• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一级预防:对基本概念的新审视。

Primary prevention: a new look at basic concepts.

作者信息

Wallack L, Winkleby M

机构信息

Department of Social and Administrative Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(8):923-30. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90263-2.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(87)90263-2
PMID:3317892
Abstract

Personal health and well-being are gaining priority on the American agenda. A renewed interest in health promotion has been facilitated by the need to contain health care costs, realization of the limits of medicine in preventing illness, and a deeply rooted societal ethic of personal responsibility for individual health. Although the health status of Americans has changed significantly for the better during this century, further improvements are necessary, especially among high risk subgroups within the population who have not been effectively reached by traditional health promotion strategies. Past efforts, aimed at individuals modifying their risk factors, have neglected to address environmental factors that contribute to disease risk. This points to the need for an integrated approach where problems are addressed as properties of the systems in which individuals behave. This paper reviews selected health trends in the United States, discusses limitations of the current approach to health promotion, presents a comprehensive definition of prevention, and provides principles for planning that may facilitate improved health status in this country.

摘要

个人健康与幸福在美国议程上正日益受到重视。控制医疗成本的需求、对医学在预防疾病方面局限性的认识以及社会对个人健康负有责任这一根深蒂固的伦理观念,推动了人们对健康促进的新兴趣。尽管本世纪美国人的健康状况已显著改善,但仍有必要进一步提升,尤其是在传统健康促进策略未能有效覆盖的高风险亚群体中。过去旨在让个人改变风险因素的努力,忽略了那些导致疾病风险的环境因素。这表明需要一种综合方法,将问题作为个体行为所处系统的属性来处理。本文回顾了美国选定的健康趋势,讨论了当前健康促进方法的局限性,给出了预防的全面定义,并提供了有助于改善该国健康状况的规划原则。

相似文献

1
Primary prevention: a new look at basic concepts.一级预防:对基本概念的新审视。
Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(8):923-30. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90263-2.
2
Opportunities for health promotion and disease prevention in the clinical setting.临床环境中促进健康和预防疾病的机会。
West J Med. 1988 Oct;149(4):468-74.
3
Disease prevention and health promotion practices of primary care physicians in the United States.美国初级保健医生的疾病预防与健康促进实践
Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(4 Suppl):9-16.
4
Health promotion/disease prevention: implications for radiologic technology.健康促进/疾病预防:对放射技术的影响
Radiol Technol. 1985 May-Jun;56(5):297-301.
5
The future of allied health in the health promotion/disease prevention movement.联合健康在健康促进/疾病预防运动中的未来。
J Allied Health. 1986 Nov;15(4):349-55.
6
Two pathways to prevention.
Am Psychol. 2000 Apr;55(4):382-96.
7
[Promoting instead of controlling health--lessons learned, lessons to learn].促进而非控制健康——吸取的教训与有待汲取的教训
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Jan;72(1):23-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1237739. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
8
Personal responsibility for health? A review of the arguments and the evidence at century's end.个人对健康负责?世纪末对相关论据及证据的综述。
Health Educ Behav. 1999 Feb;26(1):121-40. doi: 10.1177/109019819902600110.
9
Health promotion and disease prevention.健康促进与疾病预防。
Med Educ. 1992 May;26(3):175-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00150.x.
10
Mass media, secular trends, and the future of cardiovascular disease health promotion: an interpretive analysis.大众媒体、长期趋势与心血管疾病健康促进的未来:一项诠释性分析
Prev Med. 1999 Dec;29(6 Pt 2):S50-8. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0456.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining HIV risk and determining responsibility in postsocialist Poland.定义 HIV 风险并确定后社会主义波兰的责任。
Med Anthropol Q. 2009 Dec;23(4):417-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2009.01071.x.
2
A community-based heart disease intervention: predictors of change.一项基于社区的心脏病干预措施:变化的预测因素
Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):767-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.767.
3
Comparison of risk factors for ill health in a sample of homeless and nonhomeless poor.无家可归者与非无家可归贫困者样本中健康不良风险因素的比较。
Public Health Rep. 1990 Jul-Aug;105(4):404-10.