Center for Bioelectric Interfaces Higher School of Economics Moscow, Moscow, 101000, Russia.
J Neural Eng. 2020 Dec 16;17(6). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/abc8d7.
Feedback latency was shown to be a critical parameter in a range of applications that imply learning. The therapeutic effects of neurofeedback (NFB) remain controversial. We hypothesized that often encountered unreliable results of NFB intervention could be associated with large feedback latency values that are often uncontrolled and may preclude the efficient learning.We engaged our subjects into a parietal alpha power unpregulating paradigm facilitated by visual NFB based on the individually extracted envelope of the alpha-rhythm at P4 electrode. NFB was displayed either as soon as electroencephalographic (EEG) envelope was processed, or with an extra 250 or 500 ms delay. The feedback training consisted of 15 two-minute long blocks interleaved with 15 s pauses. We have also recorded 2 min long baselines immediately before and after the training.The time course of NFB-induced changes in the alpha rhythm power clearly depended on NFB latency, as shown with the adaptive Neyman test. NFB had a strong effect on the alpha-spindle incidence rate, but not on their duration or amplitude. The sustained changes in alpha activity measured after the completion of NFB training were negatively correlated to latency, with the maximum change for the shortest tested latency and no change for the longest.Here we for the first time show that visual NFB of parietal EEG alpha-activity is efficient only when delivered to human subjects at short latency, which guarantees that NFB arrives when an alpha spindle is still ongoing. Such a considerable effect of NFB latency on the alpha-activity temporal structure could explain some of the previous inconsistent results, where latency was neither controlled nor documented. Clinical practitioners and manufacturers of NFB equipment should add latency to their specifications while enabling latency monitoring and supporting short-latency operations.
反馈时滞在一系列需要学习的应用中被证明是一个关键参数。神经反馈(NFB)的治疗效果仍然存在争议。我们假设,NFB 干预中经常遇到的不可靠结果可能与通常不受控制的大反馈时滞值有关,而这些值可能会妨碍有效的学习。
我们让研究对象参与到一个顶叶 alpha 功率无调节范式中,该范式由基于 P4 电极提取的 alpha 节律个体包络的视觉 NFB 来促进。NFB 要么在 EEG 包络处理后立即显示,要么延迟 250 或 500 ms。反馈训练由 15 个两分钟长的块组成,每个块之间插入 15 秒的暂停。我们还在训练前后立即记录了 2 分钟长的基线。
NFB 诱导的 alpha 节律功率变化的时间进程显然取决于 NFB 时滞,这可以通过自适应 Neyman 检验来证明。NFB 对 alpha 纺锤波发生率有很强的影响,但对其持续时间或幅度没有影响。在 NFB 训练完成后测量的 alpha 活动的持续变化与潜伏期呈负相关,最短测试潜伏期的变化最大,最长潜伏期的变化为零。
这里我们首次表明,只有当视觉顶叶 EEG alpha 活动的 NFB 以短潜伏期传递给人体时,它才是有效的,这保证了 NFB 在 alpha 纺锤波仍在进行时到达。NFB 潜伏期对 alpha 活动时间结构的这种显著影响可以解释以前一些不一致结果的原因,这些结果中潜伏期既没有得到控制,也没有记录。NFB 设备的临床医生和制造商应该在他们的规格中加入潜伏期,同时实现潜伏期监测并支持短潜伏期操作。