• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perceived Benefits and Burdens of Participation for Caregivers of Cancer Patients in Hospice Clinical Trials: A Pilot Study.癌症患者临终关怀临床试验中照顾者的参与感知获益和负担:一项初步研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jun;61(6):1147-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.024. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
Conducting the ACTIVE randomized trial in hospice care: keys to success.在临终关怀中开展 ACTIVE 随机试验:成功的关键。
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):160-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774512461858. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
3
Anxiety, Depression, Quality of Life, Caregiver Burden, and Perceptions of Caregiver-Centered Communication among Black and White Hospice Family Caregivers.黑人和白人临终关怀家庭照顾者的焦虑、抑郁、生活质量、照顾者负担和以照顾者为中心的沟通感知。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):596-605. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0302. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
Impact of an automated, remote monitoring and coaching intervention in reducing hospice cancer family caregiving burden: A multisite randomized controlled trial.自动化远程监测和辅导干预对减轻临终关怀癌症家庭照护负担的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2024 Apr 1;130(7):1171-1182. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35131. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
5
Balancing Work and Hospice Caregiving-A Closer Look at Burden, Preparedness, and Mental Health.平衡工作与临终关怀护理——深入探讨负担、准备情况和心理健康
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Feb;63(2):283-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
6
What contextual factors account for anxiety and depressed mood in hospice family caregivers?哪些情境因素导致了临终关怀家庭护理人员的焦虑和抑郁情绪?
Psychooncology. 2022 Feb;31(2):316-325. doi: 10.1002/pon.5816. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
7
Caregiver Perspectives on the Benefits, Burdens, and Moral Distress of Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.照顾者对参与癌症临床试验的益处、负担及道德困扰的看法。
J Fam Nurs. 2023 Feb;29(1):89-98. doi: 10.1177/10748407221098187. Epub 2022 May 25.
8
Caregiver Speaks Study Protocol: A Technologically-Mediated Storytelling Intervention for Hospice Family Caregivers of Persons Living With Dementia.照顾者讲述研究方案:一项针对痴呆症患者临终关怀家庭照顾者的技术介导叙事干预。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Apr;38(4):376-382. doi: 10.1177/1049909120960449. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer: a randomized clinical trial.应对技能干预对临终关怀癌症患者家庭照顾者的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;106(1):214-22. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21567.
10
Unique characteristics of informal hospice cancer caregiving.临终关怀癌症非正式护理的独特特征。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):2121-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2570-z. Epub 2014 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to publication for results of clinical trials.临床试验结果的发表时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;11(11):MR000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000011.pub3.
2
Addressing Statistical Power and Increasing Diversity in Hospice Research: Electronic Medical Record Participant Identification Compared to Nurse Referral Approaches to Recruitment.解决临终关怀研究中的统计效力和多样性问题:电子病历参与者识别与护士推荐招募方法的比较。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec;68(6):594-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Nursing Support for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.癌症患者的家庭照顾者负担的护理支持:范围综述。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Oct;41(10):1184-1194. doi: 10.1177/10499091231215808. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Is our public research money well spent? Publication of research outputs from Health Research Council of New Zealand-funded studies: a cross-sectional study.我们的公共研究资金是否得到了有效利用?对新西兰健康研究理事会资助研究的产出成果的发表情况进行调查:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 31;13(5):e072446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072446.
5
Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study.澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册试验中的发表偏倚:这是一个问题吗?一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):e0279926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279926. eCollection 2023.
6
Hospice Family Caregiver Perceptions of Benefits and Challenges of a Telenovela Educational Intervention.临终关怀家庭护理员对电视剧教育干预的益处和挑战的看法。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;25(6):945-951. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0628. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in Implementing Hospice Clinical Trials: Preserving Scientific Integrity While Facing Change.实施临终关怀临床试验的挑战:在面临变革时保持科学诚信。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Feb;59(2):365-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.028. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
2
Brief psychosocial interventions improve quality of life of patients receiving palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.简短的社会心理干预可改善接受姑息治疗患者的生活质量:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;33(3):332-345. doi: 10.1177/0269216318818011. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
The Prevalence and Risks for Depression and Anxiety in Hospice Caregivers.临终关怀护理人员中抑郁和焦虑的患病率及风险
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):366-371. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0372. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
Developing a Model of the Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.建立癌症临床试验中研究参与的益处与负担模型。
AJOB Prim Res. 2012;3(2):10-23. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2011.653472.
5
Anxiety among informal hospice caregivers: an exploratory study.临终关怀非正式照护者的焦虑情绪:一项探索性研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):567-73. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513001193. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
6
Hospice caregiver depression: the evidence surrounding the greatest pain of all.临终关怀护理人员的抑郁:围绕这一最大痛苦的证据。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2013;9(4):256-71. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2013.846891.
7
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
8
Informed consent in palliative care clinical trials: challenging but possible.在姑息治疗临床试验中获得知情同意:具有挑战性但并非不可能。
J Palliat Med. 2013 May;16(5):485-91. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0422. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
9
Designing research with hospice and palliative care populations.针对临终关怀和姑息治疗人群开展研究设计。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012 Aug;29(5):335-45. doi: 10.1177/1049909111427139. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
10
Research in end-of-life settings: an ethical inquiry.临终环境中的研究:一项伦理探究。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010 Sep;24(3):244-50. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.493579.

