Suppr超能文献

基于EWGSOP2上肢和下肢肌肉力量标准的肌肉减少症患病率差异:2015 - 2016年特罗姆瑟研究

Differences in sarcopenia prevalence between upper-body and lower-body based EWGSOP2 muscle strength criteria: the Tromsø study 2015-2016.

作者信息

Johansson Jonas, Strand Bjørn Heine, Morseth Bente, Hopstock Laila Arnesdatter, Grimsgaard Sameline

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Postboks 6050 Langnes, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.

Department of Chronic Diseases and Ageing, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01860-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) recommends grip strength and chair stand tests to be used as primary defining measures. It is unclear how either test affects prevalence estimates.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved 3498 community-dwelling participants (40-84 years) from the 7th Tromsø Study survey (2015-2016). We used grip strength, five-repetition chair stands, four-meter Walk Speed Test, Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry measurements. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression models and ROC-curves.

RESULTS

Probable and confirmed sarcopenia prevalence was 1.3 and 4.4% based on grip strength and chair stands, respectively. There was very low agreement between grip strength and chair stand cut-offs (κ = 0.07), with only 4.3% of participants defined as having probable sarcopenia overlapping in the two criteria. Participants with grip strength-based sarcopenia had lower mean height, weight, waist circumference, and appendicular lean mass relative to body height (ALM) than non-sarcopenic participants (all p < 0.001), after adjusting for multiple covariates. Conversely, participants with chair stand-based sarcopenia had similar height, higher weight, waist circumference and body fat% compared to non-sarcopenic participants (all p < 0.05). Area-under-curves (AUCs) for TUG-time were significantly larger when using chair stand instead of grip strength cut-offs (0.86, 95% CI 0.84-0.89 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Using chair stands instead of grip strength more than doubled probable sarcopenia prevalence across all ages. The two measures defined individuals of contradictory anthropometrics, body composition, and dissimilar physical function to have probable sarcopenia. Researchers should further evaluate the consequences of using different strength measures in the EWGSOP2 definition to classify sarcopenia.

摘要

背景

欧洲老年人肌少症工作组(EWGSOP2)建议将握力和从椅子上站起测试用作主要的定义指标。目前尚不清楚这两种测试如何影响患病率估计。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了来自第七次特罗姆瑟研究调查(2015 - 2016年)的3498名社区居住参与者(40 - 84岁)。我们使用了握力、五次从椅子上站起测试、四米步行速度测试、定时起立行走测试(TUG)和双能X线吸收法测量。数据使用多元线性回归模型和ROC曲线进行分析。

结果

基于握力和从椅子上站起测试,可能的和确诊的肌少症患病率分别为1.3%和4.4%。握力和从椅子上站起测试的临界值之间一致性非常低(κ = 0.07),在两种标准中,只有4.3%的参与者被定义为可能患有肌少症。在调整多个协变量后,与非肌少症参与者相比,基于握力的肌少症参与者的平均身高、体重、腰围和相对身高的四肢瘦体重(ALM)更低(所有p < 0.001)。相反,与非肌少症参与者相比,基于从椅子上站起测试的肌少症参与者的身高相似,体重、腰围和体脂百分比更高(所有p < 0.05)。当使用从椅子上站起测试而非握力临界值时,TUG时间的曲线下面积(AUC)显著更大(0.86,95% CI 0.84 - 0.89 vs. 0.75,95% CI 0.69 - 0.83)。

结论

在所有年龄段中,使用从椅子上站起测试而非握力使可能的肌少症患病率增加了一倍多。这两种测量方法将具有相互矛盾的人体测量学、身体成分和不同身体功能的个体定义为可能患有肌少症。研究人员应进一步评估在EWGSOP2定义中使用不同力量测量方法对肌少症分类的后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c18/7654146/c78fc7e1a763/12877_2020_1860_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验