Evidence-Based Practice Center, RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1884-1895. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11119.
Childhood hypertension can result in adverse outcomes during adulthood; identifying and treating primary and secondary childhood hypertension may reduce such risks.
To update the evidence on screening and treatment of hypertension in childhood and adolescence for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
PubMed, Cochrane Library, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, EMBASE, and trial registries through September 3, 2019; bibliographies from retrieved articles, experts, and surveillance of the literature through October 6, 2020.
Fair- or good-quality English-language studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy of blood pressure screening; cohort studies assessing the association of hypertension in childhood and adolescence with blood pressure or other intermediate outcomes in adulthood; randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses of pharmacological and lifestyle interventions.
Two reviewers independently assessed titles/abstracts and full-text articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality; the evidence was synthesized qualitatively.
Sensitivity, specificity, and measures of association between childhood and adulthood blood pressure; reduction of childhood blood pressure; adverse effects of treatments.
Forty-two studies from 43 publications were included (N>12 400). No studies evaluated the benefits or harms of screening and the effect of treating childhood hypertension on outcomes in adulthood. One study reported a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.70 for 2 office-based blood pressure measurements. Twenty observational studies suggested a significant association between childhood hypertension and abnormal blood pressure in adulthood (odds ratios, 1.1-4.5; risk ratios, 1.45-3.60; hazard ratios, 2.8-3.2). Thirteen placebo-controlled RCTs and 1 meta-analysis assessed reductions in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure from pharmacological treatments. Pooled reductions of SBP were -4.38 mm Hg (95% CI, -7.27 to -2.16) for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and -3.07 mm Hg (95% CI, -4.99 to -1.44) for angiotensin receptor blockers. Candesartan reduced SBP by -6.56 mm Hg (P < .001; n = 240). β-Blockers, calcium channel blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists did not achieve significant reductions over 2 to 4 weeks. SBP was significantly reduced by exercise over 8 months (-4.9 mm Hg, P ≤ .05; n = 69), by dietary approaches to stop hypertension over 3 months (-2.2 mm Hg, P < .01; n = 57), and by a combination of drug treatment and lifestyle interventions over 6 months (-7.6 mm Hg; P < .001; n = 95). Low-salt diet did not achieve reductions of blood pressure.
Observational studies indicate an association between hypertension in childhood and hypertension in adulthood. However, the evidence is inconclusive whether the diagnostic accuracy of blood pressure measurements is adequate for screening asymptomatic children and adolescents in primary care.
儿童期高血压可能导致成年期不良后果;识别和治疗原发性和继发性儿童高血压可能会降低此类风险。
为美国预防服务工作组更新儿童和青少年高血压筛查和治疗的证据。
PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、国际药学文摘、EMBASE 和 9 月 3 日之前的试验注册处;通过 2020 年 10 月 6 日检索文章、专家和文献监测的参考文献。
评估血压筛查的准确性的具有良好或中等质量的英语研究;评估儿童和青少年期高血压与成年期血压或其他中间结果之间关联的队列研究;药物和生活方式干预的随机临床试验(RCT)或荟萃分析。
两名审查员独立评估标题/摘要和全文文章,提取数据并评估研究质量;综合证据质量进行定性分析。
儿童期和成年期血压之间的敏感性、特异性和关联测量值;儿童期血压降低;治疗的不良反应。
从 43 篇出版物中纳入了 42 项研究(N>12400)。没有研究评估筛查的益处或危害,也没有研究评估治疗儿童期高血压对成年期结局的影响。一项研究报告了 2 次就诊时的血压测量的敏感性为 0.82,特异性为 0.70。20 项观察性研究表明,儿童期高血压与成年期血压异常之间存在显著关联(比值比,1.1-4.5;风险比,1.45-3.60;危险比,2.8-3.2)。13 项安慰剂对照 RCT 和 1 项荟萃分析评估了药物治疗对收缩压(SBP)和舒张压的降低效果。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的 SBP 平均降低幅度为-4.38mmHg(95%CI,-7.27 至-2.16),血管紧张素受体阻滞剂为-3.07mmHg(95%CI,-4.99 至-1.44)。坎地沙坦可使 SBP 降低-6.56mmHg(P<0.001;n=240)。β-受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂在 2 至 4 周内未达到显著降低效果。8 个月的运动(-4.9mmHg,P≤0.05;n=69)、3 个月的饮食干预(-2.2mmHg,P<0.01;n=57)和 6 个月的药物治疗和生活方式干预组合(-7.6mmHg;P<0.001;n=95)可显著降低 SBP。低盐饮食未能降低血压。
观察性研究表明儿童期高血压与成年期高血压之间存在关联。然而,血压测量的诊断准确性是否足以筛查初级保健中无症状的儿童和青少年,证据尚不清楚。