Suppr超能文献

草药治疗流感:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Herbal Medicine Treatment for Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung-Hee University, Kyung-Hee Dae-ro 26, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine, Kyung-Hee University Korean Medical Hospital, Kyung-Hee University Medical Center, Kyung-Hee Dae-ro 23, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Am J Chin Med. 2020;48(7):1553-1576. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X20500779. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

Abstract

The aim of this research is to evaluate the clinical evidence of an herbal medicine (HM) treatment on influenza and describe the potential benefits and adverse events by reviewing all relevant randomized controlled trials. All papers published from 2010 to 2019 in all languages in six databases were searched, including all randomized controlled trials on adults and children, testing herbal medicine for treatment of influenza, alone or in combination with conventional antiviral therapy. The main outcome parameters of interest were total effective rate, time to resolution of fever, adverse events, complications, and duration of viral shedding. 25 trials of 3044 patients were included. Herbal medicine compared to placebo significantly reduced time to fever resolution by 4.96[Formula: see text]h (mean difference, [Formula: see text]4.96; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]7.11 to [Formula: see text]2.80; [Formula: see text]), herbal medicine compared to oseltamivir showed no significant difference (mean difference, [Formula: see text]1.82; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]6.08 to 2.44; [Formula: see text]), and herbal medicine plus oseltamivir combined treatment significantly reduced duration of fever by 7.84[Formula: see text]h compared to a single treatment with oseltamivir (mean difference, [Formula: see text]7.84; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]12.51 to [Formula: see text]3.17; [Formula: see text]). Herbal medicine compared to placebo showed a significantly better total effective rate (risk ratio, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.18 to 3.07; [Formula: see text]), herbal medicine compared to oseltamivir indicated significantly better effective rate (risk ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.29; [Formula: see text]), and combined treatment showed a significantly better total effective rate compared to a single treatment with oseltamivir (risk ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.36; [Formula: see text]). Regarding safety, no serious adverse events were reported in HM treatment. HM presented fewer adverse events compared to oseltamivir, but the difference was not significant (risk difference, [Formula: see text]0.04; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]0.09 to 0.00; [Formula: see text]), and the combined treatment did not increase adverse events compared to oseltamivir (risk difference, [Formula: see text]0.02; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]0.06 to 0.02; [Formula: see text]). Research findings show that herbal medicine treatments have beneficial therapeutic effects on influenza and could decrease duration of fever and improve total effective rate. In addition, herbal medicine plus oseltamivir combined therapy could increase the therapeutic effect compared to a single treatment with oseltamivir.

摘要

本研究旨在评估一种草药(HM)治疗流感的临床证据,并通过回顾所有相关的随机对照试验来描述其潜在的益处和不良事件。在六个数据库中以所有语言检索了 2010 年至 2019 年发表的所有论文,包括所有针对成人和儿童的单独使用或联合使用常规抗病毒疗法治疗流感的随机对照试验。主要观察指标为总有效率、退热时间、不良事件、并发症和病毒脱落时间。共纳入 25 项 3044 例患者的试验。与安慰剂相比,HM 可显著缩短退热时间 4.96[Formula: see text]h(平均差,[Formula: see text]4.96;95%CI,[Formula: see text]7.11 至 [Formula: see text]2.80;[Formula: see text]),与奥司他韦相比,HM 无显著差异(平均差,[Formula: see text]1.82;95%CI,[Formula: see text]6.08 至 2.44;[Formula: see text]),而与奥司他韦联合治疗相比,HM 联合治疗可显著缩短发热时间 7.84[Formula: see text]h,与单独使用奥司他韦相比(平均差,[Formula: see text]7.84;95%CI,[Formula: see text]12.51 至 [Formula: see text]3.17;[Formula: see text])。与安慰剂相比,HM 显示出显著更高的总有效率(风险比,1.90;95%CI,[Formula: see text]1.18 至 3.07;[Formula: see text]),与奥司他韦相比,HM 显示出显著更高的有效率(风险比,1.15;95%CI,[Formula: see text]1.03 至 1.29;[Formula: see text]),与奥司他韦单药治疗相比,联合治疗显示出显著更高的总有效率(风险比,1.20;95%CI,[Formula: see text]1.06 至 1.36;[Formula: see text])。关于安全性,HM 治疗未报告严重不良事件。与奥司他韦相比,HM 组发生的不良事件较少,但差异无统计学意义(风险差异,[Formula: see text]0.04;95%CI,[Formula: see text]0.09 至 0.00;[Formula: see text]),与奥司他韦联合治疗相比,不良事件未增加(风险差异,[Formula: see text]0.02;95%CI,[Formula: see text]0.06 至 0.02;[Formula: see text])。研究结果表明,草药治疗对流感具有有益的治疗作用,可以缩短发热时间,提高总有效率。此外,与奥司他韦单药治疗相比,奥司他韦联合 HM 联合治疗可提高治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验