Suppr超能文献

评估2019冠状病毒病相关干扰因素对美国男男性行为者艾滋病毒感染率和死亡率的潜在影响:一项建模研究

Estimating the potential impact of COVID-19-related disruptions on HIV incidence and mortality among men who have sex with men in the United States: a modelling study.

作者信息

Mitchell Kate M, Dimitrov Dobromir, Silhol Romain, Geidelberg Lily, Moore Mia, Liu Albert, Beyrer Chris, Mayer Kenneth H, Baral Stefan, Boily Marie-Claude

机构信息

MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

HIV Prevention Trials Network Modelling Centre, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2020 Nov 3:2020.10.30.20222893. doi: 10.1101/2020.10.30.20222893.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, gay and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States (US) report similar or fewer sexual partners and reduced HIV testing and care access. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use has declined. We estimated the potential impact of COVID-19 on HIV incidence and mortality among US MSM.

METHODS

We used a calibrated HIV transmission model for MSM in Baltimore, Maryland, and available data on COVID-19-related disruptions to predict impacts of data-driven reductions in sexual partners(0%,25%,50%), condom use(5%), HIV testing(20%), viral suppression(10%), PrEP initiations(72%), PrEP use(9%) and ART initiations(50%), exploring different disruption durations and magnitudes. We estimated the median (95% credible interval) change in cumulative new HIV infections and deaths among MSM over one and five years, compared with a scenario without COVID-19-related disruptions.

FINDINGS

A six-month 25% reduction in sexual partners among Baltimore MSM, without HIV service changes, could reduce new HIV infections by 12·2%(11·7,12·8%) and 3·0%(2·6,3·4%) over one and five years, respectively. In the absence of changes in sexual behaviour, the six-month data-driven disruptions to condom use, testing, viral suppression, PrEP initiations, PrEP use and ART initiations combined were predicted to increase new HIV infections by 10·5%(5·8,16·5%) over one year, and by 3·5%(2·1,5·4%) over five years. A 25% reduction in partnerships offsets the negative impact of these combined service disruptions on new HIV infections (overall reduction 3·9%(-1·0,7·4%), 0·0%(-1·4,0·9%) over one, five years, respectively), but not on HIV deaths (corresponding increases 11·0%(6·2,17·7%), 2·6%(1·5,4·3%)). The predicted impacts of reductions in partnerships or viral suppression doubled if they lasted 12 months or if disruptions were twice as large.

INTERPRETATION

Maintaining access to ART and adherence support is of the utmost importance to minimise excess HIV-related mortality due to COVID-19 restrictions in the US, even if accompanied by reductions in sexual partnerships.

FUNDING

NIH.

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT

The COVID-19 pandemic and responses to it have disrupted HIV prevention and treatment services and led to changes in sexual risk behaviour in the United States, but the overall potential impact on HIV transmission and HIV-related mortality is not known. We searched PubMed for articles documenting COVID-related disruptions to HIV prevention and treatment and changes in sexual risk behaviour in the United States, published between 1 January and 7 October 2020, with no language restrictions, using the terms COVID* AND (HIV OR AIDS) AND ("United States" OR US). We identified three cross-sectional surveys assessing changes in sexual risk behaviour among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States, one finding a reduction, one a slight increase, and one no change in partner numbers during COVID-19 restrictions. Two of these studies also found reductions in reported HIV testing, HIV care and/or access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among MSM due to COVID-19. A separate study from a San Francisco clinic found declines in viral suppression among its clients during lockdown. We searched PubMed for articles estimating the impact of COVID-related disruptions on HIV transmission and mortality published between 1 January 2020 and 12 October 2020, with no language restrictions, using the following terms: COVID* AND model* AND (HIV OR AIDS). We identified two published studies which had used mathematical modelling to estimate the impact of hypothetical COVID-19-related disruptions to HIV programmes on HIV-related deaths and/or new HIV infections in Africa, another published study using modelling to estimate the impact of COVID-19-related disruptions and linked HIV and SARS-CoV-2 testing on new HIV infections in six cities in the United States, and a pre-print reporting modelling of the impact of COVID-19-related disruptions on HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in Atlanta, United States. None of these studies were informed by data on the size of these disruptions. The two African studies and the Atlanta study assessed the impact of disruptions to different healthcare disruptions separately, and all found that the greatest negative impacts on new HIV infections and/or deaths would arise from interruptions to antiretroviral therapy. They all found smaller effects on HIV-related mortality and/or incidence from other healthcare disruptions, including HIV testing, PrEP use and condom supplies. The United States study assessing the impact of linked HIV and SARS-CoV-2 testing estimated that this could substantially reduce HIV incidence. We used mathematical modelling to derive estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions on HIV incidence and mortality among MSM in the United States, directly informed by data from the United States on disruptions to HIV testing, antiretroviral therapy and pre-exposure prophylaxis services and reported changes in sexual risk behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also assessed the impact of an HIV testing campaign during COVID-19 lockdown. In the United States, maintaining access to antiretroviral therapy and adherence support for both existing and new users will be crucial to minimize excess HIV-related deaths arising from the COVID-19 pandemic among men who have sex with men. While reductions in sexual risk behaviour may offset increases in new HIV infections arising from disruptions to HIV prevention and treatment services, this will not offset the additional HIV-related deaths which are also predicted to occur. There are mixed findings on the impact of an HIV testing campaign among US MSM during COVID-19 lockdown. Together, these studies highlight the importance of maintaining effective HIV treatment provision during the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,美国的男同性恋者及其他男男性行为者(MSM)报告称性伴侣数量相似或减少,且艾滋病毒检测及护理服务的可及性降低。暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用有所下降。我们估计了新冠疫情对美国男男性行为者中艾滋病毒发病率和死亡率的潜在影响。