癌症患者临终关怀临床试验中照顾者的参与感知获益和负担:一项初步研究。

Perceived Benefits and Burdens of Participation for Caregivers of Cancer Patients in Hospice Clinical Trials: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Division of Palliative Medicine, Barnes Jewish College, Goldfarb School of Nursing, Washington University St Louis, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jun;61(6):1147-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.024. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.024
PMID:33166583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8552226/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Hospice is a service for those with a life expectancy of six months or less. Family caregivers suffer from depression and anxiety as they care for their loved one until they die. Little is known about how research participants decide to consent to participate in clinical trials in the hospice setting.

OBJECTIVES

This pilot study sought to answer two research questions: 1) In what way do demographic characteristics, mental health, and perceived caregiving experience impact the decision by caregivers to participate in hospice clinical trials? 2) In what ways do the perceived physical, psychological, economic, familial, and social dimensions of caregivers' lives influence their decision to participate in hospice clinical trials?

METHODS

The characteristics and stated reasons for consent of hospice caregivers participating in a clinical trial were compared with individuals who refused clinical trial consent and only consented to this pilot study. Demographic, mental health, and perceptions of caregiving experience were measured as influencers to the consent decision. Recruitment calls were recorded and coded using framework analysis to identify perceived benefits and burdens impacting the decision to consent to the clinical trial.

RESULTS

Overall, trial participants were more often adult children to the patient (55% vs. 21%, P = 0.005), younger (56 vs. 63 years, P = 0.04), and employed (47% vs. 24%, P = 0.02) as compared with those who did not consent to participate in the trial. Reported levels of depression, anxiety, and quality of life were not significantly different between those who chose to participate in the clinical trial and those who participated only in this pilot study; however, caregiver burden was higher for those consenting to the clinical trial (4.05 vs. 7.16, P < 0.0001). Perceived benefits expressed by both groups were largely psychological as participants felt positive about contributing to science. Burdens expressed by both groups were predominately physical as they related to hesitation to participate in the intervention because of technology or the burdens of caregiving.

CONCLUSION

The benefits and burdens model for clinical trial participation is applicable to the caregiver experience in the hospice setting. Understanding the perceptions and dimensions of benefits and burdens to potential study participants is critical to not only the intervention design but also the tailoring of recruitment contacts and informed consent process.

摘要

背景

临终关怀是为预期寿命不足六个月的人提供的服务。在照顾亲人直至亲人去世的过程中,家庭护理人员会遭受抑郁和焦虑。对于研究参与者如何决定同意参与临终关怀环境中的临床试验,人们知之甚少。

目的

本试点研究旨在回答两个研究问题:1)人口统计学特征、心理健康和感知的护理经验如何影响护理人员参与临终关怀临床试验的决定?2)护理人员生活的身体、心理、经济、家庭和社会方面的感知如何影响他们参与临终关怀临床试验的决定?

方法

将参与临床试验的临终关怀护理人员的特征和同意理由与拒绝临床试验同意但仅同意参与本试点研究的人员进行比较。人口统计学、心理健康和护理经验感知被测量为同意决定的影响因素。招募电话使用框架分析进行记录和编码,以确定影响同意参加临床试验的感知益处和负担。

结果

总体而言,试验参与者更可能是患者的成年子女(55%比 21%,P=0.005),年龄较小(56 岁比 63 岁,P=0.04),并且就业(47%比 24%,P=0.02)与那些不同意参加试验的人相比。选择参加临床试验和仅参加本试点研究的人之间的抑郁、焦虑和生活质量报告水平没有显著差异;然而,同意参加临床试验的护理人员的护理人员负担更高(4.05 比 7.16,P<0.0001)。两组表达的感知益处主要是心理上的,因为参与者对为科学做出贡献感到积极。两组表达的负担主要是身体上的,因为他们因为技术或护理负担而对参与干预犹豫不决。

结论

临床试验参与的益处和负担模型适用于临终关怀环境中的护理人员体验。了解潜在研究参与者的感知和益处及负担维度对于干预设计以及招募联系和知情同意过程的定制至关重要。