Suppr超能文献

中药治疗甲型 H1N1 流感:随机对照试验的系统评价。

Chinese herbal medicines for the treatment of type A H1N1 influenza: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Centre For Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028093. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chinese herbs are thought to be effective for type A H1N1 influenza. Series of Chinese herbs have been authorized recommended by the Chinese government, and until now a number of clinical trials of Chinese herbs for H1N1 influenza have been conducted. However, there is no critically appraised evidence such as systematic reviews or meta-analyses on potential benefits and harms of medicinal herbs for H1N1 influenza to justify their clinical use and their recommendation.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, VIP, China Important Conference Papers Database, China Dissertation Database, and online clinical trial registry websites were searched for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Chinese herbs for H1N1 influenza till 31 August, 2011. A total of 26 RCTs were identified and reviewed. Most of the RCTs were of high risk of bias with flawed study design and poor methodological quality. The combination of several Chinese herbal medicines with or without oseltamivir demonstrated positive effect on fever resolution, relief of symptoms, and global effectiveness rate compared to oseltamivir alone. However, only one herbal medicine showed positive effect on viral shedding. Most of the trials did not report adverse events, and the safety of herbal medicines is still uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Some Chinese herbal medicines demonstrated potential positive effect for 2009 type A H1N1 influenza; however, due to the lack of placebo controlled trial and lack of repeated test of the intervention, we could not draw confirmative conclusions on the beneficial effect of Chinese herbs for H1N1 influenza. More rigorous trials are warranted to support their clinical use.

摘要

背景

中药被认为对甲型 H1N1 流感有效。中国政府已授权推荐了一系列中草药,迄今为止,已经进行了许多针对甲型 H1N1 流感的中草药临床试验。然而,对于中草药治疗甲型 H1N1 流感的潜在益处和危害,目前尚无系统评价或荟萃分析等关键性评估证据,无法证明其临床应用和推荐的合理性。

方法和发现

截至 2011 年 8 月 31 日,我们在 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CBM、CNKI、VIP、中国重要会议论文数据库、中国学位论文数据库以及在线临床试验注册网站上搜索了已发表和未发表的关于中草药治疗甲型 H1N1 流感的随机对照试验(RCT)。共确定并审查了 26 项 RCT。大多数 RCT 存在较高的偏倚风险,研究设计存在缺陷,方法学质量较差。与单独使用奥司他韦相比,几种中草药的联合使用或不联合奥司他韦在退热、缓解症状和总体有效率方面显示出积极的效果。然而,只有一种草药在病毒脱落方面显示出积极的效果。大多数试验未报告不良反应,中草药的安全性仍不确定。

结论

一些中草药对 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感显示出潜在的积极效果;然而,由于缺乏安慰剂对照试验和干预措施的重复测试,我们无法对中草药治疗甲型 H1N1 流感的有益效果得出确定的结论。需要进行更严格的试验来支持其临床应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e8a/3229517/d711a47aa4d4/pone.0028093.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验