Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003563.
Opioids are deemed essential medicines by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, many countries have inadequate access to them. Whether including opioids in national essential medicines lists (EMLs) influences national opioid consumption has not been evaluated.
We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine whether the listing of opioids in national EMLs was associated with consumption. We quantified the numbers and types of all opioids included in 137 national EMLs, for comparison with opioids in the WHO's Model List of Essential Medicines. Using the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) consumption statistics for 2015-2017, we assessed the relation between annual mean opioid consumption (mg/person) and the numbers of opioids included in EMLs, controlling for region, population, healthcare expenditure, life expectancy, gross domestic product, human development and corruption.
Five opioids were included in the 20th edition of the WHO's Model List of Essential Medicines: codeine, fentanyl, loperamide, methadone and morphine. On average, countries' lists included significantly (p<0.05) more opioids than the WHO's Model List. However, there were wide variations in the numbers (median 6 opioids; IQR: 5-9) and types (n=33) of opioids included in national EMLs. Morphine (95%), fentanyl (83%) and codeine (69%) were the most commonly included opioids. Most national EMLs were out of date (median publication date: 2011, IQR: 2009-2013). After adjusting for country characteristics, there was no relation between mean opioid consumption and the number of opioids in EMLs.
Including opioids in national EMLs was not associated with consumption. National EMLs should be regularly updated to reflect the availability of opioids and the populations' needs for managing pain.
世界卫生组织(WHO)认为阿片类药物是基本药物。然而,许多国家都无法充分获得这些药物。将阿片类药物列入国家基本药物清单(EML)是否会影响国家阿片类药物的消费尚未得到评估。
我们进行了一项横断面研究,以确定将阿片类药物列入国家 EML 是否与消费有关。我们量化了列入 137 个国家 EML 的所有阿片类药物的数量和类型,以与世界卫生组织基本药物标准清单中的阿片类药物进行比较。使用国际麻醉品管制局(INCB)2015-2017 年的消费统计数据,我们评估了 EML 中包含的阿片类药物数量与年平均阿片类药物消费(mg/人)之间的关系,同时控制了区域、人口、医疗支出、预期寿命、国内生产总值、人类发展和腐败情况。
世界卫生组织基本药物标准清单第 20 版包括 5 种阿片类药物:可待因、芬太尼、洛哌丁胺、美沙酮和吗啡。平均而言,各国的 EML 中包含的阿片类药物数量明显(p<0.05)多于世界卫生组织的标准清单。然而,各国 EML 中包含的阿片类药物数量(中位数 6 种;IQR:5-9)和种类(n=33)差异很大。阿片类药物中最常见的是吗啡(95%)、芬太尼(83%)和可待因(69%)。大多数国家的 EML 都已过时(中位数发布日期:2011 年,IQR:2009-2013 年)。在调整国家特征后,阿片类药物的平均消费与 EML 中的阿片类药物数量之间没有关系。
将阿片类药物列入国家 EML 与消费无关。国家 EML 应定期更新,以反映阿片类药物的供应情况和人群对疼痛管理的需求。