Winkleby M A
Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1885.
Public Health Rep. 1990 Jul-Aug;105(4):404-10.
This cross-sectional survey was undertaken to examine whether the homeless poor have a higher prevalence of risk factors for ill health than the nonhomeless poor. Seventy-one adults in four age groups who attended a free-meal program in northern California were recruited during a 1-month period in 1987. The majority of the respondents lived on the streets, in vehicles, or in substandard housing located in an area undergoing rapid urban redevelopment. Regardless of employment or government assistance, the income of 100 percent of the respondents fell below the Federal poverty level. Overall, the sociodemographic profile of the study population was remarkably similar to that of the general population of California adults. Sixty-six percent had completed high school, 78 per cent had lived in the city for 5 or more years and, at most, 23 percent reported serious alcohol or emotional problems. When compared with the nonhomeless poor, the homeless poor were slightly less educated, more mobile, and more likely to report alcohol and emotional problems. Larger differences were evident for health-related variables, with the homeless poor being significantly less likely to have health insurance coverage, to receive preventive health care, and to be nonsmokers than the nonhomeless poor (P values less than .05). There were also large differences in access to heated rooms, running hot water, and cooking facilities, with approximately 90 percent of the homeless poor reporting no access to these fundamental necessities.
本次横断面调查旨在研究无家可归的贫困人口与非无家可归的贫困人口相比,是否有更高的健康危险因素患病率。1987年的1个月时间里,招募了北加利福尼亚州参加免费膳食项目的四个年龄组的71名成年人。大多数受访者露宿街头、住在车里或住在城市快速重建区域的不合标准的住房里。无论就业与否或是否接受政府援助,所有受访者的收入均低于联邦贫困线。总体而言,研究人群的社会人口学特征与加利福尼亚州成年人群体的特征非常相似。66%的人完成了高中学业,78%的人在该市居住了5年或更长时间,最多23%的人报告有严重的酗酒或情绪问题。与非无家可归的贫困人口相比,无家可归的贫困人口受教育程度略低,流动性更强,更有可能报告酗酒和情绪问题。在与健康相关的变量方面差异更为明显,无家可归的贫困人口拥有医疗保险、接受预防性医疗保健以及不吸烟的可能性明显低于非无家可归的贫困人口(P值小于0.05)。在使用供暖房间、热水和烹饪设施方面也存在很大差异,约90%的无家可归的贫困人口表示无法使用这些基本生活设施。