Suppr超能文献

通过ScanVIT方法快速检测水样中的军团菌属:酸处理与热处理的比较

Rapid detection of Legionella spp in water samples by ScanVIT method: comparison of acid vs heat treatment.

作者信息

Di Maio S, Messina G, Burgassi S, Cardaci R, Amodeo D, De Marco F, Serafini A, Lenzi D

机构信息

Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Medical Management, "Le Scotte" Teaching Hospital, Siena, Ital.

出版信息

Ann Ig. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(6):635-647. doi: 10.7416/ai.2020.2385.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A rapid detection of Legionella bacteria in water samples is crucial to minimize the risk of acquiring infections, especially in health care facilities. Different detection methods and different decontamination procedures have been reported to affect the recovery of Legionella spp. Our goal was to test the recovery of Legionella pneumophila and Legionella non-pneumophila species using a kit based on non-specific and species-specific probes to treat water samples after two different decontamination procedures.

METHODS

The study was conducted with samples collected in the teaching hospital "Le Scotte" of Siena (Italy). Waters samples were analyzed by: i) ScanVIT method after treatment with acids; ii) ScanVIT method after heating; and iii) cultural standard method after heating. The results of the decontamination procedures and the detection methods were evaluated by comparing the number of Legionella-positive and -negative samples, and the recovery rates (CFU l-1) obtained by ScanVIT and the standard method.

RESULTS

We find that ScanVIT method is highly sensitive with both decontamination treatments, yielding a higher recovery of L. pneumophila compared to the standard method. Conversely, ScanVIT associated with the acid-treatment yielded the highest recovery of L. non-pneumophila.

CONCLUSIONS

The acid-treatment combined to the ScanVIT method increases the recovery of L. non-pneumophila in water samples compared to both ScanVIT associated with heat-treatment and standard culture method. Thus, this method may represent the best choice to detect L. non-pneumophila in water samples and reduce the risk of infection due to underestimation of Legionella loads.

摘要

背景

快速检测水样中的军团菌对于将感染风险降至最低至关重要,尤其是在医疗保健机构中。据报道,不同的检测方法和不同的净化程序会影响军团菌属的回收率。我们的目标是使用基于非特异性和种特异性探针的试剂盒,在两种不同的净化程序后处理水样,以测试嗜肺军团菌和非嗜肺军团菌的回收率。

方法

本研究使用从意大利锡耶纳的“Le Scotte”教学医院采集的样本进行。水样通过以下方法进行分析:i)用酸处理后的ScanVIT方法;ii)加热后的ScanVIT方法;iii)加热后的培养标准方法。通过比较军团菌阳性和阴性样本的数量以及ScanVIT和标准方法获得的回收率(CFU l-1)来评估净化程序和检测方法的结果。

结果

我们发现,ScanVIT方法在两种净化处理中都具有高度敏感性,与标准方法相比,嗜肺军团菌的回收率更高。相反,与酸处理相结合的ScanVIT方法使非嗜肺军团菌的回收率最高。

结论

与热处理相关的ScanVIT方法和标准培养方法相比,酸处理与ScanVIT方法相结合可提高水样中非嗜肺军团菌的回收率。因此,该方法可能是检测水样中非嗜肺军团菌并降低因军团菌负荷估计不足而导致感染风险的最佳选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验