Stanford Emily, Delage Hélène
Psycholinguistics Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 15;11:551824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551824. eCollection 2020.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is commonly associated with deficits in executive functions executive functions (EF), but children with this disorder frequently demonstrate co-occurring morphosyntactic impairment when assessed using standardized tests. On the other hand, children with developmental language disorder (DLD), a population defined by impaired linguistic functioning, are often diagnosed with comorbid EF deficits. We investigated EF and morphosyntax in 60 French-speaking children aged six to 12: 20 with typical development (TD), 20 with ADHD, and 20 with DLD. To obtain an EF profile for the different cognitive groups, we used standardized tests to assess lower-order EF skills, (i) selective attention and (ii) short-term memory capacity, and higher-order EF skills, (i) working memory capacity and (ii) attention shifting. To test morphosyntax, we used (i) a standardized omnibus test that elicited a variety of complex structures and (ii) a more fine-grained probe test that assessed the production of third person object clitic pronouns, a clinical marker of DLD in French. Children with ADHD and DLD were associated with different EF and morphosyntactic profiles: children in the ADHD group demonstrated higher-order EF weakness and difficulty on the omnibus morphosyntax task, whereas children with DLD showed both lower- and higher-order limitations and struggled with both morphosyntax tasks. Our findings indicate that deficits in morphosyntax are not characteristic of ADHD but that the performance of children with ADHD can mimic morphosyntactic impairment when all-encompassing omnibus tests evaluating various and unpredictable structures are used. If morphosyntax is tested using reliable markers of atypical language development and external cognitive-load factors are optimally reduced, there are significant discrepancies in the observed ADHD-DLD outcomes. Clinical implications that include perspectives for the differential diagnosis of ADHD and DLD are discussed.
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)通常与执行功能缺陷相关,但使用标准化测试评估时,患有这种障碍的儿童经常表现出同时存在的形态句法损伤。另一方面,发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童,这是一群由语言功能受损定义的人群,常常被诊断出合并执行功能缺陷。我们调查了60名6至12岁说法语儿童的执行功能和形态句法:20名发育正常(TD)儿童、20名患有ADHD的儿童和20名患有DLD的儿童。为了获得不同认知组的执行功能概况,我们使用标准化测试来评估低阶执行功能技能,(i)选择性注意力和(ii)短期记忆容量,以及高阶执行功能技能,(i)工作记忆容量和(ii)注意力转移。为了测试形态句法,我们使用了(i)一项标准化综合测试,该测试引出了各种复杂结构,以及(ii)一项更精细的探测测试,该测试评估第三人称宾语小品词代词的产出,这是法语中DLD的一个临床标志。患有ADHD和DLD的儿童与不同的执行功能和形态句法概况相关:ADHD组的儿童在综合形态句法任务上表现出高阶执行功能弱点和困难,而患有DLD的儿童则表现出低阶和高阶限制,并且在两项形态句法任务上都有困难。我们的研究结果表明,形态句法缺陷不是ADHD的特征,但当使用评估各种不可预测结构的综合性综合测试时,患有ADHD的儿童的表现可能会模仿形态句法损伤。如果使用非典型语言发展的可靠标志来测试形态句法,并且最佳地减少外部认知负荷因素,那么在观察到的ADHD-DLD结果中会有显著差异。讨论了包括ADHD和DLD鉴别诊断观点在内的临床意义。