Bacigalupo Sonny A, Dixon Linda K, Gubbins Simon, Kucharski Adam J, Drewe Julian A
Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 26;8:e10221. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10221. eCollection 2020.
Wild animals are the source of many pathogens of livestock and humans. Concerns about the potential transmission of economically important and zoonotic diseases from wildlife have led to increased surveillance at the livestock-wildlife interface. Knowledge of the types, frequency and duration of contacts between livestock and wildlife is necessary to identify risk factors for disease transmission and to design possible mitigation strategies. Observing the behaviour of many wildlife species is challenging due to their cryptic nature and avoidance of humans, meaning there are relatively few studies in this area. Further, a consensus on the definition of what constitutes a 'contact' between wildlife and livestock is lacking. A systematic review was conducted to investigate which livestock-wildlife contacts have been studied and why, as well as the methods used to observe each species. Over 30,000 publications were screened, of which 122 fulfilled specific criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The majority of studies examined cattle contacts with badgers or with deer; studies involving wild pig contacts with cattle or with domestic pigs were the next most frequent. There was a range of observational methods including motion-activated cameras and global positioning system collars. As a result of the wide variation and lack of consensus in the definitions of direct and indirect contacts, we developed a unified framework to define livestock-wildlife contacts that is sufficiently flexible to be applied to most wildlife and livestock species for non-vector-borne diseases. We hope this framework will help standardise the collection and reporting of contact data; a valuable step towards being able to compare the efficacy of wildlife-livestock observation methods. In doing so, it may aid the development of better disease transmission models and improve the design and effectiveness of interventions to reduce or prevent disease transmission.
野生动物是许多家畜和人类病原体的来源。对野生动物传播具有经济重要性的疾病和人畜共患病的潜在担忧,导致了在牲畜与野生动物交界处加强监测。了解家畜与野生动物之间接触的类型、频率和持续时间,对于确定疾病传播的风险因素以及设计可能的缓解策略至关重要。由于许多野生动物具有隐秘性且会避开人类,观察它们的行为具有挑战性,这意味着该领域的研究相对较少。此外,对于什么构成野生动物与家畜之间的“接触”,目前还缺乏共识。我们进行了一项系统综述,以调查哪些家畜与野生动物的接触已被研究以及原因,以及用于观察每个物种的方法。筛选了超过30000篇出版物,其中122篇符合纳入分析的特定标准。大多数研究考察了牛与獾或与鹿的接触;涉及野猪与牛或与家猪接触的研究次之。观察方法多种多样,包括运动激活相机和全球定位系统项圈。由于在直接接触和间接接触的定义上存在广泛差异且缺乏共识,我们制定了一个统一的框架来定义家畜与野生动物的接触,该框架足够灵活,可应用于大多数野生动物和家畜物种的非媒介传播疾病。我们希望这个框架将有助于规范接触数据的收集和报告;这是朝着能够比较野生动物与家畜观察方法的效果迈出的重要一步。这样做可能有助于开发更好的疾病传播模型,并改善减少或预防疾病传播的干预措施的设计和有效性。