• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of risk factors for ill health in a sample of homeless and nonhomeless poor.无家可归者与非无家可归贫困者样本中健康不良风险因素的比较。
Public Health Rep. 1990 Jul-Aug;105(4):404-10.
2
Ophthalmic disorders among the homeless and nonhomeless in Los Angeles.洛杉矶无家可归者与非无家可归者的眼科疾病
J Am Optom Assoc. 1997 Sep;68(9):567-73.
3
Differences in Experiences With Care Between Homeless and Nonhomeless Patients in Veterans Affairs Facilities With Tailored and Nontailored Primary Care Teams.退伍军人事务部有定制和非定制初级保健团队的医疗机构中,无家可归和非无家可归患者在医疗护理方面的体验差异。
Med Care. 2018 Jul;56(7):610-618. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000926.
4
Substance use off and on school grounds: A California statewide comparison between different groups of homeless students and nonhomeless students.校园内外的物质使用:加利福尼亚州对不同群体无家可归学生和非无家可归学生的全州比较。
Addict Behav. 2019 May;92:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
5
Disparities in Care and Mortality Among Homeless Adults Hospitalized for Cardiovascular Conditions.无家可归的心血管病住院患者的照护差异与死亡率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):357-366. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6010.
6
When health insurance is not a factor: national comparison of homeless and nonhomeless US veterans who use Veterans Affairs Emergency Departments.当医疗保险不是一个因素时:使用退伍军人事务部急诊部的美国无家可归和非无家可归退伍军人的国家比较。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S225-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301307. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
7
Housing status and health care service utilization among low-income persons with HIV/AIDS.低收入艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的住房状况与医疗服务利用情况
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Oct;15(10):731-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91003.x.
8
A diagnostic comparison of homeless and nonhomeless patients in an urban mental health clinic.城市心理健康诊所中无家可归患者与非无家可归患者的诊断比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997 May;32(4):236-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00788244.
9
Rates and Predictors of Uncontrolled Hypertension Among Hypertensive Homeless Adults Using New York City Shelter-Based Clinics.使用纽约市庇护所诊所的高血压无家可归成年人中未控制高血压的发生率及预测因素。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;14(1):41-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1882.
10
The medical origins of homelessness.无家可归的医学根源。
Am J Public Health. 1992 Oct;82(10):1394-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.10.1394.

引用本文的文献

1
The North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI): profile of participants in North America's first trial of heroin-assisted treatment.北美阿片类药物治疗倡议(NAOMI):北美首次海洛因辅助治疗试验参与者概况
J Urban Health. 2008 Nov;85(6):812-25. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9312-9. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
2
Health characteristics and medical service use patterns of sheltered homeless and low-income housed mothers.庇护所中的无家可归者和低收入有住房的母亲的健康特征及医疗服务使用模式
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jun;13(6):389-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00119.x.
3
Association between time homeless and perceived health status among the homeless in San Francisco.
J Community Health. 1997 Aug;22(4):271-82. doi: 10.1023/a:1025152403545.
4
Ambulatory health services provided to low-income and homeless adult patients in a major community health center.在一家大型社区健康中心为低收入和无家可归的成年患者提供的门诊医疗服务。
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Mar;11(3):156-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02600268.
5
The diversity of case management needs for the care of homeless persons.照顾无家可归者的病例管理需求的多样性。
Public Health Rep. 1991 Jan-Feb;106(1):15-9.
6
The medical origins of homelessness.无家可归的医学根源。
Am J Public Health. 1992 Oct;82(10):1394-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.10.1394.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship of education to major risk factors and death from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular diseases and all causes, Findings of three Chicago epidemiologic studies.教育与冠心病、心血管疾病及所有病因导致的主要风险因素和死亡之间的关系:三项芝加哥流行病学研究的结果
Circulation. 1982 Dec;66(6):1308-14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.66.6.1308.
2
Down and out in the city: the homeless mentally ill.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1983 Sep;34(9):817-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.34.9.817.
3
A psychiatric profile of street people admitted to an emergency shelter.入住紧急避难所的街头流浪人员的精神状况剖析。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1983 Sep;34(9):812-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.34.9.812.
4
Is homelessness a mental health problem?无家可归是一个心理健康问题吗?
Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Dec;141(12):1546-50. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.12.1546.
5
Social class, life expectancy and overall mortality.社会阶层、预期寿命与总体死亡率。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1967 Apr;45(2):31-73.
6
Epidemiological considerations underlying the allocation of health and disease care resources.健康与疾病护理资源分配背后的流行病学考量。
Int J Epidemiol. 1972 Spring;1(1):69-74. doi: 10.1093/ije/1.1.69.
7
New perspectives on homelessness: findings from a statewide epidemiological study.无家可归问题的新视角:一项全州范围流行病学研究的结果
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1986 Jul;37(7):712-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.37.7.712.
8
Social/economic status and disease.社会/经济地位与疾病
Annu Rev Public Health. 1987;8:111-35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.08.050187.000551.
9
Why does family homelessness occur? A case-control study.家庭无家可归现象为何会发生?一项病例对照研究。
Am J Public Health. 1988 Jul;78(7):783-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.7.783.
10
Primary prevention: a new look at basic concepts.一级预防:对基本概念的新审视。
Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(8):923-30. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90263-2.

