Dexter Franklin, Epstein Richard H, Shi Pengyi
Anesthesiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Anesthesiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Oct 8;12(10):e10847. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10847.
When the hospital census is high, perioperative medical directors or operating room (OR) managers sometimes need to review with surgical departments as to which surgical cases scheduled to be performed within the next three days may need to be postponed. Although distributions of hospital length of stay (LOS) are highly skewed, a surprisingly effective summary measure is the percentage of patients previously undergoing the same category of procedure as that scheduled whose LOS was zero or one day. We evaluated how to forecast each hospital's percentage of cases with LOS of <2 days, segmented by category of surgical procedure. The large teaching hospital studied included several inpatient adult surgical suites, an ambulatory surgery center, and a pediatric surgical suite. We included 98,540 cases in a training dataset to predict 24,338 cases in a test dataset. For each category of procedure, we calculated the cumulative count of cases among quarters, from the most recent quarter, second most recent quarter, and so forth up to the quarter resulting in at least 800 cases. If every quarter combined had fewer than 800 cases for a given category of procedure, we included all cases for that category. For each combination of category and quarter, we used the cumulative counts of cases and cases with LOS of <2 days, excluding the current quarter. Then, for each category of procedure, and for each of the preceding quarters included for the category, we used the cumulative counts to calculate the asymptotic standard error (SE) for the proportion of cases with LOS of <2 days. If all preceding quarters combined provided a sample size such that the estimated SE for the proportion exceeded 1.25%, we included all preceding quarters. The observed absolute percentage error was 0.76% (SE: 0.12%). This error was nearly 100-fold smaller than the percentage of cases to which it would be used (i.e., 0.76% versus 73.1% with LOS of <2 days). The principal weakness of the forecasting methodology was a small bias caused by a progressive reduction in the overall LOS over time. However, this bias is unlikely to be important for predicting cases' LOS when the hospital census is high. When performing these time series calculations quarterly, a reasonable approach is to perform calculations of both case counts and SEs for each category of procedure. We recommend using the fewest historical quarters, starting with the most recent quarter, either with at least 800 cases or an estimated asymptotic SE for the estimated percentage no greater than 1.25%. Applying our methodology with local LOS data will allow OR managers to estimate the number of patients on the elective OR schedule each day who will be hospitalized for longer than overnight, facilitating communication and decision-making with surgical departments when census considerations constrain the ability to run a full surgical schedule.
当医院的普查人数较多时,围手术期医疗主任或手术室(OR)经理有时需要与外科科室共同商讨,确定未来三天内计划进行的哪些外科手术可能需要推迟。尽管医院住院时间(LOS)的分布严重偏态,但一个出奇有效的汇总指标是,之前接受与计划手术相同类型手术的患者中,住院时间为零天或一天的患者百分比。我们评估了如何按外科手术类别对每家医院住院时间小于2天的病例百分比进行预测。所研究的大型教学医院包括几个成人住院手术科室、一个门诊手术中心和一个儿科手术科室。我们在训练数据集中纳入了98540例病例,以预测测试数据集中的24338例病例。对于每类手术,我们计算了从最近一个季度开始,到倒数第二个季度等直至某个季度的病例累计数,该季度的病例数至少达到800例。如果给定手术类别的每个季度合并病例数少于800例,我们就纳入该类别的所有病例。对于手术类别和季度的每种组合,我们使用病例累计数以及住院时间小于2天的病例数(不包括当前季度)。然后,对于每类手术以及该类别所包含的每个前序季度,我们使用累计数来计算住院时间小于2天的病例比例的渐近标准误差(SE)。如果所有前序季度合并后的样本量使得该比例的估计标准误差超过1.25%,我们就纳入所有前序季度。观察到的绝对百分比误差为0.76%(标准误差:0.12%)。这个误差比它所适用的病例百分比小近100倍(即0.76% 对比住院时间小于2天的病例的73.1%)。预测方法的主要弱点是随着时间推移总体住院时间逐渐减少所导致的一个小偏差。然而,当医院普查人数较多时,这个偏差对于预测病例的住院时间可能并不重要。按季度进行这些时间序列计算时,一种合理的方法是针对每类手术进行病例数和标准误差的计算。我们建议从最近一个季度开始,使用最少的历史季度,要么病例数至少达到800例,要么估计百分比的渐近标准误差不大于1.25%。将我们的方法应用于本地住院时间数据,将使手术室经理能够估计择期手术日程上每天需要住院超过一晚的患者数量,在普查因素限制全面手术日程安排能力时,便于与外科科室进行沟通和决策。