预印本服务器的政策、提交要求以及报告和研究诚信建议的透明度。
Preprint Servers' Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations.
机构信息
Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
出版信息
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1901-1903. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17195.
Abstract
This study describes the policies, submission requirements, and transparency in reporting and research integrity recommendations of academic preprint servers.
摘要
本研究描述了学术预印本服务器的政策、提交要求、报告透明度和研究诚信建议。
相似文献
1
Preprint Servers' Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations.预印本服务器的政策、提交要求以及报告和研究诚信建议的透明度。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1901-1903. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17195.
2
Preprint Servers in Kidney Disease Research: A Rapid Review.肾脏病研究中的预印本服务器：快速综述。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):479-486. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03800320. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
3
Submissions and Downloads of Preprints in the First Year of medRxiv.预印本在 medRxiv 上线首年的提交和下载情况。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1903-1905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17529.
4
Policies of biomedical preprint servers on conflicts of interest, authorship, and research integrity lacked important details.生物医学预印本服务器在利益冲突、作者身份和研究诚信方面的政策缺乏重要细节。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;146:47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
5
Preprint manuscripts and servers in the era of coronavirus disease 2019.2019 冠状病毒病时代的预印本手稿和服务器。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;27(1):16-21. doi: 10.1111/jep.13498. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
6
Preprints and Cardiovascular Science: Prescient or Premature?预印本与心血管科学：有先见之明还是为时过早？
Circulation. 2017 Sep 26;136(13):1177-1179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031238. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
7
Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process.预印本服务器的兴起：预印本服务器如何改变出版流程。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2020 Jan-Mar;39(1):84-89. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1704597.
8
Peer Review Matters.同行评审很重要。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):16-17. doi: 10.1177/1203475420987968.
9
Examining linguistic shifts between preprints and publications.考察预印本和出版物之间的语言变化。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Feb 1;20(2):e3001470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001470. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Preprint review should form part of PhD programmes and postdoc training.预印本评审应成为博士项目和博士后培训的一部分。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7944):415. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00085-2.
引用本文的文献
1
Long-term cancer risk in historic cohorts of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者历史队列中的长期癌症风险：一项系统评价
Spine Deform. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01176-y.
2
The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence.同行评审的现状与未来：理念、干预措施及证据
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 4;122(5):e2401232121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401232121. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Grand challenge in biosafety and biosecurity.生物安全与生物安保领域的重大挑战。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 7;12:1538723. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1538723. eCollection 2024.
4
An international, cross-sectional survey of preprint attitudes among biomedical researchers.一项针对生物医学研究人员预印本态度的国际、横断面调查。
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 4;13:6. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.143013.2. eCollection 2024.
5
Characterization and Reach of Orthopaedic Research Posted to Preprint Servers: Are We "Undercooking" Our Science?骨科研究论文发布到预印本服务器的特征和影响：我们的研究是否“火候不足”？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Aug 1;481(8):1491-1500. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002621. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
6
Peer Review in a General Medical Research Journal Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情前后全科医学研究期刊的同行评审
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2253296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53296.
7
Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report.减少撤回科学文献的意外传播：RISRS报告的建议
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022 Sep 19;7(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00125-x.
8
Publishing Identifiable Patient Photographs in Scientific Journals: Scoping Review of Policies and Practices.在科学期刊中发表可识别患者照片：政策和实践的范围审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 31;24(8):e37594. doi: 10.2196/37594.
9
Biosecurity in an age of open science.开放科学时代的生物安保。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Apr 14;20(4):e3001600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001600. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review-A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists.开放数据、预印本和同行评审的态度和实践-对克罗地亚科学家的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 21;16(6):e0244529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244529. eCollection 2021.
本文引用的文献
1
Journals' instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines.期刊作者须知：跨越科学学科的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 5;14(9):e0222157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222157. eCollection 2019.
2
Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries.针对高收入国家研究不端行为的政策和举措。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
Zotero 插件