无家可归者与非无家可归贫困者样本中健康不良风险因素的比较。

Comparison of risk factors for ill health in a sample of homeless and nonhomeless poor.

作者信息

Winkleby M A

机构信息

Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1885.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1990 Jul-Aug;105(4):404-10.

PMID:2116644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1580085/
Abstract

This cross-sectional survey was undertaken to examine whether the homeless poor have a higher prevalence of risk factors for ill health than the nonhomeless poor. Seventy-one adults in four age groups who attended a free-meal program in northern California were recruited during a 1-month period in 1987. The majority of the respondents lived on the streets, in vehicles, or in substandard housing located in an area undergoing rapid urban redevelopment. Regardless of employment or government assistance, the income of 100 percent of the respondents fell below the Federal poverty level. Overall, the sociodemographic profile of the study population was remarkably similar to that of the general population of California adults. Sixty-six percent had completed high school, 78 per cent had lived in the city for 5 or more years and, at most, 23 percent reported serious alcohol or emotional problems. When compared with the nonhomeless poor, the homeless poor were slightly less educated, more mobile, and more likely to report alcohol and emotional problems. Larger differences were evident for health-related variables, with the homeless poor being significantly less likely to have health insurance coverage, to receive preventive health care, and to be nonsmokers than the nonhomeless poor (P values less than .05). There were also large differences in access to heated rooms, running hot water, and cooking facilities, with approximately 90 percent of the homeless poor reporting no access to these fundamental necessities.

摘要

本次横断面调查旨在研究无家可归的贫困人口与非无家可归的贫困人口相比,是否有更高的健康危险因素患病率。1987年的1个月时间里,招募了北加利福尼亚州参加免费膳食项目的四个年龄组的71名成年人。大多数受访者露宿街头、住在车里或住在城市快速重建区域的不合标准的住房里。无论就业与否或是否接受政府援助,所有受访者的收入均低于联邦贫困线。总体而言,研究人群的社会人口学特征与加利福尼亚州成年人群体的特征非常相似。66%的人完成了高中学业,78%的人在该市居住了5年或更长时间,最多23%的人报告有严重的酗酒或情绪问题。与非无家可归的贫困人口相比,无家可归的贫困人口受教育程度略低,流动性更强,更有可能报告酗酒和情绪问题。在与健康相关的变量方面差异更为明显,无家可归的贫困人口拥有医疗保险、接受预防性医疗保健以及不吸烟的可能性明显低于非无家可归的贫困人口(P值小于0.05)。在使用供暖房间、热水和烹饪设施方面也存在很大差异,约90%的无家可归的贫困人口表示无法使用这些基本生活设施。