by followers suggest perception gaps between leaders and their followers. The positive relationship between public hospital settings and self-reported leadership practices among nurses-in-leadership suggests that important nursing leadership practices are possible even in a low-resource clinical setting.
在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,关于护士领导者的角色以及如何让护士参与政策决策的证据极少。本研究的目的是:(1)从“追随者”(直接下属、同事、其他人员)的角度以及通过自我报告评估乌干达护士领导者的领导行为;(2)确定与领导行为(呈正相关)相关的因素。我们对480名护士进行了调查,其中120名担任领导职务(回复率57%),360名“追随者”(回复率60%),他们来自乌干达坎帕拉的五家医院。我们使用了领导行为量表(自我评估和他人评估)、一份针对该项目的人口统计学问卷以及丹尼森组织文化调查(DOCS)。63%的受访者持有注册护士证书;79%接受过正规的领导力培训;47%就职于私立营利性(PFP)医院,28%就职于私立非营利性(PNFP)医院,25%就职于公立医院。在五种领导行为中,护士领导者更频繁地使用“以身作则”(M = 8.27,标准差 = 1.30)、“挑战现状”(M = 8.12,标准差 = 1.30)和“激励人心”(M = 8.04,标准差 = 1.51)(10分制李克特量表)。“共启愿景”(M = 7.82,标准差 = 1.57)和“使众人行”(M = 7.62,标准差 = 1.66)行为的使用频率较低。从追随者的认知角度来看,领导得分的排名顺序也是如此。然而,在所有子量表中,追随者给出的领导得分显著低于护士领导者的自我报告得分(P < 0.01)。公立医院的领导行为得分高于私立医院(P < 0.0001)。组织文化(OC)与领导行为相关(P < 0.001)。尽管总体领导行为得分普遍较高,但“激励”和“使众人行”行为使用频率较低表明存在有针对性改进的机会。此外,自我报告得分与追随者给出的领导得分之间的差异表明领导者与追随者之间存在认知差距。公立医院环境与护士领导者自我报告的领导行为之间的正相关关系表明,即使在资源匮乏的临床环境中,重要的护理领导行为也是可能的。