Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Str. 68, 1122 Budapest, Hungary.
Center for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Europace. 2023 Oct 5;25(10). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad289.
This study aimed to investigate the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality, comparing it with CRT with a pacemaker (CRT-P). Additionally, the study sought to identify subgroups, evaluate the time trend in treatment effects, and analyze patient characteristics, considering the changing indications over the past decades.
PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase up to October 2021 were screened for studies comparing CRT-P and CRT-D, focusing on mortality. Altogether 26 observational studies were selected comprising 128 030 CRT patients, including 55 469 with CRT-P and 72 561 with CRT-D device. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator was able to reduce all-cause mortality by almost 20% over CRT-P [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.94; P < 0.01] even in propensity-matched studies (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.80-0.87; P < 0.001) but not in those with non-ischaemic aetiology (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.79-1.15; P = 0.19) or over 75 years (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 0.96-1.21; P = 0.17). When treatment effect on mortality was investigated by the median year of inclusion, there was a difference between studies released before 2015 and those thereafter. Time-trend effects could be also observed in patients' characteristics: CRT-P candidates were getting older and the prevalence of ischaemic aetiology was increasing over time.
The results of this systematic review of observational studies, mostly retrospective with meta-analysis, suggest that patients with CRT-D had a lower risk of mortality compared with CRT-P. However, subgroups could be identified, where CRT-D was not superior such as non-ischaemic and older patients. An improved treatment effect of CRT-D on mortality could be observed between the early and late studies partly related to the changed characteristics of CRT candidates.
本研究旨在比较心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)与心脏再同步治疗起搏器(CRT-P)对死亡率的影响。此外,本研究还旨在确定亚组,评估治疗效果的时间趋势,并分析患者特征,考虑到过去几十年不断变化的适应证。
对截至 2021 年 10 月的 PubMed、CENTRAL 和 Embase 进行筛选,以寻找比较 CRT-P 和 CRT-D 的研究,重点关注死亡率。共纳入 26 项观察性研究,共纳入 128030 例 CRT 患者,其中 55469 例接受 CRT-P 治疗,72561 例接受 CRT-D 治疗。与 CRT-P 相比,心脏再同步治疗除颤器可使全因死亡率降低近 20%[校正风险比(HR):0.85;95%置信区间(CI):0.76-0.94;P<0.01],即使在倾向匹配研究中也是如此(HR:0.83;95%CI:0.80-0.87;P<0.001),但在非缺血性病因亚组中并非如此(HR:0.95;95%CI:0.79-1.15;P=0.19)或在 75 岁以上亚组中也并非如此(HR:1.08;95%CI:0.96-1.21;P=0.17)。当通过纳入研究的中位年份来研究死亡率的治疗效果时,发现 2015 年前发表的研究与此后发表的研究之间存在差异。在患者特征方面也可以观察到时间趋势效应:随着时间的推移,CRT-P 候选者年龄更大,缺血性病因的患病率也在增加。
本系统评价观察性研究的结果(主要为回顾性研究,部分为荟萃分析)表明,与 CRT-P 相比,CRT-D 患者的死亡率风险较低。然而,也可以确定亚组,其中 CRT-D 并不优于非缺血性和老年患者。在早期和晚期研究中观察到 CRT-D 对死亡率的治疗效果改善,这在一定程度上与 CRT 候选者特征的变化有关。