• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从研究到实践:将一种实验性家庭治疗模式应用于常规心理健康护理。

From research to practice: Implementing an experimental home treatment model into routine mental health care.

作者信息

Stulz N, Kawohl W, Jäger M, Mötteli S, Schnyder U, Hepp U

机构信息

Integrated Psychiatric Services Winterthur-Zurcher Unterland, P.O. Box 144, CH-8408Winterthur, Switzerland.

Psychiatric Services Aargau, P.O. Box 432, CH-5201Brugg, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 13;63(1):e94. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.91.

DOI:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.91
PMID:33168129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7681154/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In line with previous findings, in a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), we found that home treatment (HT) for acute mental health care can reduce (substitute) hospital use among severely ill patients in crises. This study examined whether the findings of the RCT generalize to HT services provided under routine care conditions.

METHODS

We compared patients who received HT during the RCT study phase with patients who received the same HT service after it had become part of routine mental health services in the same catchment area. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as service use (HT and hospital bed days) were compared between the RCT and the subsequent routine care study period.

RESULTS

Compared to patients who received HT during the RCT, routine care HT patients were more often living with others, less often admitted compulsorily, more often diagnosed with anxiety and stress-related disorders (ICD-10 F4) and less often diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (F2). When compared to patients who were exclusively treated on hospital wards, involvement of the HT team in patients' care was associated with a clear-cut reduction of hospital bed days both during the RCT and under routine care conditions. However, unlike during the RCT study period, involvement of HT was associated with longer overall treatment episodes (inpatient + HT days) under routine care conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

HT seems to reduce the use of hospital bed days even under routine care conditions but is at risk of producing longer overall acute treatment episodes.

摘要

背景

与之前的研究结果一致,在最近一项随机对照试验(RCT)中,我们发现急性精神卫生保健的居家治疗(HT)可减少(替代)处于危机中的重症患者的住院次数。本研究探讨了RCT的研究结果是否适用于常规护理条件下提供的HT服务。

方法

我们将在RCT研究阶段接受HT的患者与在同一集水区该HT服务成为常规精神卫生服务一部分后接受相同HT服务的患者进行了比较。比较了RCT阶段与后续常规护理研究阶段患者的社会人口学和临床特征以及服务使用情况(HT和住院天数)。

结果

与在RCT期间接受HT的患者相比,常规护理HT患者更常与他人同住,强制入院的情况较少,更常被诊断为焦虑和应激相关障碍(国际疾病分类第十版F4),而被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍(F2)的情况较少。与仅在医院病房接受治疗的患者相比,HT团队参与患者护理在RCT期间和常规护理条件下均与住院天数的明显减少相关。然而,与RCT研究阶段不同,在常规护理条件下,HT的参与与更长的总体治疗疗程(住院+HT天数)相关。

