Anand Anil Kumar, Dua Bharat, Bansal Anil Kumar, Singh Heigrujam Malhotra, Verma Amit, Kumar Amit
Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
BJR Open. 2020 Mar 3;2(1):20190051. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20190051. eCollection 2020.
To assess the response and toxicity of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC), who had previously received radiation for their primary tumor.
Between 2014 and 2018, patients who received SABR to recurrent HNC within the previously irradiated region were retrospectively reviewed. Mean age was 60 years (range 30-78 Years). Histology was confirmed in all patients. MRI and /or CT-positron emission tomography were done to evaluate local extent and to rule out metastasis. Response was assessed as per RECIST/PERCIST Criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression and the Kaplan-Meier methods were used for statistical analysis.
32 patients received SABR. RPA Class II, III patients were 20 and 12 respectively. 87% patients received a dose of ≥30 Gy/5 fractions. Median follow-up was 12 months. Estimated 1 year and 2 years local control was 64.2 and 32% and 1 year and 2 years overall survival was 67.5 and 39.5% respectively. Acute Grade 2 skin and Grade 3 mucosal toxicity was seen in 31.3 and 28% patients respectively. Late Grade 3 toxicity was seen in 9.3% patients.
Re-irradiation with SABR yields high local control rates and is well tolerated. It compares favorably with other treatment modalities offered to patients with recurrent HNC. It is also suitable for patients of RPA Class II and III. There is need for novel systemic agents to further improve the survival.
Treatment of patients with recurrent HNC is challenging and is more difficult in previously radiated patient. More than 50% patients are unresectable. Other options of salvage treatment like re-irradiation and chemotherapy are associated with poor response rates and high incidence of acute and late toxicity (Gr ≥3 toxicity 50-70%). SABR is a novel technology to deliver high dose of radiation to recurrent tumor with high precision. It yields high local control rates with less toxicity compared to conventionally fractionated radiation.
评估立体定向消融放疗(SABR)对复发性头颈癌(HNC)患者的疗效和毒性,这些患者之前曾因原发性肿瘤接受过放疗。
回顾性分析2014年至2018年间在先前照射区域内接受SABR治疗复发性HNC的患者。平均年龄为60岁(范围30 - 78岁)。所有患者均经组织学确诊。进行MRI和/或CT - 正电子发射断层扫描以评估局部范围并排除转移。根据RECIST/PERCIST标准评估疗效。采用Cox比例风险回归和Kaplan - Meier方法进行统计分析。
32例患者接受了SABR治疗。RPA II级、III级患者分别为20例和12例。87%的患者接受了≥30 Gy/5次分割的剂量。中位随访时间为12个月。估计1年和2年的局部控制率分别为64.2%和32%,1年和2年的总生存率分别为67.5%和39.5%。分别有31.3%和28%的患者出现急性2级皮肤毒性和3级黏膜毒性。9.3%的患者出现晚期3级毒性。
SABR再程放疗可产生较高的局部控制率且耐受性良好。与为复发性HNC患者提供的其他治疗方式相比具有优势。它也适用于RPA II级和III级患者。需要新型全身治疗药物来进一步提高生存率。
复发性HNC患者的治疗具有挑战性,对于先前接受过放疗的患者则更困难。超过50%的患者无法切除。其他挽救治疗选择如再程放疗和化疗的缓解率低且急慢性毒性发生率高(≥3级毒性为50 - 70%)。SABR是一种将高剂量放疗高精度地传递至复发性肿瘤的新技术。与传统分割放疗相比,它能产生较高的局部控制率且毒性较小。