• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险药品计划(Medicare Part D)中 2011-2015 年用于世界卫生组织基本药物的支出:回顾性成本分析。

Spending on World Health Organization essential medicines in Medicare Part D, 2011-15: retrospective cost analysis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2019 Jul 17;366:l4257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4257.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.l4257
PMID:31315833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6635813/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the trends, drivers, and potential modifiers of increased spending by US Medicare beneficiaries on medicines deemed essential by the World Health Organization.

DESIGN

Retrospective cost analysis of Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, detailing annual generic and brand name drug prescribing and spending from 2011 through 2015 by Medicare Part D participants who filled prescriptions for WHO essential medicines.

SETTING

US Medicare System.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total and per beneficiary Medicare spending, total and per beneficiary out-of-pocket patient spending, cumulative beneficiary count, claim count, and per unit drug cost. All spending measures were adjusted for inflation and reported in 2015 US dollars.

RESULTS

Medicare Part D expenditures on 265 WHO essential medicines between 2011 and 2015 was $87.2bn (£68.4bn; €76.5bn), with annual spending increasing from $11.9bn in 2011 to $25.8bn in 2015 (116%). Patients' out-of-pocket spending for essential medicines over the same period was $12.1bn. Total annual out-of-pocket spending increased from $2.0bn to $2.9bn (47%), and annual per beneficiary out-of-pocket spending on these drugs increased from $20.42 to $21.17 (4%). Total prescription count increased from 376.1m to 498.9m (33%), and cumulative beneficiary count grew from 95.9m to 135.8m (42%). Of the essential medicines included in the study, the per unit cost of 133 (50%) agents increased faster than the average inflation rate during this period. Overall, approximately 58% of the increase in total spending during this period can be attributed to the introduction of novel agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Spending associated with essential medicines grew substantially from 2011 to 2015, driven largely by the increased use of two expensive novel drugs used in treating hepatitis C. Approximately 22% of increased total spending during this period can be attributed to increases in per unit cost of existing drugs. These trends may limit patients' access to essential drugs while also increasing healthcare system costs.

摘要

目的

描述美国医疗保险受益人在购买世界卫生组织认定的基本药物方面支出增加的趋势、驱动因素和潜在影响因素。

设计

对 2011 年至 2015 年医疗保险处方公共使用文件的回顾性成本分析,详细说明了医疗保险 D 部分参与者每年开处方使用世界卫生组织基本药物的通用名和品牌名药物的情况以及支出情况。

背景

美国医疗保险系统。

主要观察指标

医疗保险支出总额和每位受益人的支出、每位受益人的自付医疗费用支出总额和人均支出、累计受益人数、处方数量和每单位药物成本。所有支出数据均经过通胀调整,并以 2015 年美元表示。

结果

2011 年至 2015 年,医疗保险 D 部分用于 265 种世界卫生组织基本药物的支出为 872 亿美元(684 亿英镑;765 亿欧元),年支出从 2011 年的 119 亿美元增加到 2015 年的 258 亿美元(116%)。同期患者用于基本药物的自付费用为 121 亿美元。同期,总年度自付费用从 20 亿美元增加到 29 亿美元(47%),每位受益人在此类药物上的年度自付费用从 20.42 美元增加到 21.17 美元(4%)。处方总数从 3.761 亿张增加到 4.989 亿张(33%),受益人数从 9590 万增加到 1.358 亿(42%)。在纳入研究的基本药物中,133 种(50%)药物的单位成本增速快于这一时期的平均通胀率。总体而言,这一时期总支出增加的约 58%可归因于新型药物的引入。

