Doctoral Program in Health-Related Sciences, College of Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Department of Health Administration, College of Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Sep;27(9):1029-1038. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0334. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Clinical studies of telemedicine (TM) programs for chronic illness have demonstrated mixed results across settings and populations. With recent uptake in use of digital health modalities, more precise patient classification may improve outcomes, efficiency, and effectiveness. The purpose of the research was to develop a predictive score that measures the influence of patient characteristics on TM interventions. The central hypothesis is that disease type, illness severity, and the social determinants of health influence outcomes, including resource utilization, and can be precisely characterized. The retrospective study evaluated the feasibility of creating a patient "Telemedicine ImPact" (TIP) score derived from a Virginia Medicare and Medicaid claims data set. Claims were randomly selected, stratified by disease type, and matched by illness severity into a TM intervention group ( = 7,782) and a nontelemedicine "usual care" control cohort ( = 7,981). The individual records were then summarized into 15,762 cases with 80% of the cases used to develop, train, and test four predictive models (hospital utilization, readmissions, total utilization, and mortality) using 10-fold cross-validation. Bayesian supervised machine learning achieved reference model performance index area under the curve for receiver operating characteristic (AUC/ROC) ≥0.85. Posterior probabilities for each outcome model were generated on a "hold-back" set of 3,082 cases. Robust parametric statistical methods enabled dimension reduction, model validation, and derivation of a reliable composite scaled score that quantified the overall health risk for each case. The TM intervention cohort demonstrated higher total utilization (representing the sum of inpatient, outpatient, and prescription use) and lower mean inpatient utilization than the usual standard of care. This finding suggests TM-based care may shift the composition of health resource utilization, reducing hospitalizations while increasing outpatient services, adjusted for patient differences. : The creation of a patient score using machine learning to predict the effect of TM on outcomes is feasible. Adoption of the TIP score may reduce variability in results by more precisely accounting for the effects of patient characteristics on health outcomes and utilization. More consistent outcome prediction may lead to greater support for digital health.
远程医疗(TM)项目在慢性病方面的临床研究结果因环境和人群而异。随着数字健康模式的广泛应用,更精确的患者分类可能会改善结果、效率和效果。本研究旨在开发一种预测评分,以衡量患者特征对 TM 干预的影响。中心假设是疾病类型、疾病严重程度和健康的社会决定因素会影响结果,包括资源利用,并可以进行精确描述。这项回顾性研究评估了从弗吉尼亚州医疗保险和医疗补助索赔数据集中创建患者“远程医疗影响”(TIP)评分的可行性。索赔被随机选择,按疾病类型分层,并按疾病严重程度与 TM 干预组(n=7782)和非远程医疗“常规护理”对照组(n=7981)相匹配。然后将个体记录汇总为 15762 例,其中 80%的病例用于开发、培训和测试四个预测模型(住院利用、再入院、总利用和死亡率),使用 10 倍交叉验证。贝叶斯监督机器学习实现了参考模型性能指标接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC/ROC)≥0.85。在 3082 例保留病例上生成了每个结果模型的后验概率。稳健的参数统计方法实现了降维、模型验证和生成可靠的综合比例评分,该评分量化了每个病例的总体健康风险。TM 干预组的总利用率(代表住院、门诊和处方使用的总和)高于常规护理标准,平均住院利用率较低。这一发现表明,基于 TM 的护理可能会改变卫生资源利用的构成,在调整患者差异的情况下,减少住院治疗,同时增加门诊服务。使用机器学习为预测 TM 对结果的影响创建患者评分是可行的。采用 TIP 评分可以通过更精确地考虑患者特征对健康结果和利用的影响,减少结果的变异性。更一致的结果预测可能会为数字健康提供更大的支持。