方法

我们使用了针对马里兰州巴尔的摩市男男性行为者的校准艾滋病毒传播模型,以及与新冠疫情相关干扰的现有数据,来预测基于数据驱动的性伴侣数量减少(0%、25%、50%)、避孕套使用减少(5%)、艾滋病毒检测减少(20%)、病毒抑制降低(10%)、PrEP起始使用减少(72%)、PrEP使用减少(9%)和抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)起始使用减少(50%)所产生的影响,同时探索不同的干扰持续时间和程度。我们估计了与无新冠疫情相关干扰的情况相比,男男性行为者在1年和5年内累积新增艾滋病毒感染和死亡人数的中位数(95%可信区间)变化。

结果

在艾滋病毒服务无变化的情况下,巴尔的摩市男男性行为者的性伴侣数量在6个月内减少25%,在1年和5年内分别可使新增艾滋病毒感染减少12.2%(11.7%,12.8%)和3.0%(2.6%,3.4%)。在性行为无变化的情况下,预计6个月内由数据驱动的避孕套使用、检测、病毒抑制、PrEP起始使用、PrEP使用和ART起始使用的综合干扰,将使1年内新增艾滋病毒感染增加10.5%(5.8%,16.5%),5年内增加3.5%(2.1%,5.4%)。性伴侣数量减少25%可抵消这些综合服务干扰对新增艾滋病毒感染的负面影响(总体减少3.9%(-1.0%,7.4%),1年和5年内分别为0.0%(-1.4%,0.9%)),但对艾滋病毒死亡无影响(相应增加11.0%(6.2%,17.7%),2.6%(1.5%,4.3%))。如果性伴侣数量减少或病毒抑制降低持续12个月或干扰程度加倍,预测的影响将增加一倍。

解读

即使性伴侣数量减少,维持抗逆转录病毒治疗及依从性支持的可及性对于将美国因新冠疫情限制导致的艾滋病毒相关超额死亡率降至最低至关重要。

资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院。

研究背景

新冠疫情及其应对措施扰乱了艾滋病毒预防和治疗服务,并导致美国性风险行为发生变化,但对艾滋病毒传播和艾滋病毒相关死亡率的总体潜在影响尚不清楚。我们在PubMed上搜索了2020年1月1日至10月7日期间发表的、记录美国新冠疫情对艾滋病毒预防和治疗的干扰以及性风险行为变化的文章,无语言限制,检索词为COVID* AND (HIV OR AIDS) AND ("United States" OR US)。我们确定了三项横断面调查,评估美国男男性行为者在新冠疫情限制期间性风险行为的变化,一项发现性伴侣数量减少,一项略有增加,一项无变化。其中两项研究还发现,由于新冠疫情,男男性行为者报告的艾滋病毒检测、艾滋病毒护理和/或暴露前预防(PrEP)的可及性降低。旧金山一家诊所的另一项单独研究发现,封锁期间其客户的病毒抑制率下降。我们在PubMed上搜索了2020年1月1日至10月12日期间发表的、估计新冠疫情相关干扰对艾滋病毒传播和死亡率影响的文章,无语言限制,检索词为:COVID* AND model* AND (HIV OR AIDS)。我们确定了两项已发表的研究,它们使用数学模型估计了假设的新冠疫情相关干扰对非洲艾滋病毒项目的影响,以及对艾滋病毒相关死亡和/或新增艾滋病毒感染的影响;另一项已发表的研究使用模型估计了新冠疫情相关干扰以及艾滋病毒与SARS-CoV-2联合检测对美国六个城市新增艾滋病毒感染的影响;还有一篇预印本报告了新冠疫情相关干扰对美国亚特兰大男男性行为者艾滋病毒发病率影响的模型。这些研究均未依据这些干扰规模的数据。两项非洲研究和亚特兰大研究分别评估了不同医疗保健干扰的影响,均发现对抗逆转录病毒治疗的中断对新增艾滋病毒感染和/或死亡的负面影响最大。他们都发现,包括艾滋病毒检测、PrEP使用和避孕套供应在内的其他医疗保健干扰对艾滋病毒相关死亡率和/或发病率的影响较小。评估艾滋病毒与SARS-CoV-2联合检测影响的美国研究估计,这可能会大幅降低艾滋病毒发病率。我们使用数学模型来估计新冠疫情及相关限制对美国男男性行为者艾滋病毒发病率和死亡率的潜在影响,该模型直接依据美国关于艾滋病毒检测、抗逆转录病毒治疗和暴露前预防服务干扰的数据,以及新冠疫情期间报告的性风险行为变化。我们还评估了新冠疫情封锁期间艾滋病毒检测活动的影响。在美国,维持现有和新用户对抗逆转录病毒治疗及依从性支持的可及性对于将新冠疫情期间男男性行为者中因艾滋病毒相关死亡人数降至最低至关重要。虽然性风险行为的减少可能会抵消艾滋病毒预防和治疗服务中断导致的新增艾滋病毒感染增加,但这并不能抵消预计也会发生的额外艾滋病毒相关死亡。关于新冠疫情封锁期间美国男男性行为者中艾滋病毒检测活动的影响,研究结果不一。这些研究共同强调了在新冠疫情期间维持有效艾滋病毒治疗服务的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15f9/7654885/4b3b550ddca0/nihpp-2020.10.30.20222893-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验