Suppr超能文献

编辑推荐——急诊颈动脉内膜切除术与手术风险增加相关:颈动脉警报研究

Editor's Choice - Very Urgent Carotid Endarterectomy is Associated with an Increased Procedural Risk: The Carotid Alarm Study.

作者信息

Nordanstig A, Rosengren L, Strömberg S, Österberg K, Karlsson L, Bergström G, Fekete Z, Jood K

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Sep;54(3):278-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The aim of the Carotid Alarm Study was to compare the procedural risk of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed within 48 hours with that after 48 hours to 14 days following an ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischaemic event.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing CEA were prospectively recruited. Time to surgery was calculated as time from the most recent ischaemic event preceding surgery. A neurologist examined patients before and, after CEA. The primary endpoint was the composite endpoint of death and/or any stroke within 30 days of the surgical procedure. The study was designed to include 600 patients, with 150 operated on within 48 hours.

RESULTS

From October 2010 to December 2015, 418 patients were included, of whom 75 were operated within 48 hours of an ischaemic event. The study was prematurely terminated owing to the slow recruitment rate in the group operated on within 48 hours. Patients undergoing CEA within 48 hours had a higher risk of reaching the primary endpoint than those operated on later (8.0% vs. 2.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that CEA performed within 48 h (odds ratio [OR] 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-9.09), CEA performed out of office hours (OR 3.65; 95% CI 1.14-11.67), and use of shunt (OR 4.02; 95% CI 1.36-11.93) were all independently associated with an increased risk of reaching the primary endpoint.

CONCLUSION

CEA performed within 48 hours was associated with a higher risk of complications compared with surgery performed 48 hours-14 days after the most recent ischaemic event.

摘要

目的/背景:颈动脉警报研究的目的是比较在同侧脑血管缺血事件发生后48小时内进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)与48小时后至14天进行该手术的操作风险。

方法

前瞻性招募有症状性颈动脉狭窄并接受CEA的连续患者。手术时间计算为从手术前最近一次缺血事件起的时间。一名神经科医生在CEA前后对患者进行检查。主要终点是手术30天内死亡和/或任何卒中的复合终点。该研究计划纳入600例患者,其中150例在48小时内接受手术。

结果

2010年10月至2015年12月,共纳入418例患者,其中75例在缺血事件发生后48小时内接受手术。由于48小时内接受手术组的招募速度缓慢,该研究提前终止。48小时内接受CEA的患者达到主要终点的风险高于后期接受手术的患者(8.0%对2.9%)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,48小时内进行CEA(比值比[OR]3.07;95%置信区间[CI]1.04 - 9.09)、非工作时间进行CEA(OR 3.65;95%CI 1.14 - 11.67)以及使用分流器(OR 4.02;95%CI 1.36 - 11.93)均与达到主要终点的风险增加独立相关。

结论

与在最近一次缺血事件发生48小时至14天后进行的手术相比,48小时内进行CEA的并发症风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验