Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术的时机与临床结果。

Timing of carotid endarterectomy and clinical outcomes.

作者信息

Azhar Bilal, Wafi Arsalan, Budge James, Loftus Ian

机构信息

St Georges Vascular Institute, St Georges University London, London, UK.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1267. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1130.

Abstract

The timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis has evolved in practice over time. Key landmark trials outlined the benefit of performing CEA in the recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, defined as revascularisation within 6 months of the index neurological event. Further evidence and sub-analysis demonstrate that performing CEA within 2 weeks of symptoms has the maximal benefit in reducing stroke free survival and is associated with a safe perioperative complication profile. This has translated into guideline recommendations and widespread clinical practice. The case for performing urgent CEA (within 48 hours of index neurological event) over early CEA (within 2 weeks) has been put forward and studied. Data examining perioperative complications for urgent CEA are mostly derived from retrospective single series studies. A moderate balance exists in the literature for the safety and risk of urgent CEA. Although many studies present acceptable perioperative stroke and mortality rates associated with urgent CEA, evidence still exists that the perioperative complications may not be insignificant. This is particularly the case if the presenting neurology is a stroke, rather than a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or amaurosis fugax. This should be contextualised in the practice of modern aggressive medical therapy with dual antiplatelets and statins, with evidence suggesting a reduction in recurrent ischaemic events prior to surgical intervention. Careful patient selection, presenting neurology and medical therapy is likely to be a key feature in considering urgent CEA versus early CEA.

摘要

有症状的同侧颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的时机在实际应用中随时间不断演变。关键的标志性试验概述了在近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄中进行CEA的益处,近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄定义为在首次神经事件发生后6个月内进行血运重建。进一步的证据和亚分析表明,在症状出现后2周内进行CEA在降低无卒中生存率方面具有最大益处,且围手术期并发症情况安全。这已转化为指南推荐和广泛的临床实践。有人提出并研究了在早期CEA(症状出现后2周内)基础上进行紧急CEA(首次神经事件发生后48小时内)的情况。关于紧急CEA围手术期并发症的数据大多来自回顾性单系列研究。文献中对于紧急CEA的安全性和风险存在适度的权衡。尽管许多研究显示与紧急CEA相关的围手术期卒中及死亡率可接受,但仍有证据表明围手术期并发症可能并非微不足道。如果首发神经症状是卒中而非短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或一过性黑矇,情况尤其如此。在现代积极使用双重抗血小板药物和他汀类药物进行药物治疗的实践背景下,有证据表明手术干预前复发性缺血事件会减少。仔细的患者选择、首发神经症状和药物治疗可能是考虑紧急CEA与早期CEA的关键因素。

相似文献

7

本文引用的文献

10
Risk of early recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis.有症状颈动脉狭窄患者早期复发性卒中的风险
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;49(2):137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验