Mills Kale, Nilsen Kari
University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wichita, KS.
Kans J Med. 2020 Oct 20;13:248-259. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol13.14761. eCollection 2020.
In the past few decades, patients expressing the idea that vaccines are unsafe or unneeded have been experienced increasingly by physicians and other healthcare providers. Discussions with patients regarding their reasons for vaccine refusals are important, as it may provide information that can be utilized in an intervention to increase vaccination rates and combat the spread of diseases that are making a resurgence in the United States. The main objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of family physicians as to why parents in Kansas may be vaccine hesitant.
An electronic survey was distributed to family physicians in the State of Kansas via the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Family Medicine Research and Data Information Office (FM RADIO). Several aspects of physician perceptions regarding patients' vaccine hesitancy were measured in this study, including vaccines that are most often refused, reasons for refusing vaccinations, as well as what responses physicians employ when presented with vaccine concerns.
The majority of physicians surveyed have experienced vaccine hesitancy or refusal in their practice, and the human papillomavirus (HPV) and flu vaccines were reported to be the primary vaccines refused for children. In addition, physicians reported frequently employing various practices in response to vaccine refusals, including requiring parents to sign a form (40%) and dismissing families from their practice (1.5%). Physician perceptions on the reasons as to why parents/guardians refuse vaccinations also were measured, and the most common response was that parents possess a fear of long-term complications for their children as a result of vaccines (74%). Additionally, the three most commonly refused vaccines were HPV, influenza, and measles, mumps, and rubella.
Physicians must not only deal with time constraints that vaccine hesitant discussions require, but also must try and implement discussions or interventions suited to the varying reasons why parents/guardians refuse vaccines to convince parents of their safety. The results suggested that vaccine refusals by parents/guardians seemed to be affecting Kansas family physicians' clinics in more than one way. This study could be a useful tool to help physicians better understand why vaccine refusals occur and be able to combat unwarranted concerns about vaccines.
在过去几十年里,医生和其他医疗服务提供者越来越多地遇到表达疫苗不安全或不需要这种观点的患者。与患者讨论他们拒绝接种疫苗的原因很重要,因为这可能提供可用于干预措施的信息,以提高疫苗接种率并对抗在美国卷土重来的疾病传播。本研究的主要目的是探讨家庭医生对堪萨斯州父母可能对接种疫苗犹豫不决的原因的看法。
通过堪萨斯大学医学院威奇托分校家庭医学研究与数据信息办公室(FM RADIO)向堪萨斯州的家庭医生发放电子调查问卷。本研究测量了医生对患者疫苗犹豫的几个方面的看法,包括最常被拒绝的疫苗、拒绝接种疫苗的原因,以及当出现疫苗相关担忧时医生采取的应对措施。
接受调查的大多数医生在其行医过程中都遇到过疫苗犹豫或拒绝的情况,据报告,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗和流感疫苗是儿童最常被拒绝接种的主要疫苗。此外,医生报告经常采取各种措施应对疫苗拒绝情况,包括要求家长签署表格(40%)和将家庭从其诊所除名(1.5%)。还测量了医生对父母/监护人拒绝接种疫苗原因的看法,最常见的回答是父母担心疫苗会给孩子带来长期并发症(74%)。此外,三种最常被拒绝的疫苗是HPV疫苗、流感疫苗以及麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗。
医生不仅要应对疫苗犹豫讨论所需的时间限制,还必须尝试开展适合父母/监护人拒绝接种疫苗的各种不同原因的讨论或干预措施,以使父母相信疫苗的安全性。结果表明,父母/监护人拒绝接种疫苗似乎以多种方式影响着堪萨斯州家庭医生的诊所。这项研究可能是一个有用的工具,有助于医生更好地理解疫苗拒绝为何发生,并能够消除对疫苗的无端担忧。