• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平衡用于放射治疗结果建模的机器学习方法的准确性和可解释性。

Balancing accuracy and interpretability of machine learning approaches for radiation treatment outcomes modeling.

作者信息

Luo Yi, Tseng Huan-Hsin, Cui Sunan, Wei Lise, Ten Haken Randall K, El Naqa Issam

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, 519 W William Street, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

BJR Open. 2019 Jul 4;1(1):20190021. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20190021. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1259/bjro.20190021
PMID:33178948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592485/
Abstract

Radiation outcomes prediction (ROP) plays an important role in personalized prescription and adaptive radiotherapy. A clinical decision may not only depend on an accurate radiation outcomes' prediction, but also needs to be made based on an informed understanding of the relationship among patients' characteristics, radiation response and treatment plans. As more patients' biophysical information become available, machine learning (ML) techniques will have a great potential for improving ROP. Creating explainable ML methods is an ultimate task for clinical practice but remains a challenging one. Towards complete explainability, the interpretability of ML approaches needs to be first explored. Hence, this review focuses on the application of ML techniques for clinical adoption in radiation oncology by balancing accuracy with interpretability of the predictive model of interest. An ML algorithm can be generally classified into an interpretable (IP) or non-interpretable (NIP) ("black box") technique. While the former may provide a clearer explanation to aid clinical decision-making, its prediction performance is generally outperformed by the latter. Therefore, great efforts and resources have been dedicated towards balancing the accuracy and the interpretability of ML approaches in ROP, but more still needs to be done. In this review, current progress to increase the accuracy for IP ML approaches is introduced, and major trends to improve the interpretability and alleviate the "black box" stigma of ML in radiation outcomes modeling are summarized. Efforts to integrate IP and NIP ML approaches to produce predictive models with higher accuracy and interpretability for ROP are also discussed.

摘要

放射治疗结果预测(ROP)在个性化处方和适应性放射治疗中起着重要作用。临床决策不仅可能取决于准确的放射治疗结果预测,还需要在充分了解患者特征、放射反应和治疗计划之间关系的基础上做出。随着越来越多患者的生物物理信息可用,机器学习(ML)技术在改善ROP方面将具有巨大潜力。创建可解释的ML方法是临床实践的最终任务,但仍然具有挑战性。为了实现完全可解释性,需要首先探索ML方法的可解释性。因此,本综述重点关注通过平衡感兴趣的预测模型的准确性和可解释性,将ML技术应用于放射肿瘤学的临床实践。ML算法通常可分为可解释(IP)或不可解释(NIP)(“黑箱”)技术。虽然前者可能提供更清晰的解释以辅助临床决策,但其预测性能通常不如后者。因此,人们付出了巨大努力和资源来平衡ROP中ML方法的准确性和可解释性,但仍有更多工作要做。在本综述中,介绍了提高IP ML方法准确性的当前进展,并总结了改善ML在放射治疗结果建模中的可解释性和减轻“黑箱”污名的主要趋势。还讨论了整合IP和NIP ML方法以生成具有更高准确性和可解释性的ROP预测模型的努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/9587b91fce0b/bjro.20190021.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/caf3edfe721a/bjro.20190021.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/26cc4c97389c/bjro.20190021.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/e8ff7ecd625d/bjro.20190021.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/ea79f8522c46/bjro.20190021.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/9587b91fce0b/bjro.20190021.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/caf3edfe721a/bjro.20190021.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/26cc4c97389c/bjro.20190021.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/e8ff7ecd625d/bjro.20190021.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/ea79f8522c46/bjro.20190021.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a7/7592485/9587b91fce0b/bjro.20190021.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Balancing accuracy and interpretability of machine learning approaches for radiation treatment outcomes modeling.平衡用于放射治疗结果建模的机器学习方法的准确性和可解释性。
BJR Open. 2019 Jul 4;1(1):20190021. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20190021. eCollection 2019.
2
Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Image Classification Problems: Case Study on Glioma Cancer Prediction.用于图像分类问题的可解释机器学习框架:脑胶质瘤癌症预测案例研究
J Imaging. 2020 May 28;6(6):37. doi: 10.3390/jimaging6060037.
3
Machine learning for radiation outcome modeling and prediction.机器学习在放射治疗结局建模和预测中的应用。
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(5):e178-e184. doi: 10.1002/mp.13570.
4
Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods.可解释人工智能:机器学习可解释性方法综述
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Dec 25;23(1):18. doi: 10.3390/e23010018.
5
Opening the Black Box: The Promise and Limitations of Explainable Machine Learning in Cardiology.揭开黑箱:可解释机器学习在心脏病学中的前景与局限。
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Feb;38(2):204-213. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
Demystifying the Black Box: The Importance of Interpretability of Predictive Models in Neurocritical Care.揭开黑箱的神秘面纱:神经危重症中预测模型可解释性的重要性。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(Suppl 2):185-191. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01504-4. Epub 2022 May 6.
7
Towards a safe and efficient clinical implementation of machine learning in radiation oncology by exploring model interpretability, explainability and data-model dependency.通过探索模型的可解释性、可解释性和数据-模型依赖性,实现机器学习在放射肿瘤学中的安全高效临床应用。
Phys Med Biol. 2022 May 27;67(11). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac678a.
8
Improving Clinical Translation of Machine Learning Approaches Through Clinician-Tailored Visual Displays of Black Box Algorithms: Development and Validation.通过针对临床医生定制的黑箱算法可视化显示来改善机器学习方法的临床转化:开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 9;8(6):e15791. doi: 10.2196/15791.
9
A critical moment in machine learning in medicine: on reproducible and interpretable learning.医学机器学习的关键时刻:可重现且可解释的学习。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jan 16;166(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-05892-8.
10
Machine Learning Explainability in Breast Cancer Survival.乳腺癌生存中的机器学习可解释性
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:307-311. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200172.