结论

从 2011 年到 2015 年,与基本药物相关的支出大幅增长,主要原因是两种用于治疗丙型肝炎的昂贵新型药物的使用量增加。这一时期总支出增加的约 22%可归因于现有药物单位成本的增加。这些趋势可能会限制患者获得基本药物的机会,同时也增加医疗保健系统的成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba6/6635813/4a0199f7c824/lida047497.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba6/6635813/be59ee363e23/lida047497.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba6/6635813/70daf48e2d7d/lida047497.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba6/6635813/4a0199f7c824/lida047497.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba6/6635813/be59ee363e23/lida047497.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba6/6635813/70daf48e2d7d/lida047497.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba6/6635813/4a0199f7c824/lida047497.f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Spending on World Health Organization essential medicines in Medicare Part D, 2011-15: retrospective cost analysis.医疗保险药品计划(Medicare Part D)中 2011-2015 年用于世界卫生组织基本药物的支出:回顾性成本分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 17;366:l4257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4257.
2
Medicare Part D Payments for Topical Steroids: Rising Costs and Potential Savings.医疗保险D部分用于局部用类固醇药物的支付:成本上升与潜在节省
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Aug 1;153(8):755-759. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.1130.
3
Medicare Spending on Brand-name Combination Medications vs Their Generic Constituents.医疗保险支出在品牌组合药物与它们的通用成分上的对比。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):650-656. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11439.
4
Patient and Payer Incentives to Use Patented Brand-Name Drugs vs Authorized Generic Drugs in Medicare Part D.医疗保险计划 D 中患者和付款人的专利品牌药与授权仿制药使用激励因素
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Dec 1;181(12):1605-1611. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5997.
5
Trends in Utilization and Cost of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Therapies Among Medicare Beneficiaries: An Analysis From the Medicare Part D Database.医疗保险受益人群中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低疗法的使用和成本趋势:来自医疗保险部分 D 数据库的分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jan 1;6(1):92-96. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3723.
6
Analysis of Proposed Medicare Part B to Part D Shift With Associated Changes in Total Spending and Patient Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs.分析拟议的医疗保险 B 部分到 D 部分的转变以及处方药总支出和患者自付费用的相关变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):374-380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6417.
7
Five-year impact of Medicare Part D coverage gap reform on drug expenditures and utilization.医疗保险部分 D 覆盖缺口改革对药品支出和利用的五年影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):56-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13660. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
8
Comparison of Out-of-Pocket Spending on Ultra-Expensive Drugs in Medicare Part D vs Commercial Insurance.医疗保险部分 D 与商业保险中超昂贵药物自付费用比较。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 May 5;4(5):e231090. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1090.
9
Employer drug benefit plans and spending on prescription drugs.雇主药物福利计划与处方药支出
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1733-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1733.
10
The relationship between the number of available therapeutic options and government payer (medicare part D) spending on topical drug products.可供选择的治疗方案数量与政府支付者(医疗保险部分 D)在局部药物产品上的支出之间的关系。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2020 Oct;312(8):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02042-9. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Equivalence between Generic Versus Branded Antibiotics: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.通用型抗生素与品牌抗生素之间的临床等效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 21;12(5):935. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050935.
2
The Use of Mebendazole in COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Retrospective Single Center Study.甲苯咪唑在新冠肺炎患者中的应用:一项观察性回顾性单中心研究。
Adv Virol. 2022 Dec 10;2022:3014686. doi: 10.1155/2022/3014686. eCollection 2022.
3
Global status of essential medicine selection: a systematic comparison of national essential medicine lists with recommendations by WHO.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Market Competition and Prices of Generic Topical Dermatology Drugs.市场竞争与皮肤科外用药品通用名药物价格的关联。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Dec 1;154(12):1441-1446. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3798.
2
Prices of Generic Drugs Associated with Numbers of Manufacturers.与制造商数量相关的仿制药价格。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2597-2598. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1711899.
3
Trends in Pricing and Generic Competition Within the Oral Antibiotic Drug Market in the United States.美国口服抗生素药物市场的定价趋势和仿制药竞争
全球基本药物选择状况:国家基本药物目录与世界卫生组织推荐目录的系统比较。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):e053349. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053349.
4
Relation between opioid consumption and inclusion of opioids in 137 national essential medicines lists.阿片类药物消耗与 137 个国家基本药物目录中包含阿片类药物之间的关系。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003563.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1848-1852. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix634.
4
The Price of Crossing the Border for Medications.药品跨境的代价。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):311-313. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1704489.
5
The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform.美国处方药价格居高不下:根源与改革前景。
JAMA. 2016;316(8):858-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11237.
6
Time Trends in Prevalence of Chronic Diseases and Multimorbidity Not Only due to Aging: Data from General Practices and Health Surveys.慢性病和多重疾病患病率的时间趋势:不仅归因于老龄化,来自全科医疗和健康调查的数据
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160264. eCollection 2016.
7
Drug Regulation and Pricing--Can Regulators Influence Affordability?药品监管与定价——监管机构能否影响可负担性?
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 12;374(19):1807-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1601294.
8
Evaluating availability and price of essential medicines in Boston area (Massachusetts, USA) using WHO/HAI methodology.使用世界卫生组织/卫生行动促进国际组织(WHO/HAI)的方法评估美国马萨诸塞州波士顿地区基本药物的可及性和价格。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016 Apr 5;9:12. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0059-5. eCollection 2016.
9
Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs.制药行业的创新:研发成本的新估计
J Health Econ. 2016 May;47:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
High-cost generic drugs--implications for patients and policymakers.高价仿制药——对患者和政策制定者的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 13;371(20):1859-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1408376.