Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Aug 16;155(4):217-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-4-201108160-00005.
Observational studies from Asia suggest that maxingshigan-yinqiaosan may be effective in the treatment of acute H1N1 influenza.
To compare the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir and maxingshigan-yinqiaosan in treating uncomplicated H1N1 influenza.
Prospective, nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00935194)
Eleven hospitals from 4 provinces in China.
410 persons [corrected] aged 15 to 69 [corrected] years with laboratory-confirmed H1N1 influenza.
Oseltamivir, 75 mg twice daily; maxingshigan-yinqiaosan decoction (composed of 12 Chinese herbal medicines, including honey-fried Herba Ephedrae), 200 mL 4 times daily; oseltamivir plus maxingshigan-yinqiaosan; or no intervention (control). Interventions and control were given for 5 days.
Primary outcome was time to fever resolution. Secondary outcomes included symptom scores and viral shedding determined by using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
Significant reductions in the estimated median time to fever resolution compared with the control group (26.0 hours [95% CI, 24.0 to 33.0 hours]) were seen with oseltamivir (34% [95% CI, 20% to 46%]; P < 0.001), maxingshigan-yinqiaosan (37% [CI, 23% to 49%]; P < 0.001), and oseltamivir plus maxingshigan-yinqiaosan (47% [CI, 35% to 56%]; P < 0.001). Time to fever resolution was reduced by 19% (CI, 0.3% to 34%; P = 0.05) with oseltamivir plus maxingshigan-yinqiaosan compared with oseltamivir. The interventions and control did not differ in terms of decrease in symptom scores (P = 0.38). Two patients who received maxingshigan-yinqiaosan reported nausea and vomiting.
Participants were young and had mild H1N1 influenza virus infection. Missing viral data precluded definitive conclusions about viral shedding.
Oseltamivir and maxingshigan-yinqiaosan, alone and in combination, reduced time to fever resolution in patients with H1N1 influenza virus infection. These data suggest that maxingshigan-yinqiaosan may be used as an alternative treatment of H1N1 influenza virus infection.
Beijing Science and Technology Project and Beijing Nova Program.
亚洲的观察性研究表明,麻杏石甘汤可能对治疗甲型 H1N1 流感有效。
比较奥司他韦和麻杏石甘汤治疗单纯性 H1N1 流感的疗效和安全性。
前瞻性、非盲、随机、对照试验。(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT00935194)
中国 4 个省的 11 家医院。
410 名年龄在 15 至 69 岁之间的实验室确诊的甲型 H1N1 流感患者。
奥司他韦,每日两次 75 mg;麻杏石甘汤(由 12 种中草药组成,包括蜜炙麻黄),每日 4 次 200 mL;奥司他韦加麻杏石甘汤;或不干预(对照组)。干预和对照组均治疗 5 天。
主要结局是发热缓解时间。次要结局包括采用实时逆转录聚合酶链反应确定的症状评分和病毒脱落。
与对照组(26.0 小时 [95%CI,24.0 至 33.0 小时])相比,奥司他韦(34% [95%CI,20%至 46%];P < 0.001)、麻杏石甘汤(37% [CI,23%至 49%];P < 0.001)和奥司他韦加麻杏石甘汤(47% [CI,35%至 56%];P < 0.001)可显著缩短发热缓解时间。奥司他韦加麻杏石甘汤与奥司他韦相比,发热缓解时间缩短 19%(CI,0.3%至 34%;P = 0.05)。在症状评分下降方面,干预组与对照组之间没有差异(P = 0.38)。接受麻杏石甘汤的 2 名患者报告有恶心和呕吐。
参与者年龄较轻,患有轻度甲型 H1N1 流感病毒感染。缺少病毒数据,无法确定病毒脱落的明确结论。
奥司他韦和麻杏石甘汤单独和联合使用均可缩短甲型 H1N1 流感病毒感染患者的发热缓解时间。这些数据表明,麻杏石甘汤可作为甲型 H1N1 流感病毒感染的替代治疗方法。
北京市科技计划和北京市新星计划。