Kim Kyeong Jin, Song Ji Eun, Kim Ji Yoon, Bae Jae Hyun, Kim Nam Hoon, Yoo Hye Jin, Kim Hee Young, Seo Ji A, Kim Nan Hee, Lee Juneyoung, Choi Kyung Mook, Baik Sei Hyun, Kim Sin Gon
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1235. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5222.
Radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment is a standard treatment in differentiated thyroid cancer (TC). However, its adverse effects on cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have not been clearly elucidated.
In this retrospective cohort study based on the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort (2002-2015), we analyzed 4,845 patients with TC with a median follow-up of 66 months. We evaluated and compared the risk of CVD between patients treated with and without RAI therapy. The primary CVD outcome was defined as a composite of ischemic stroke (IS), ischemic heart disease (IHD), hemorrhagic stroke (HS), or heart failure (HF).
Overall, 2,533 patients (52.3%) received RAI treatment with a median cumulative dosage of 103 mCi [interquartile range (IQR), 40-162 mCi]. The incidence of the primary CVD outcome in patients who did not receive RAI therapy and those who did was 17.32 [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.07-19.90] and 13.96 (95% CI, 12.17-16.01) per 1,000 person-years, respectively, indicating an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71-1.07) after multivariate adjustments for variable confounding factors. The risks of IS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.34), IHD (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71-1.13), HS (HR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.49-2.09), and HF (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.49-1.63) were comparable between the patients who received RAI therapy and those who did not. There was no cumulative dose-dependent risk for CVD in TC patients who received RAI treatment.
RAI treatment is a prevalent and crucial treatment for TC, and has been used in more than half of TC patients in Korea from 2004 to 2015. This study found no significant between-group difference for the CVD risk in patients with TC who received RAI treatment and those who did not, giving further evidence to allay concerns related to the adverse effects of RAI.
放射性碘(RAI)治疗是分化型甲状腺癌(TC)的标准治疗方法。然而,其对心血管疾病(CVD)的不良影响尚未得到明确阐明。
在这项基于韩国国民健康保险服务-国民健康筛查队列(2002 - 2015年)的回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了4845例TC患者,中位随访时间为66个月。我们评估并比较了接受RAI治疗和未接受RAI治疗的患者发生CVD的风险。主要CVD结局定义为缺血性卒中(IS)、缺血性心脏病(IHD)、出血性卒中(HS)或心力衰竭(HF)的综合。
总体而言,2533例患者(52.3%)接受了RAI治疗,中位累积剂量为103毫居里[四分位间距(IQR),40 - 162毫居里]。未接受RAI治疗的患者和接受RAI治疗的患者中,主要CVD结局的发生率分别为每1000人年17.32[95%置信区间(CI),15.07 - 19.90]和13.96(95%CI,12.17 - 16.01),这表明在对可变混杂因素进行多变量调整后,调整后的风险比(HR)为0.87(95%CI,0.71 - 1.07)。接受RAI治疗的患者和未接受RAI治疗的患者在IS(HR,0.83;95%CI,0.51 - 1.34)、IHD(HR,0.90;95%CI,0.71 - 1.13)、HS(HR 1.01;95%CI,0.49 - 2.09)和HF(HR 0.89;95%CI,0.49 - 1.63)方面的风险相当。接受RAI治疗的TC患者中不存在CVD的累积剂量依赖性风险。
RAI治疗是TC的一种普遍且关键的治疗方法,2004年至2015年期间在韩国超过一半的TC患者中使用。本研究发现,接受RAI治疗的TC患者和未接受RAI治疗的患者在CVD风险方面没有显著的组间差异,这为减轻对RAI不良反应的担忧提供了进一步的证据。