Suppr超能文献

中国慢性心力衰竭患者双心室起搏器及除颤器植入术

Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China.

作者信息

Huang Dejia, Hua Wei, Fang Quan, Yan Ji, Su Yangang, Liu Bing, Xu Yuanning, Peng Yong

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):546-554. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13114. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

Abstract

AIMS

This study aims to investigate the current status of biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with indications for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in China and the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-pacemaker (P) and CRT-defibrillator (D) implantation on the clinical prognosis of CHF among patients undergoing CRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Overall, 798 consecutive patients who had devices implanted (implantable cardioverter defibrillator: 199, CRT-D: 362, and CRT-P: 237) from May 2012 to July 2013 in POSCD-China, a multicentric prospective cohort study, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoint was SCD. In total, 71.3% of patients had non-ischaemic CHF. The mean follow-up time was 27.7 ± 12.0 months, and death occurred in 158 cases, with 35 cases of SCD. CHF was the main cause of death (68.4%), followed by sudden death (22.2%). In the CRT-P group, the SCD rate was 8.0%, which was much higher than that in the CRT-D (3.3%) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2.0%) groups. No significant differences were identified in the all-cause death rate between the CRT-D and CRT-P groups (CRT-D vs. CRT-P, 20.4% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.840).

CONCLUSIONS

In China, among CHF patients with indications for primary prevention of SCD who received device implantation, non-ischaemic CHF was the main aetiology, and the most important cause of death was heart failure. No differences in all-cause death were observed between the CRT-D and CRT-P groups, but the CRT-D group had a lower SCD rate than the CRT-P group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查中国慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者中双心室起搏器和除颤器植入的现状,这些患者有心脏性猝死(SCD)一级预防的指征,以及心脏再同步治疗(CRT)-起搏器(P)和CRT-除颤器(D)植入对接受CRT治疗的CHF患者临床预后的影响。

方法与结果

总体而言,纳入了798例在2012年5月至2013年7月期间于中国多中心前瞻性队列研究POSCD-China接受器械植入的连续患者(植入式心律转复除颤器:199例,CRT-D:362例,CRT-P:237例)。主要终点为全因死亡,次要终点为SCD。总共71.3%的患者患有非缺血性CHF。平均随访时间为27.7±12.0个月,158例患者死亡,其中35例为SCD。CHF是主要死因(68.4%),其次是猝死(22.2%)。在CRT-P组中,SCD发生率为8.0%,远高于CRT-D组(3.3%)和植入式心律转复除颤器组(2.0%)。CRT-D组和CRT-P组之间的全因死亡率无显著差异(CRT-D组 vs. CRT-P组,20.4% vs. 19.4%,P = 0.840)。

结论

在中国,接受器械植入的有SCD一级预防指征的CHF患者中,非缺血性CHF是主要病因,死亡的最重要原因是心力衰竭。CRT-D组和CRT-P组之间未观察到全因死亡差异,但CRT-D组的SCD发生率低于CRT-P组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c971/7835594/076793ae3565/EHF2-8-546-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验