结论

即使在常规护理条件下,HT似乎也能减少住院天数,但存在导致总体急性治疗疗程延长的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f3/7681154/7ddd196f3282/S0924933820000917_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f3/7681154/d9995fbc5133/S0924933820000917_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f3/7681154/7ddd196f3282/S0924933820000917_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f3/7681154/d9995fbc5133/S0924933820000917_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f3/7681154/7ddd196f3282/S0924933820000917_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
From research to practice: Implementing an experimental home treatment model into routine mental health care.从研究到实践:将一种实验性家庭治疗模式应用于常规心理健康护理。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 13;63(1):e94. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.91.
2
Service users' experiences with help and support from crisis resolution teams. A literature review.服务使用者对危机解决小组的帮助和支持的体验。文献综述。
J Ment Health. 2010 Feb;19(1):75-87. doi: 10.3109/09638230903469178.
3
Home treatment for acute mental healthcare: randomised controlled trial.家庭治疗急性精神卫生保健:随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;216(6):323-330. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.31.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial evaluating home treatment with peer support for acute mental health crises (HoPe).一项评价同伴支持用于急性心理健康危机家庭治疗的随机对照试验研究方案(HoPe)。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04247-w.
6
Home Treatment for Acute Mental Healthcare: Who Benefits Most?家庭治疗在急性精神卫生保健中的作用:谁最受益?
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Jul;57(5):828-835. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00618-3. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
A bespoke smoking cessation service compared with treatment as usual for people with severe mental ill health: the SCIMITAR+ RCT.针对严重精神健康问题患者的定制化戒烟服务与常规治疗相比:SCIMITAR+RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(50):1-116. doi: 10.3310/hta23500.
8
Is Home Treatment for Everyone? Characteristics of Patients Receiving Intensive Mental Health Care at Home.每个人都适合居家治疗吗?接受居家强化精神卫生护理患者的特征。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Feb;58(2):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00814-9. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
Treating mental health crises at home: Patient satisfaction with home nursing care.居家心理健康危机处理:患者对家庭护理服务的满意度。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jun;27(3):246-257. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12573. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Utility of Intensive Home Treatment Compared With Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Admission.与急性精神科住院治疗相比,强化家庭治疗的成本效用
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2512465. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12465.
2
Can a crisis resolution team replace an inpatient ward? Results from a French quasi-experimental study.危机解决小组能否取代住院病房?一项法国准实验研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12396-3.
3
Prescriptive factors for intensive home treatment in acute psychiatry: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Home Treatment for Acute Mental Healthcare: Who Benefits Most?家庭治疗在急性精神卫生保健中的作用:谁最受益?
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Jul;57(5):828-835. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00618-3. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
2
[Implementation and Stakeholders' Experiences with Home Treatment in Germany's Integrative and Flexible Psychiatric Care Models - A Mixed-Methods Study].[德国综合灵活精神科护理模式中居家治疗的实施及利益相关者的经验——一项混合方法研究]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2020 Feb;70(2):65-71. doi: 10.1055/a-0942-2163. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
[Clinical Effectiveness of "FlexiTeam" (Home Treatment and Intensive Outpatient Treatment) - Comparison of a Model Project According to § 64b in Berlin with Inpatient Treatment-as-Usual].
急性精神病学中强化家庭治疗的规定性因素:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Jan 3;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00619-1.
4
Clinical Effects of the 'Crisis Toolbox' (CTB): A Brief, Skills Based, Intervention Delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team.“危机工具箱”(CTB)的临床效果:一项简短的、基于技能的干预措施,由危机解决和家庭治疗小组提供。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Aug;59(6):1172-1180. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01100-6. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
5
Equal access to outreach mental health care? Exploring how the place of residence influences the use of intensive home treatment in a rural catchment area in Germany.平等获得外展心理健康服务的机会?探讨居住地如何影响德国农村服务区密集家庭治疗的使用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y.
6
Flexible and Integrative Psychiatric Care Based on a Global Treatment Budget: Comparing the Implementation in Germany and Poland.基于全球治疗预算的灵活综合精神科护理:德国与波兰实施情况的比较
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 7;12:760276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760276. eCollection 2021.
["灵活团队"(居家治疗与强化门诊治疗)的临床疗效——柏林一项依据§ 64b开展的示范项目与常规住院治疗的比较]
Psychiatr Prax. 2019 Jul;46(5):249-255. doi: 10.1055/a-0881-1124. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
Home treatment for acute mental healthcare: randomised controlled trial.家庭治疗急性精神卫生保健:随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;216(6):323-330. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.31.
5
Utilization and Effectiveness of Home Treatment for People With Acute Severe Mental Illness: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis of 19 Months of Observation.急性重症精神疾病患者居家治疗的利用情况及有效性:一项为期19个月观察的倾向得分匹配分析
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 10;9:495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00495. eCollection 2018.
6
A realist approach to the evaluation of complex mental health interventions.一种针对复杂心理健康干预措施的评价的现实主义方法。
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;213(2):451-453. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.96.
7
Intensive home treatment for patients in acute psychiatric crisis situations: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.急性精神病危机患者的强化家庭治疗:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1632-z.
8
Validity of routine clinical diagnoses in acute psychiatric inpatients.常规临床诊断在急性精神病住院患者中的有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:482-487. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses.针对严重精神疾病患者的危机干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 3;2015(12):CD001087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001087.pub5.
10
Implementation of the Crisis Resolution Team model in adult mental health settings: a systematic review.危机解决团队模式在成人心理健康环境中的实施:一项系统综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 8;15:74. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0441-x.