• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不可见事物的图像:在数据驱动的计算模型中推断抽象词和具体词的视觉表征

Images of the unseen: extrapolating visual representations for abstract and concrete words in a data-driven computational model.

作者信息

Günther Fritz, Petilli Marco Alessandro, Vergallito Alessandra, Marelli Marco

机构信息

University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2512-2532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01429-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01429-7
PMID:33180152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9674750/
Abstract

Theories of grounded cognition assume that conceptual representations are grounded in sensorimotor experience. However, abstract concepts such as jealousy or childhood have no directly associated referents with which such sensorimotor experience can be made; therefore, the grounding of abstract concepts has long been a topic of debate. Here, we propose (a) that systematic relations exist between semantic representations learned from language on the one hand and perceptual experience on the other hand, (b) that these relations can be learned in a bottom-up fashion, and (c) that it is possible to extrapolate from this learning experience to predict expected perceptual representations for words even where direct experience is missing. To test this, we implement a data-driven computational model that is trained to map language-based representations (obtained from text corpora, representing language experience) onto vision-based representations (obtained from an image database, representing perceptual experience), and apply its mapping function onto language-based representations for abstract and concrete words outside the training set. In three experiments, we present participants with these words, accompanied by two images: the image predicted by the model and a random control image. Results show that participants' judgements were in line with model predictions even for the most abstract words. This preference was stronger for more concrete items and decreased for the more abstract ones. Taken together, our findings have substantial implications in support of the grounding of abstract words, suggesting that we can tap into our previous experience to create possible visual representation we don't have.

摘要

具身认知理论认为概念表征基于感觉运动经验。然而,诸如嫉妒或童年等抽象概念没有与之直接关联的可产生此类感觉运动经验的指称对象;因此,抽象概念的基础长期以来一直是一个争论的话题。在此,我们提出:(a)一方面从语言中学到的语义表征与另一方面的感知经验之间存在系统关系;(b)这些关系可以自下而上的方式习得;(c)即使在缺乏直接经验的情况下,也有可能从这种学习经验中进行推断,以预测单词的预期感知表征。为了对此进行测试,我们实现了一个数据驱动的计算模型,该模型经过训练,将基于语言的表征(从文本语料库中获得,代表语言经验)映射到基于视觉的表征(从图像数据库中获得,代表感知经验),并将其映射功能应用于训练集之外的抽象和具体单词的基于语言的表征。在三个实验中,我们向参与者呈现这些单词,并伴有两张图像:模型预测的图像和随机对照图像。结果表明,即使对于最抽象的单词,参与者的判断也与模型预测一致。对于更具体的项目,这种偏好更强,而对于更抽象的项目则有所下降。综上所述,我们的研究结果对支持抽象单词的基础具有重大意义,表明我们可以利用以往的经验来创建我们没有的可能视觉表征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/45ce2291ea29/426_2020_1429_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/07bb5432bd37/426_2020_1429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/28831eb61388/426_2020_1429_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/5a7220628e4b/426_2020_1429_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/a300a65a3c38/426_2020_1429_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/45ce2291ea29/426_2020_1429_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/07bb5432bd37/426_2020_1429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/28831eb61388/426_2020_1429_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/5a7220628e4b/426_2020_1429_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/a300a65a3c38/426_2020_1429_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/9674750/45ce2291ea29/426_2020_1429_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Images of the unseen: extrapolating visual representations for abstract and concrete words in a data-driven computational model.不可见事物的图像:在数据驱动的计算模型中推断抽象词和具体词的视觉表征
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2512-2532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01429-7.
2
Language with vision: A study on grounded word and sentence embeddings.带视觉的语言:基于词汇和句子嵌入的研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5622-5646. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02294-z. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
A test of indirect grounding of abstract concepts using multimodal distributional semantics.一项使用多模态分布语义学对抽象概念进行间接接地的测试。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 4;13:906181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906181. eCollection 2022.
4
Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts.言语即社会工具:语言、社会性与抽象概念的内在基础
Phys Life Rev. 2019 Jul;29:120-153. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Boundaries to grounding abstract concepts.界定抽象概念的范围。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0132.
6
Symbol Grounding Without Direct Experience: Do Words Inherit Sensorimotor Activation From Purely Linguistic Context?无需直接体验的符号接地:词汇能否从纯语言语境中继承感觉运动激活?
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 2:336-374. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12549. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
The contributions of language and experience to the representation of abstract and concrete words: different weights but similar organizations.语言和经验对抽象词和具体词的表达的贡献:不同的权重但相似的组织。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Nov;40(8):1266-75. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0220-6.
8
Constructing Semantic Models From Words, Images, and Emojis.从字词、图像和表情符号构建语义模型。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12830. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12830.
9
Influence of language on perception and concept formation in a brain-constrained deep neural network model.语言对脑约束深度神经网络模型中感知和概念形成的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210373. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0373. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
10
The meaning of 'life' and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology.“生命”及其他抽象词汇的含义:来自神经心理学的见解。
J Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;10(2):317-43. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12065. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Cracking arbitrariness: A data-driven study of auditory iconicity in spoken English.破解任意性:一项关于英语口语中听觉象似性的数据驱动研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1425-1442. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02630-0. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Visual experience modulates the sensitivity to the distributional history of words in natural language.视觉体验会调节对自然语言中词汇分布历史的敏感度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):472-481. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02557-6. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Visual Intuitions in the Absence of Visual Experience: The Role of Direct Experience in Concreteness and Imageability Judgements.