引用本文的文献

1
The application of machine learning in predicting post-cardiac surgery acute kidney injury in pediatric patients: a systematic review.机器学习在预测小儿心脏手术后急性肾损伤中的应用:一项系统综述。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Aug 12;13:1581578. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1581578. eCollection 2025.
2
Time series analysis of dosimetric changes in target volumes and organs at risk monitored by cone beam computed tomography during radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌放疗期间通过锥形束计算机断层扫描监测的靶区和危及器官剂量学变化的时间序列分析
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Aug 11;35:100822. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100822. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Interpretable Predictions of Clinical Outcomes with An Attention-based Recurrent Neural Network.基于注意力机制的循环神经网络对临床结果的可解释预测
ACM BCB. 2017 Aug;2017:233-240. doi: 10.1145/3107411.3107445.
2
Combining handcrafted features with latent variables in machine learning for prediction of radiation-induced lung damage.将机器学习中的手工特征与潜在变量相结合,以预测放射性肺损伤。
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):2497-2511. doi: 10.1002/mp.13497. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
3
Development of a Fully Cross-Validated Bayesian Network Approach for Local Control Prediction in Lung Cancer.
Integrating peritumor and tumor CT radiomics features in predicting local control after SBRT in patients with pulmonary oligometastases.
整合瘤周和肿瘤CT影像组学特征预测肺寡转移患者立体定向体部放疗后的局部控制情况
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Aug 14;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02712-w.
4
Radiobiological Modeling with Monte Carlo Tools - Simulating Cellular Responses to Ionizing Radiation.使用蒙特卡洛工具进行放射生物学建模——模拟细胞对电离辐射的反应。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251350909. doi: 10.1177/15330338251350909. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
5
Decision support using machine learning for predicting adequate bladder filling in prostate radiotherapy: a feasibility study.使用机器学习进行决策支持以预测前列腺放疗中膀胱的充分充盈:一项可行性研究。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s12194-025-00916-z.
6
Performance Comparison of 10 State-of-the-Art Machine Learning Algorithms for Outcome Prediction Modeling of Radiation-Induced Toxicity.用于辐射诱导毒性结果预测建模的10种先进机器学习算法的性能比较
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Nov 13;10(2):101675. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101675. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
A data science approach to optimize ADHD assessment with the BRIEF-2 questionnaire.一种运用BRIEF-2问卷优化注意力缺陷多动障碍评估的数据科学方法。
Transl Neurosci. 2024 Oct 8;15(1):20220349. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0349. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
8
An intelligent learning system based on electronic health records for unbiased stroke prediction.基于电子健康记录的无偏卒中预测智能学习系统。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 4;14(1):23052. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73570-x.
9
Using real-world electronic health record data to predict the development of 12 cancer-related symptoms in the context of multimorbidity.利用真实世界的电子健康记录数据预测多病共存情况下12种癌症相关症状的发生发展。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Sep 12;7(3):ooae082. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae082. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Validation of a machine learning algorithm for identifying infants at risk of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in a large unseen data set.在一个大型未知数据集中验证用于识别有缺氧缺血性脑病风险婴儿的机器学习算法。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2025 Apr 17;110(3):279-284. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327366.
用于肺癌局部控制预测的完全交叉验证贝叶斯网络方法的开发
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2019 Mar;3(2):232-241. doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2018.2832609. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
Prospects and challenges for clinical decision support in the era of big data.大数据时代临床决策支持的前景与挑战
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018;2. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
Deep learning for lung cancer prognostication: A retrospective multi-cohort radiomics study.深度学习在肺癌预后预测中的应用:一项回顾性多队列放射组学研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 30;15(11):e1002711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002711. eCollection 2018 Nov.
6
Machine Learning and Imaging Informatics in Oncology.肿瘤学中的机器学习和成像信息学。
Oncology. 2020;98(6):344-362. doi: 10.1159/000493575. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Performance Comparison of Knowledge-Based Dose Prediction Techniques Based on Limited Patient Data.基于有限患者数据的基于知识的剂量预测技术的性能比较
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818811150. doi: 10.1177/1533033818811150.
8
Deep learning in medical imaging and radiation therapy.深度学习在医学影像和放射治疗中的应用。
Med Phys. 2019 Jan;46(1):e1-e36. doi: 10.1002/mp.13264. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
9
Radiation Therapy Outcomes Models in the Era of Radiomics and Radiogenomics: Uncertainties and Validation.放射组学和放射基因组学时代的放射治疗结局模型:不确定性和验证。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1070-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
10
Preoperative and postoperative prediction of long-term meningioma outcomes.术前和术后预测脑膜瘤的长期预后。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0204161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204161. eCollection 2018.