Huang Dejia, Hua Wei, Fang Quan, Yan Ji, Su Yangang, Liu Bing, Xu Yuanning, Peng Yong
Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):546-554. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13114. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
This study aims to investigate the current status of biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with indications for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in China and the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-pacemaker (P) and CRT-defibrillator (D) implantation on the clinical prognosis of CHF among patients undergoing CRT.
Overall, 798 consecutive patients who had devices implanted (implantable cardioverter defibrillator: 199, CRT-D: 362, and CRT-P: 237) from May 2012 to July 2013 in POSCD-China, a multicentric prospective cohort study, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoint was SCD. In total, 71.3% of patients had non-ischaemic CHF. The mean follow-up time was 27.7 ± 12.0 months, and death occurred in 158 cases, with 35 cases of SCD. CHF was the main cause of death (68.4%), followed by sudden death (22.2%). In the CRT-P group, the SCD rate was 8.0%, which was much higher than that in the CRT-D (3.3%) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2.0%) groups. No significant differences were identified in the all-cause death rate between the CRT-D and CRT-P groups (CRT-D vs. CRT-P, 20.4% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.840).
In China, among CHF patients with indications for primary prevention of SCD who received device implantation, non-ischaemic CHF was the main aetiology, and the most important cause of death was heart failure. No differences in all-cause death were observed between the CRT-D and CRT-P groups, but the CRT-D group had a lower SCD rate than the CRT-P group.
本研究旨在调查中国慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者中双心室起搏器和除颤器植入的现状,这些患者有心脏性猝死(SCD)一级预防的指征,以及心脏再同步治疗(CRT)-起搏器(P)和CRT-除颤器(D)植入对接受CRT治疗的CHF患者临床预后的影响。
总体而言,纳入了798例在2012年5月至2013年7月期间于中国多中心前瞻性队列研究POSCD-China接受器械植入的连续患者(植入式心律转复除颤器:199例,CRT-D:362例,CRT-P:237例)。主要终点为全因死亡,次要终点为SCD。总共71.3%的患者患有非缺血性CHF。平均随访时间为27.7±12.0个月,158例患者死亡,其中35例为SCD。CHF是主要死因(68.4%),其次是猝死(22.2%)。在CRT-P组中,SCD发生率为8.0%,远高于CRT-D组(3.3%)和植入式心律转复除颤器组(2.0%)。CRT-D组和CRT-P组之间的全因死亡率无显著差异(CRT-D组 vs. CRT-P组,20.4% vs. 19.4%,P = 0.840)。
在中国,接受器械植入的有SCD一级预防指征的CHF患者中,非缺血性CHF是主要病因,死亡的最重要原因是心力衰竭。CRT-D组和CRT-P组之间未观察到全因死亡差异,但CRT-D组的SCD发生率低于CRT-P组。