Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Saint Eloi Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2342-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06307-9. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most demanding conditions in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Management of analgesia and sedation in ARDS is particularly challenging. An expert panel was convened to produce a "state-of-the-art" article to support clinicians in the optimal management of analgesia/sedation in mechanically ventilated adults with ARDS, including those with COVID-19. Current ICU analgesia/sedation guidelines promote analgesia first and minimization of sedation, wakefulness, delirium prevention and early rehabilitation to facilitate ventilator and ICU liberation. However, these strategies cannot always be applied to patients with ARDS who sometimes require deep sedation and/or paralysis. Patients with severe ARDS may be under-represented in analgesia/sedation studies and currently recommended strategies may not be feasible. With lightened sedation, distress-related symptoms (e.g., pain and discomfort, anxiety, dyspnea) and patient-ventilator asynchrony should be systematically assessed and managed through interprofessional collaboration, prioritizing analgesia and anxiolysis. Adaptation of ventilator settings (e.g., use of a pressure-set mode, spontaneous breathing, sensitive inspiratory trigger) should be systematically considered before additional medications are administered. Managing the mechanical ventilator is of paramount importance to avoid the unnecessary use of deep sedation and/or paralysis. Therefore, applying an "ABCDEF-R" bundle (R = Respiratory-drive-control) may be beneficial in ARDS patients. Further studies are needed, especially regarding the use and long-term effects of fast-offset drugs (e.g., remifentanil, volatile anesthetics) and the electrophysiological assessment of analgesia/sedation (e.g., electroencephalogram devices, heart-rate variability, and video pupillometry). This review is particularly relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic given drug shortages and limited ICU-bed capacity.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是重症监护病房(ICU)中最具挑战性的疾病之一。ARDS 患者的镇痛和镇静管理尤其具有挑战性。召集了一个专家小组,撰写了一篇“最新”文章,为临床医生提供支持,以优化 ARDS 机械通气成人患者(包括 COVID-19 患者)的镇痛/镇静管理。目前的 ICU 镇痛/镇静指南提倡首先镇痛,最小化镇静,促进清醒、预防谵妄和早期康复,以促进呼吸机和 ICU 撤离。然而,这些策略并不总是适用于有时需要深度镇静和/或麻痹的 ARDS 患者。严重 ARDS 患者在镇痛/镇静研究中可能代表性不足,目前推荐的策略可能不可行。在减轻镇静的情况下,应通过跨专业协作系统评估和管理与痛苦相关的症状(例如疼痛和不适、焦虑、呼吸困难)和人机不同步,并优先考虑镇痛和焦虑缓解。应在给予其他药物之前系统地考虑调整呼吸机设置(例如,使用压力设定模式、自主呼吸、敏感吸气触发)。管理机械呼吸机对于避免不必要的深度镇静和/或麻痹至关重要。因此,在 ARDS 患者中应用“ABCDEF-R”捆绑包(R=呼吸驱动控制)可能是有益的。需要进一步的研究,特别是关于快速消退药物(例如瑞芬太尼、挥发性麻醉剂)的使用和长期影响,以及镇痛/镇静的电生理评估(例如脑电图设备、心率变异性和视频瞳孔测量)。鉴于药物短缺和 ICU 床位有限,这篇综述在 COVID-19 大流行期间特别相关。