本文引用的文献

1
Redundancy, isomorphism, and propagative mechanisms between emotional and amodal representations of words: A computational study.词语情感和非模态表象之间冗余、同形和传播机制:一项计算研究。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Feb;49(2):219-234. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01086-6.
2
Exploring What Is Encoded in Distributional Word Vectors: A Neurobiologically Motivated Analysis.探索分布词向量中编码的内容:一种受神经生物学启发的分析。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Jun;44(6):e12844. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12844.
3
Task-Dependent Recruitment of Modality-Specific and Multimodal Regions during Conceptual Processing.
缺乏视觉体验时的视觉直觉:直接体验在具体性和可想象性判断中的作用
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 9;7(1):3. doi: 10.5334/joc.328. eCollection 2024.
4
The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Extrapolating affective values for 38,000+ Chinese words via a computational model.善、恶与矛盾情感:通过计算模型推断38000多个中文词汇的情感价值。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5386-5405. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02274-3. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
5
Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper.六个语言粒度层次上的具身加工:一篇共识论文。
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):60. doi: 10.5334/joc.231. eCollection 2023.
6
Sensorimotor distance: A grounded measure of semantic similarity for 800 million concept pairs.感觉运动距离:用于衡量 8 亿对概念对语义相似性的基础测度。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3416-3432. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01965-7. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
7
A Cross-Modal and Cross-lingual Study of Iconicity in Language: Insights From Deep Learning.语言象似性的跨模态和跨语言研究:深度学习的启示。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Jun;46(6):e13147. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13147.
8
Concrete constraints on abstract concepts-editorial.具体限制抽象概念——社论。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2366-2369. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01685-9.
9
Modelling concrete and abstract concepts using brain-constrained deep neural networks.使用受大脑约束的深度神经网络对具体和抽象概念进行建模。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2533-2559. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01591-6.
任务相关的概念加工过程中,模态特异和多模态区域的招募。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jun 1;30(7):3938-3959. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa010.
4
Trying to make it work: Compositional effects in the processing of compound "nonwords".试图使之生效:复合“非词”加工中的构成效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jul;73(7):1082-1091. doi: 10.1177/1747021820902019. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
5
Somatic and visceral effects of word valence, arousal and concreteness in a continuum lexical space.在连续词汇空间中,单词的积极度、唤醒度和具体度对躯体和内脏的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56382-2.
6
The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.兰开斯特感觉运动规范:40000 个英语单词的感知和动作强度的多维测量
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1271-1291. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z.
7
The grounding of abstract concepts in the motor and visual system: An fMRI study.抽象概念在运动和视觉系统中的基础:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Cortex. 2020 Mar;124:1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
8
The use of number words in natural language obeys Weber's law.自然语言中数词的使用符合韦伯定律。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jul;149(7):1215-1230. doi: 10.1037/xge0000715. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Processing of Action and Sound Verbs in Context: An FMRI Study.情境中动作和声音动词的加工:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Transl Neurosci. 2019 Oct 15;10:200-222. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2019-0035. eCollection 2019.
10
Vector-Space Models of Semantic Representation From a Cognitive Perspective: A Discussion of Common Misconceptions.从认知角度看语义表示的向量空间模型:常见误区讨论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;14(6):1006-1033. doi: 10.1177/1745691619861372. Epub 2019 Sep 10.